Government induced ADE!
(Because a sickly and dependent population is an obedient one.)
Posted on 06/21/2022 6:55:04 AM PDT by Red Badger
Several recent studies have indicated the Covid-19 vaccines actually increase the risk of contracting the disease over time, but these studies have been ignored or even debunked by corporate media and Big Pharma for months. Now, they’ll have to contend with a new study published in the highly respected New England Journal of Medicine.
This study was huge in scale, sifting through data collected from over 100,000 people infected by the Omicron variant. It lends credibility to the statistical significance of the findings, which are absolutely startling. Here are the key points:
* Those who have been “fully vaccinated” with two shots from Moderna or Pfizer are more likely to contract Covid-19 than those who have not been vaccinated at all
* Booster shots offer protection approximately equal to natural immunity, but the benefits wane after 2-5 months
* Natural immunity lasts for at least 300-days, which is the length of the study; it likely lasts much longer
This jibes with the current narrative coming from Big Pharma and their minions in government and corporate media that the jabs are supposed to mitigate the effects. But even that claim has been called into question as recent studies indicate the vaccinated may be dying even more than the unvaccinated. According to The Exposé:
The Government of Canada has confirmed that the vaccinated population account for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 deaths to have occurred across the country since the middle of February 2022, and 70% of those deaths have been among the triple vaccinated population.
Despite the scope of the study and the credibility of the source, it will not receive any attention from corporate media. It is imperative that our readers get the word out because this is an absolute narrative-buster for Big Pharma. Now more than ever, we must alert the people of the truth because we are on the verge of seeing millions of children under the age of five-years-old injected.
The good news is we’ve seen more vaccinated people becoming receptive to the truth. That’s anecdotal, based on what I’m seeing online and the correspondence I receive, but I believe there are more people who are becoming skeptical of governments’ unhinged push for universal vaccinations. If we can share more news that will keep them from getting boosted, and more importantly keep them from jabbing their children, then it’s a worthwhile effort.
If this is, as I believe, part of a nefarious plan to control people and enact the globalist elites’ depopulation agenda, then it behooves us to prevent as many people as possible from getting boosted. The science seems to indicate more shots mean more damage, so limiting exposure is important. We’re going to need allies if things continue down this road. The fewer booster-addicted Americans, the better.
Here are the details regarding the news study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in an article by Marina Zhang from our premium news partners at The Epoch Times:
Vaccination Increases Risk of COVID-19, But Infection Without Vaccination Gives Immunity: Study Having two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine has been linked with negative protection against the disease, scientists say, while a previous infection without vaccination offers around 50 percent immunity, according to a study analyzing the Omicron wave in Qatar.
The study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine on June 15, examined the Omicron wave in Qatar that occurred from around December 2021 to February 2022, comparing vaccination rates and immunity among more than 100,000 Omicron infected and non-infected individuals.
The authors of the study found that those who had a prior infection but no vaccination had a 46.1 and 50 percent immunity against the two subvariants of the Omicron variant, even at an interval of more than 300 days since the previous infection.
However, individuals who received two doses of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine but had no previous infection, were found with negative immunity against both BA.1 and BA.2 Omicron subvariants, indicating an increased risk of contracting COVID-19 than an average person.
Over six months after getting two doses of the Pfizer vaccine, immunity against any Omicron infection dropped to -3.4 percent. But for two doses of the Moderna vaccine, immunity against any Omicron infection dropped to -10.3 percent after more than six months since the last injection.
Though the authors reported that three doses of the Pfizer vaccine increased immunity to over 50 percent, this was measured just over 40 days after the third vaccination, which is a very short interval. In comparison, natural immunity persisted at around 50 percent when measured over 300 days after the previous infection, while immunity levels fell to negative figures 270 days after the second dose of vaccine.
These figures indicate a risk of waning immunity for the third vaccine dose as time progresses.
The findings are supported by another recent study from Israel that also found natural immunity waned significantly more slowly compared to artificial, or vaccinated, immunity. The study found that both natural and artificial immunity waned over time.
Individuals that were previously infected but not vaccinated had half the risks of reinfection as compared to those that were vaccinated with two doses but not infected.
“Natural immunity wins again,” Dr. Martin Adel Makary, a public policy researcher at Johns Hopkins University, wrote on Twitter, referring to the Israeli study.
“Among persons who had been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, protection against reinfection decreased as the time increased,” the authors concluded, “however, this protection was higher” than protection conferred in the same time interval through two doses of the vaccine.
For many people, this is the deal killer.
One of the most vital and important (yet perhaps boring) elements in legitimate clinical trials, is the consistent, routine, accurate, and timely collection and recording of side-effect and efficacy data. Trials usually run from two to ten years, with meaningfully large test and control groups. Indeed, the FDA's own websites clearly state that "It's the clinical trials that take so long--usually several years," says Sandra Kweder, M.D., deputy director of the Office of New Drugs in the CDER.
NONE of these shots underwent legitimate clinical trials. This is not insignificant: vaccines fail trials 59% of the time and take a median of 9 years.
