Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

People required to hand over social media accounts to carry a concealed handgun in New York
AP via AL.com ^ | Jul. 08, 2022 | Associated Press

Posted on 07/10/2022 5:02:13 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Mr. Mojo

So, what if a NYS resident doesn’t have any “social media” accounts? Is there a specific legal description of such things?
Email? Messenger? Personal communications likely wouldn’t meet any wild-azzed definition of “ social media”?

As a native NYer, but long time expat, I pity my generation in NY. I came to mo long ago, and fought for our very liberal( in a good sense of the term) weapons and self- defense laws.

Just say no. But don’t move to Missouri, stay there and fight ( legally, rationally and wisely).


41 posted on 07/10/2022 7:04:00 AM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Absolutely. I agree with you. There are a thousand defenses and things that can mitigate a charge. However probably better not to say much that is Public in the first place. I think you might agree.


42 posted on 07/10/2022 7:08:46 AM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Does this mean Twitter, Facebook, FR, DU, et. al. can’t kick you off their site because then the authorities wouldn’t have access to what you wrote that got you kicked off the site?


43 posted on 07/10/2022 7:11:01 AM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
However probably better not to say much that is Public in the first place. I think you might agree.

Respectfully: I do not agree. This would serve as an intimidation-tactic, cooling or denying of the First Amendment. Speak forcefully and without reservation..... although it wasn't me that spoke, so screw you, bureaucrats and your denials. Lawsuit time.

44 posted on 07/10/2022 7:12:41 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The firearms I own today, are the firearms I will die with. How I die will be up to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Not to mention the 4th amendment, Right to Privacy. Social media isn’t exactly private since it’s out there for every one to see, but it’s still your personal account.


45 posted on 07/10/2022 7:20:18 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

I don’t like it.

But you are completely correct.

No jokes. No come backs. No objection. No social media is bad social media.


46 posted on 07/10/2022 7:51:30 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I appreciate your perspective. I agree they the freedom is speech is never infringed. I guess what i am honestly questioning is should there me judgment on what one places on the internet? Can a Facebook page be used to evaluate employment fitness for a private company. When something is voluntarily placed in the public domain is it fair game. The law provides for provisions against some privacies. What is the correct balance?

It is without question the government will overreach. But if I threaten someone on the web can that not be used to determine intent should I follow through? What is allowed to be discovered should I commit a crime? A civil tort?

I tend to think that social media is an awful thing. Firstly, I don’t think anyone particularly cares what I had for dinner last night nor. We’d they the thousand pictures of how it was presented. Secondly, if I am dumb enough to broadcast I am taking a 14 day trip, I just exposed my home to people who know I won’t be there. Thirdly, it is a bit narcissistic to assume that people want to know what I am doing every moment. I rather enjoy my privacy so I am not inclined to post things and why I don’t have internet.

I see social media as willingly sacrificing my privacy.

The founders always promote rights come with responsibilities. You have an absolute right to free speech comes the responsibility to govern yourself so you don’t run afoul of the law. The whole notion of rugged individualism is that the constitution and bill of rights limit what the government can do to the people. It also placed the responsibility of the exercise of the rights of the people on the people. It’s a brilliant system.


47 posted on 07/10/2022 7:53:37 AM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

These political clowns who make these laws, and sign them into law, should be Turing over their own social media accounts, all bank/investment accounts, and all private correspondence, before being allowed to run for public office.


48 posted on 07/10/2022 8:01:38 AM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
People seeking to carry concealed handguns will be required to hand over their social media accounts for a review of their “character and conduct.”

Are people seeking to vote required to do the same? If not, this is unconstitutional law.

But don't expect that to deter Queen Kathy and her Commissars. That train left the station long ago.

49 posted on 07/10/2022 8:05:50 AM PDT by Gritty (The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution. - Saul Alinsky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

She got a A+ rating from the NRA back in the day. So she is an example of a real political whore. Also why you shouldnt join the NRA>


50 posted on 07/10/2022 8:14:03 AM PDT by Yorlik803
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Shady

I have yet to read about any lawsuit.


51 posted on 07/10/2022 8:15:25 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Doesn’t sound like free speech to me.

If it comes at a cost, it’s not free.


52 posted on 07/10/2022 1:35:36 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

“Eff you, That’s My Account!”


53 posted on 07/10/2022 1:36:46 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson