SecAmndmt wrote: “Not legally they’re not. That also is right there in the FDA “approval”. Just as I posted to you before. And there it is, right on the CDC website. Why re-label, if identical?”
This is getting tiresome. The answer to your questions has been provided multiple times. You’re just trying to create a justification for not taking the vaccine. Fine, don’t take it. If you’re employer is insisting, then that’s between you and your employer.
Vaccine typical get a new name upon approval.
“What changes with an FDA approval?”
“As part of the FDA approval process, products get a brand name for use in the U.S. (instead of being called the name of the company that developed it). That’s why the Pfizer vaccine is now known as Comirnaty (pronounced Koe-mir’-na-tee). The actual vaccine is the same.”
https://medium.com/wadepthealth/what-does-it-mean-when-a-vaccine-gets-fda-approval-ce0610673954
And this,
Quotation begins.
But the FDA said that “the licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”
Pfizer’s representative told us the “legally distinct” reference relates to differences in manufacturing — for example, the licensed product may be made at different sites or use materials from different approved suppliers.
Quotation ends.
The vaccine labeled Pfizer is unapproved and EUA and is what is currently given in America.
The vaccine labeled Cominarty is sort of approved and is not available.
They’re legally distinct.
I don’t need a reason not to take the mengeleshot. There is certainly no reason for anyone to take it. Except for you.
Does that simplify it for you?
I love how you use factcheck.org, the anti-conservative, anti-liberty, anti-freedom, anti-Constitution outfit which hates Trump and just about everyone here except for you.