"Federal Judge rejects Pfizer's interchangeability and questions the existence of Comirnaty" -- December 7, 2021.
https://lynnwoodtimes.com/2021/12/07/federaljudge-rejects-interchangeability-comirnaty/
As to your relying on the fact check, that article notes: "The transition of a vaccine from CICP (an administrative process) to VICP (a legal process) does raise some questions and concerns — including whether those who file under CICP (which has a one-year statute of limitations) will be able to pursue a claim under VICPkey differences, including that the latter comes with the right to an attorney and to appeal."
One year statue of limitations? Versus no liability? The EUAs provide no liability legal claims. Additionally the injuries noted in your fact-check authorities are dwarfed by the VAERS report numbers. And one notes that no legal liability claims are being pursued by those harmed to date that I can find. Ergo, no legal liability. By design.
Now that two-dosed, doubly-boosted Fauci announced his being tested positive for Covid, the claims having been made for these "warp speed" mRNA injections to be "effective" wane, as does both the virus in its variants and the "protection" which they supposedly offer. Except apparently to Fauci, and some millions of others.
Rather than continue exchanges in this vein, perhaps you'd care to cite sources for what "legally distinct" means in the case of the Pfizer-BioNTech still-experimental drug?
Worldtraveler once upon a time wrote: “Rather than continue exchanges in this vein, perhaps you’d care to cite sources for what “legally distinct” means in the case of the Pfizer-BioNTech still-experimental drug?”
You’ve been provided that information previously in this thread.
And, a fully approved vaccine cannot be considered ‘experimental’.