Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pfizer, CDC lied to Americans, FDA-approved COVID shot exists on paper only
Natural Health 365 ^ | June 24, 2022 | Sara Middleton

Posted on 06/27/2022 9:20:40 PM PDT by SecAmndmt

(...)

FDA-approved COVID shots exist only on paper, Pfizer and CDC openly admit that “approved” version of the shot will “not be manufactured or made available”

(...)

(Excerpt) Read more at naturalhealth365.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bigpharma; clickbaitadspam; clotshot; clueless365; conspiracyrepublic; covid; covid19; fraud; karenrepublic; mengeleshot; notanewsarticle; notanewssite; pfizer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: SecAmndmt
The FRoctors here deny.

The day the FDA “approval” letter was released, I posted that it wasn't the vaccine that was being used and the approved vaccine didn't exist. I was told I had a reading comprehension problem.

41 posted on 06/28/2022 6:56:10 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heavy metal

heavy metal wrote: “you’re interrupting, lying to, and pushing drugs on the people who are insisting upon accuracy about the vaccines...”

Pointing out the misinformation and falsehoods peddled by the anti-vaxxers isn’t pushing drugs on anyone.


42 posted on 06/28/2022 6:58:11 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

The day the FDA “approval” letter was released, I posted that it wasn’t the vaccine that was being used and the approved vaccine didn’t exist. I was told I had a reading comprehension problem.


Typical leftist tactic, right there.

And, we see who is pu$hing these horrid $hots....for the leftist agencies and BigPharma.

Coincidence?

I think not. ;-)


43 posted on 06/28/2022 7:03:37 AM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Worldtraveler once upon a time

Worldtraveler once upon a time wrote: “Supposedly. But the CDC and FDA say they are “legally distinct.” So....”

“Finally, addressing the “legally distinct” aspect directly, a Pfizer representative told factcheck.org that the “reference relates to differences in manufacturing — for example, the licensed product may be made at different sites or use materials from different approved suppliers.””

https://lynnwoodtimes.com/2021/10/19/fda-approved-pfizer-comirnaty-vaccine-clarifications/


44 posted on 06/28/2022 7:06:57 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

you’re a liar...

liars don’t have any right to instruct anyone on what’s truth and what isn’t...


45 posted on 06/28/2022 7:10:36 AM PDT by heavy metal (smiling improves your face value and makes people wonder what the hell you're up to... 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bagster

bagster wrote: “Demonstrate that they are, father of lies.”

You’re the one claiming these are deferent so the onus is on you to make the proof.


46 posted on 06/28/2022 7:11:33 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
Typical leftist tactic, right there.

Yep. I figured it was a DUmmie stirring the pot.

47 posted on 06/28/2022 7:13:16 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
You’re the one claiming these are deferent so the onus is on you to make the proof.

No, the onus is on YOU, onus boy. You always neglect the onus when you spew your bio-lab inspired lies during your vax pimping denial tantrums.

WHERE'S THE ONUS?!?!?!?!


48 posted on 06/28/2022 7:15:16 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances

I have to admit, if I had been given that ultimatum, I would have lied to her about receiving the shot. Brainwashed souls should not direct our health decisions. I pray you remain healthy.


49 posted on 06/28/2022 7:20:12 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Thanks for what was already well known. “Legally distinct” means one cannot sue for damages, which explains why Cormirnaty is not being made available in the US. It is a decision made based on avoiding litigation, which you of course know is the reason why “legally” is the adjective chosen.
50 posted on 06/28/2022 7:20:20 AM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Worldtraveler once upon a time

Worldtraveler once upon a time wrote: “Thanks for what was already well known. “Legally distinct” means one cannot sue for damages, which explains why Cormirnaty is not being made available in the US. It is a decision made based on avoiding litigation, which you of course know is the reason why “legally” is the adjective chosen.”

That is simply incorrect.

Quotation begins.
Legally distinct vaccines and liability
It has widely been speculated that the rebranding of Pfizer’s vaccine post-approval was a legal maneuver to shield Pfizer from liability charges. Said speculation stems from a footnote in the same FDA letter to Pfizer that reads, “the [Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines] are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”

At the heart of the claim that Pfizer’s name change was a legal maneuver is a federal law that protects vaccine manufacturers in the event of a public health emergency — like a pandemic. The law is called the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP), and when invoked by the Department of Health and Human Services — which it was in early 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic — “The declaration provides immunity from liability (except for willful misconduct)” for a variety of claims listed on phe.gov.

According to Congressional Research Service, “covered persons are generally immune from legal liability (i.e., they cannot be sued for money damages in court) for losses relating to the administration or use of covered countermeasures against COVID-19,” with the sole exception to the PREP Act being death due to willful misconduct.

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is the agency that oversees compensation programs where individuals can file claims alleging injury or death from vaccination. The COVID-19 vaccines fall under the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).

As HRSA spokesman David Bowman explained to Newsweek, “FDA authorized and approved COVID-19 vaccines, including Comirnaty, are covered countermeasures” under the CICP.

Elaborating further, Bowman said that there “are no liability or compensation differences between a countermeasure approved under an EUA or one that has received full FDA approval.” The theory, then, that Pfizer’s branding was a ploy to evade liability may not hold water as authorized and approved vaccines are both currently covered by the CICP.
Quotation Ends.

https://lynnwoodtimes.com/2021/10/19/fda-approved-pfizer-comirnaty-vaccine-clarifications/

The claims that there exist a difference in liability stems from an interview given by Robert Malone on Bannon’s War Room.

