Posted on 06/24/2022 7:14:03 AM PDT by nwrep
There is nothing in the Constitution about abortion, and the Constitution does not implicitly protect the right.
Yes, I am checking my body armor for my trip into town... ;-)
I expect attempted violence on scotus no question
They will swarm their neighborhoods
If PP loses federal funding, that’s also a big hit to Demonrat donations. They have a nasty little setup of using our tax dollars to fund PP, which supports Rat congresscritters, who keep the money flowing back to PP. Around and around it goes, completely corrupt!
Maybe this is a turning point, but we will never make up what has been lost.
You could change your last name. LOL.
I moved to SC for a while a long time ago. It was the same way. Particularly in the city of Charleston. You needed family there back to 1776.
Yes. Its states rights.
Missouri already banned it.
“Missouri already banned it”
Saw that....trigger law they call it and I think more states have one also I believe.
The one in Idaho takes effect 30 days from...now.
The Propaganda Media tried to hide the truth that the only participants the Democrats could call on for their riots in 2020 were very damaged individuals, many homeless, who had nothing better to do.
Cell phone video exposed just how mentally compromised the rioters were and countered the Democrats' claim that any significant number of normal people supported them.
The perps shot by Kyle Rittenhouse really exposed how sick these Democrat rioters are.
The "Party of the People" can't repeat that exposure without risking loss of support from people capable enough of donating money, legally or illegally.
After reading the Court Opinion, I believe Alito has been hiding his candle under a bushel and was finally given the instruction by the LORD God to let it shine.
While I have a heading and have to start rereading paragraphs to make sure I didn’t miss anything, it is a work of the ages.
Clarence Thomas was correct in his beliefs throughout the years that Roe VS Wade should fall.
I praise the LORD God for turning the leaking of this Court’s workings early against those who wished to use it to blackmail and/or threaten the Justices!
She would probably have to abstain. She doesn’t know what a woman is.
Use last name Limbaugh in MO.
"Yes, but I'm hopeful your grandkids or greatgrandkids will recognize it and be favorably disposed towards my grandkids."
That’s when they know I’m an outsider, but that I intend to be a fine upstanding credit to our community.
OK, doomers was explained yesterday (it’s stupid) but what the heck is a burner?
You know, I voted for Trump twice, but his appointments…
I guess I’d vote for him if he won the nomination.
We need a real Conservative in there.
/s
Best president in my lifetime!
NeverTrumpers: ESA_O
Thank God.this was long overdue.
time to get on with Kennedy’s gay marriage thing.
why am i seeing articles that say 5-4 and others 6-3 ???
What this poster said. Thank you God for answered prayers.
What a great day in history.
"For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,” Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U. S. ___, ___ (2020) (THOMAS, J.concurring in judgment) (slip op., at 7), we have a duty to “correct the error” established in those precedents have generated."
What is stare decisis but established precedent?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.