Skip to comments.
House to vote on Respect for Marriage Act in response to Clarence Thomas opinion [Major Barf Alert!]
The HIll ^
| July 18, 2022
| Brooke Migdon
Posted on 07/18/2022 8:27:38 PM PDT by fwdude
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Sodomites never quit. I can see this passing.
Where's that Marriage Amendment we were promised by the REPUBLICANS who said they'd support it if the courts got out of hand?
1
posted on
07/18/2022 8:27:39 PM PDT
by
fwdude
To: fwdude
Bi-Partisan...
Democrats, and other Democrats...
What’s bi-partisan about it?
2
posted on
07/18/2022 8:33:21 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which stands.)
To: fwdude
Because that is the number one problem in America.
3
posted on
07/18/2022 8:35:25 PM PDT
by
bray
(The Vax is fake and deadly)
To: fwdude
"
The Respect for Marriage Act has been introduced in several previous Congresses, beginning with a 2009 bill that was also backed by Nadler."
YAWN.
Failed numerous times before; its "bipartisan support" is basically just Susan Collins. Will pass the House and fail in the Senate, like every other scheme the Democrats cook up in the 117th Congress.
To: Trump20162020
5
posted on
07/18/2022 8:37:45 PM PDT
by
Persevero
(You cannot comply your way out of tyranny. )
To: fwdude
For Congress or a state legislature to enact a bill establishing same-sex marriage is constitutionally valid.
For SCOTUS to declare a right to same-sex marriage is not.
Substantive due process is nonsense. All the justices know it, they just afraid of the consequences of correcting it.
6
posted on
07/18/2022 8:38:43 PM PDT
by
jdege
To: fwdude
Get the Fed's bloody claws out of marriage. I don't give one stinking, freaking tiny bit what Adam Schiff, et al think about my life. Nor do I care what some drunken slob or preening elitist or any fine human being down the road thinks.
7
posted on
07/18/2022 8:43:56 PM PDT
by
Born in 1950
(Anti left, nothing else.)
To: fwdude
Newspeak “Respect for Marriage” really means “Defense of all cohabitations masquerading as ‘marriage’”—and disrespect for the God-ordained union of one man with one woman.
8
posted on
07/18/2022 8:44:54 PM PDT
by
lightman
(I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
To: bray
Because that is the number one problem in America. Because it is.
9
posted on
07/18/2022 8:48:21 PM PDT
by
fwdude
(Every time I see someone voluntarily masked in public, I know I'm looking at a vaccinated person.)
To: lightman
Newspeak “Respect for Marriage” really means “Defense of all cohabitations masquerading as ‘marriage’”—and disrespect for the God-ordained union of one man with one woman. In sum: the power to include is the power to destroy.
10
posted on
07/18/2022 8:50:06 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Vegan
(Pot legalization licenses every degenerate pothead piece of trash to force drug neighbors.)
To: jdege
The nonsense of substantive due process is one of the reasons for the Dobbs decision.
11
posted on
07/18/2022 8:50:34 PM PDT
by
Jamestown1630
("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
To: Right Wing Vegan
Or,
“Inclusion is ultimately exclusion”
12
posted on
07/18/2022 8:52:20 PM PDT
by
lightman
(I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
To: fwdude
Where a person chooses to insert his private parts has nothing to do with genetically determined skin color.
To: who_would_fardels_bear
14
posted on
07/18/2022 9:07:48 PM PDT
by
Jamestown1630
("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
To: fwdude
*** interracial marriages***
Wait, what?! Clarence Thomas is in an interracial marriage. Do they think he’s gonna say that’s not ok?
15
posted on
07/18/2022 9:08:42 PM PDT
by
FamiliarFace
(I wish “smart resume” would work for the real world so I could FF through the Burden admin BS.)
To: fwdude
More posturing by leftist kooks.
16
posted on
07/18/2022 9:11:31 PM PDT
by
miserare
( Impeach Joe Biden!)
To: lightman
“Inclusion is ultimately exclusion”
Indeed. They love that sh#t. But their time is running out.
17
posted on
07/18/2022 9:13:06 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Vegan
(Pot legalization licenses every degenerate pothead piece of trash to force drug neighbors.)
To: lightman
Or maybe that’s exactly what you were referring to!
18
posted on
07/18/2022 9:16:24 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Vegan
(Pot legalization licenses every degenerate pothead piece of trash to force drug neighbors.)
To: FamiliarFace
Wait, what?! Clarence Thomas is in an interracial marriage. Do they think he’s gonna say that’s not ok? It would show a massive level of legal integrity if Justice Thomas pointed out the flawed legal reasoning in that decision which would undercut his own marriage. Aren't leftists always howling about conflicts of interest in Judges they disagree with? This would be the exact opposite of that.
And not a single state would criminalize interacial marriage if Loving were overturned. Plenty of states would overturn sodomite "marriage" though.
19
posted on
07/18/2022 9:24:44 PM PDT
by
fwdude
(Every time I see someone voluntarily masked in public, I know I'm looking at a vaccinated person.)
To: fwdude
What is ‘race’?
Is there a scientific, biological definition of it?
Or is it just a construct devised to control people politically?
20
posted on
07/18/2022 9:29:36 PM PDT
by
Jamestown1630
("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson