Posted on 07/27/2022 5:51:02 AM PDT by Red Badger
Private chats from Cassidy Hutchinson, who gave the Jan. 6 investigation panel a scathing depiction of the Trump White House, tell a very different story from the one she gave last month, according to a new report.
Hutchinson was the source of the since-debunked story that former President Donald Trump tried to seize control of the wheel of the presidential SUV.
The Federalist stated it has obtained private communications from Hutchinson that span from December 2020 to May of this year. Hutchinson had not replied to the printing of her communications as of Tuesday evening.
The report’s bottom line was that “Hutchinson commiserated with other targets of the probe about how little information she had about any wrongdoing that day, and lamented how corrupt the politicized committee was. Far from being upset with Trump, Hutchinson repeatedly spoke in favor of him and his presidency.”
Hutchinson was subpoenaed in November of 2021 by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s hand-picked House Select Committee investigating the Capitol incursion.
The Federalist report said she referred to the panel as a “phony committee” six days after being subpoenaed and told a former White House staff she would have little to tell the panel.
Around the same time, she told a former colleague her testimony would have nothing to offer and made a vulgar reference to Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, the panel’s chair, according to the report.
The report stated Hutchinson praised a November 2021 tweet from a former colleague mocking someone’s belief that President Joe Biden won the presidential election.
“When we win again, we’re making her comms director Or press sec,” she wrote.
Her private messages showed her consistently aligning herself with Trump supporters, according to the report.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...
The Wyoming Lizard paid her off. Certainly there is a crime in there somewhere.
Was she a mole, bribed, or blackmailed?
Attention ho.............................
So what happened? Something did. She was either bribed or threatened.
Cheney hugged her after her testimony.
There needs to be an investigation.
She is part of the plan to take down the J6 committee.
Consider her testimony was physically impossible to be true; that the committee was swallowing what she said hook line and sinker; that within hours, after the setup with her testimony, word from the SS itself was to debunk what she said - throwing egg on the J6 committee faces.
This is all staged, all the parts fit together like a well engineered puzzle.
Popcorn is in order. Plenty of it.
It’s all scripted Kabuki Theater of the Absurd.....................
Looks like her effort to “husband shop” failed.
No reason for her duplicity I can thik of makes the swamp look good. Was she a mole? Bribed? Threatened?
She craved her 15 minutes of fame and wants to milk it for all she can get........................
She was the strongest piece of hearsay evidence too.
According to the former FL AG Pam Bondi, she was out of work, desperate for a job, seeking Pam Bondi’s help to re-settle in FL near Trump. No doubt the large hugging scene between this critter and the Lizard was a thank you for coming to her rescue - perjury for money! As always FOLLOW THE MONEY!
And when no jobs were available that needed a coffee runner, she got mad and desperate due to her lack of talent. She sold out, that's a pretty weak hearsay witness in my book.....
“The report’s bottom line was that “Hutchinson commiserated with other targets of the probe about how little information she had about any wrongdoing that day, and lamented how corrupt the politicized committee was. Far from being upset with Trump, Hutchinson repeatedly spoke in favor of him and his presidency.”
It is almost like Adam Shitt got some incriminating evidence on her and forced her to testify to what he wanted to say. In other words, ‘blackmailing a witness’. It has been done by every unscrupulous prosecutor in the country...
BUT numerous conservatives, including several Freepers consistently disparage PRes. Trump for his ‘poor judgement’ in appointments.
Like; is he supposed to be a mind reader??
Suborning Perjury. It's a crime.
LIV legacy media voters will never hear about it.
Well, didn't this come out when the Republicans on the committee cross examined? Wait, What?
Was she threatened or was she paid?
Or was she just trying to please the Biden administration which will be in charge for 2.5 more years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.