With all this data being collected soberly, a full assessment of the benefits AND side effects can be determined. Things like adverse effects, fatalities, and the like can be observed AND recorded and also vetted (maybe Bob wasn't killed by the shot...or maybe he was).
Absent any legit data collection and long-term trials, we must rely on citizen reporting. I see a plethora of "died suddenly" articles. Are they dead because of the shots? I don't know. It's compelling. And yet a Greek Chorus of naysayers blast such reporting and claim that people have died suddenly forever. Maybe that's true, but in the absence of a legitimate trial, simply blowing off the hypothesis doesn't make it go away.
I had one FReeper argue that we simply couldn't wait nine years...people needed a "cure" NOW. Fair enough...,it's not like the FDA is efficient, and I could see an army of snowflakes rioting if they heard that a possible "cure" was being suppressed while awaiting the outcome of a nine year trial.
Instead of a fully transparent press release ("These shots have a 95% in-sample VE, but it's a new technology and VE will likely decline over time AND if your big toe falls off in three years or you turn into a wear wolf, don't cry for me Argentina"). But these shot were held up as Manna from Heaven, when in reality they were secular bread mix that had barely been poured into the bread maker.
I don't believe 1/3 of the people who took the shots will be dead in 5 years. But I also don't call a baseball game after one inning of play.
But the vax shills will tell you that this is entirely expected, because 4 in every 5 Canadians are vaxxed. You're not supposed to point out that this is still more proof that the "vaccines" are at best useless, and at worst, causing more damage than they "prevent".
“Despite the scope of the study and the credibility of the source”
LOL the NOQ Report citing the DailyExpose.uk as a source.
None of this matters since no one is dying of Covid anymore, but there is no “study” showing the vaccines are not effective. If there is please post a link to it. The daily expose repeatedly takes UK statistics and ignores that 1) old people were prioritized for the vaccine and old people are more likely to die (DUH), and within age groups those with risk factors (cancer, liver disease, heart problems, diabetes) were prioritized for the vaccine, and these people are more likely to die. I don’t care if anyone else takes the vaccine but the Expose is so obviously full of BS. Think.
I was forced by my employer to get a jab last year. I elected for the J&J one timer. Glad I did. No way I’m gonna sit still for any type of booster or any forced compliance. No way.
The jabs created a gain of function on a man made Coronavirus. Even the true believers should notice the virus no longer follows seasonality patterns and the countries with the highest percentages of jabbed continue at an elevated level of infection with no sign of herd immunity.
These jabs allow infection and transmission. A virus constantly mutates. This experiment should have been stopped long ago
[[I don’t believe 1/3 of the people who took the shots will be dead in 5 years]]
I don’t either, but I do think there is a very possibility that the vaccines could be causing serious health issues in some, not all of course. I think there is growing evidence that the shots might be the cause of heart problems in some.
Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine.
The first thing I thought about when I read this line was the scene in the book (not the movie) "Battlefield Earth" where the tribe lived close to a radiated site and were all sickly and died early. They were all dependent on the tribal leaders for just about everything. Once the hero convinced them to move, they all became healthier and recovered. The leaders did not last long after that.
My son had to take the shot for his job.
Now is dealing with high blood pressure. He is 27.
I agree tosl,y, and it’s a shame that ALL Republicans aren’t vehemently opposing them for thst very reason. There is no good reason to inoculate infsnts and children, and there are reasons to avoid it. Republicans should be screaming about this every opportunity they get, even if there is nothing they can do to stop it. Their silence implies complicity. It is a dangerous and harmful assault on our kids for NO valid reason, and Republicans should be furious over it, and every republican state should ban the vaccines for all young, and only allow them for sick and elderly IF they want to get it (but they should be made well aware of the fsct that the vsccines might not be safe).
Hybrid? WTF?
Over what time periods?
Where is your evidence? Maybe you forgot to post the link/s.
My employer tried that one. I outlasted them, and on the day they were to terminate me, they relented and kept me on.
“Where is your evidence? Maybe you forgot to post the link/s.”
The link is the OP study. In didn’t forget to post the link since my data was from the OP link which you didn’t read.
“..Those were the people that Fauci et al tried to vilify and destroy...”
All to enrich themselves at the expense of thousands, if not millions, of innocent lives.
They should all be arrested, tried, sentenced and publicly hanged for it.
“Hybrid? WTF?”
Both as I posted.
Good work.
My wife and I both decided that my health was more important than my job.
From the study:
“CONCLUSIONS No discernable differences in protection against symptomatic BA.1 and BA.2 infection were seen with previous infection, vaccination, and hybrid immunity. Vaccination enhanced protection among persons who had had a previous infection. Hybrid immunity resulting from previous infection and recent booster vaccination conferred the strongest protection. (Funded by Weill Cornell Medicine–Qatar and others.)”
Of course natural immunity and hybrid immunity can only be achieved by first contracting COVID. Vaccination does not require catching COVID.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.