To: Pollard
The agreement also establishes a more rigorous background check process for people aged 18 to 21, with enhanced review that includes contacting state and local law enforcement for criminal records that could be disqualifying, and to appropriate state organizations for mental health information that could impact the decision.
2 posted on
06/12/2022 9:00:48 AM PDT by
Pollard
(If there's a question mark in the headline, the answer should always be No.)
To: Pollard
I’m okay with this. And I’m a 1 percenter, veteran, gun owner, lawyer—but most of all a parent and fed up with mass shootings.
73 posted on
06/12/2022 10:56:17 AM PDT by
guido911
To: Pollard
”The agreement also establishes a more rigorous background check process for people aged 18 to 21, …” I predict that the upper age limit will quickly disappear and all adults will face consequences for misbehavior as a minor.
Some liberal heads will explode when they try to balance the need to protect people from the consequences of early transgressions against the need to deprive some people of their right to keep and bear arms.
The ex-post-facto issue will also be very entertaining. There will be people claiming that they never would have pled guilty if they knew additional punishment would be imposed years later.
To: Pollard
143 posted on
06/12/2022 6:52:32 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Pollard
This sounds like something that the House will shoot down in a nanosecond.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson