Posted on 08/01/2022 9:51:08 AM PDT by rktman
If you want to watch the pinkos fret, simply state the indisputable truth that what they call “climate change” is a massive hoax. Their fallback is inevitably that “science” – which they purport to love except when it demonstrates that there are only men and women and that you can’t change the sex you are born as – has decreed that because we peons insist on not living in caves like primitive tribesmen (okay, non-binary tribespeople) the Earth is going to cook. And, of course, the only solution is to do a whole bunch of things that leftists always wanted to do anyway. There’s no time to think, no time to reflect, and certainly no time to argue. Why, who are you to question the scientists?
Well, I’m a lawyer. I question scientists for a living.
Now, I have no scientific training to speak of. I majored in communications and political science, so the only science I studied at UC San Diego had to do with the physics of foaming when I poured Coors into a glass, as well as the mechanics of human reproduction. Don’t expect me to discourse deeply on the heat retention coefficient of CO2 – I don’t even know if that is a thing, but it sure sounds sciency.
Instead, I hire scientists in most every case I try. Sometimes I hire several in different disciplines. The other side does too, and here’s the weird thing – at trial, the other side’s scientists always, always, disagree with my scientists.
Weird, huh? Because I was told that in the context of climate change the science is settled, that there is only one possible answer and that anything else is at least quackery and possibly felony denial.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet.
4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
😵💫🤔
Sounds like the textbook, functional definition of the Spanish Inquisition
Every “science” prediction they have made has been wrong..since 1990s?
A moron could have made more accurate predictions.
Oh wait...
I have been recognized as a felonious denial type.. 😅✌
“we think we can extrapolate from them how hot it was in 2000 BC, but it is really only an educated guess.”
And they do that to a tenth of a degree!
Great article!
If you seriously believed in global warming and rising seas, you would not be buying homes like this!
I just ask them, “What’s the plan to fix it since you had 30 years to do so?”
Liberals won’t try to answer these questions.
They will just call you names.
I’ve been called “close-minded” by my liberal SIL.
Wear it like a badge of honor. 😊🙌
build back better is really the great reset here. replacing the countries main source of energy with a scam is the best way to do this
To top it all off, Crichton was a real scientist, a doctor. And while not a climatologist, he certainly understood the application of the scientific method, agenda driven conclusions and then politics behind much of the whole environmental movement.
Yup. I enjoyed his work. Sadly, most of it was closer to reality than I would like.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.