Robert Malone now admits that he was incorrect and admits there is no difference in liability.

“Malone did not respond to our request for comment, but acknowledged in an Aug. 30 tweet that he was “wrong” about the purported differences in liability. Malone told the Washington Post‘s Fact Checker: “On this particular legal liability issue I did not hunt down the details myself, and relied on comments from a third party lawyer which were not fully correct.”

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/08/scicheck-researcher-distorts-facts-on-covid-19-vaccine-approval-liability/


51 posted on 06/28/2022 7:45:29 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: bagster

bagster wrote: “No, the onus is on YOU, onus boy. You always neglect the onus when you spew your bio-lab inspired lies during your vax pimping denial tantrums.”

Did you know that Robert Malone, unlike myself, worked for a bio-lab?


52 posted on 06/28/2022 7:46:34 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Your cited Lynnwood Times article was followed by another two months later.

"Federal Judge rejects Pfizer's interchangeability and questions the existence of Comirnaty" -- December 7, 2021.

https://lynnwoodtimes.com/2021/12/07/federaljudge-rejects-interchangeability-comirnaty/

As to your relying on the fact check, that article notes: "The transition of a vaccine from CICP (an administrative process) to VICP (a legal process) does raise some questions and concerns — including whether those who file under CICP (which has a one-year statute of limitations) will be able to pursue a claim under VICPkey differences, including that the latter comes with the right to an attorney and to appeal."

One year statue of limitations? Versus no liability? The EUAs provide no liability legal claims. Additionally the injuries noted in your fact-check authorities are dwarfed by the VAERS report numbers. And one notes that no legal liability claims are being pursued by those harmed to date that I can find. Ergo, no legal liability. By design.

Now that two-dosed, doubly-boosted Fauci announced his being tested positive for Covid, the claims having been made for these "warp speed" mRNA injections to be "effective" wane, as does both the virus in its variants and the "protection" which they supposedly offer. Except apparently to Fauci, and some millions of others.

Rather than continue exchanges in this vein, perhaps you'd care to cite sources for what "legally distinct" means in the case of the Pfizer-BioNTech still-experimental drug?

53 posted on 06/28/2022 9:57:08 AM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Worldtraveler once upon a time

Worldtraveler once upon a time wrote: “Rather than continue exchanges in this vein, perhaps you’d care to cite sources for what “legally distinct” means in the case of the Pfizer-BioNTech still-experimental drug?”

You’ve been provided that information previously in this thread.
And, a fully approved vaccine cannot be considered ‘experimental’.


54 posted on 06/28/2022 10:04:47 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: bagster
WHERE'S THE ONUS?!?!?!?!

The ONUS™®©?

"Come on up, white boy, I show where the ONUS."

55 posted on 06/28/2022 11:30:44 AM PDT by humblegunner (Ain't drownin', Just wavin'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Not legally they’re not. That also is right there in the FDA “approval”. Just as I posted to you before. And there it is, right on the CDC website. Why re-label, if identical?


56 posted on 06/28/2022 12:11:55 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Cv19 vaccines are Phase 2 of the CCP bioweapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt

SecAmndmt wrote: “Not legally they’re not. That also is right there in the FDA “approval”. Just as I posted to you before. And there it is, right on the CDC website. Why re-label, if identical?”

This is getting tiresome. The answer to your questions has been provided multiple times. You’re just trying to create a justification for not taking the vaccine. Fine, don’t take it. If you’re employer is insisting, then that’s between you and your employer.

Vaccine typical get a new name upon approval.

“What changes with an FDA approval?”
“As part of the FDA approval process, products get a brand name for use in the U.S. (instead of being called the name of the company that developed it). That’s why the Pfizer vaccine is now known as Comirnaty (pronounced Koe-mir’-na-tee). The actual vaccine is the same.”

https://medium.com/wadepthealth/what-does-it-mean-when-a-vaccine-gets-fda-approval-ce0610673954

And this,

Quotation begins.
But the FDA said that “the licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”

Pfizer’s representative told us the “legally distinct” reference relates to differences in manufacturing — for example, the licensed product may be made at different sites or use materials from different approved suppliers.
Quotation ends.

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/08/scicheck-researcher-distorts-facts-on-covid-19-vaccine-approval-liability/


57 posted on 06/28/2022 1:03:09 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Sorry, friend. You’re just not that clever, as proven “previously in this thread.” Apparently your arguments haven’t swayed others in this thread, so “most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.”


58 posted on 06/28/2022 1:35:48 PM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Worldtraveler once upon a time

Worldtraveler once upon a time
Noob since Nov 17, 2021

view n00b page, enter n00b name:

59 posted on 06/28/2022 2:01:56 PM PDT by humblegunner (Ain't drownin', Just wavin'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Worldtraveler once upon a time

Worldtraveler once upon a time wrote: “Sorry, friend. You’re just not that clever, as proven “previously in this thread.” Apparently your arguments haven’t swayed others in this thread, so “most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.””

It’s very difficult to convince members of a conspiracy cult that they’re being scammed. And, yes, there is an anti-vaxxer conspiracy cult here at FR. BTW, what’s your membership number?


60 posted on 06/28/2022 2:13:53 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson