Skip to comments.
Convincing: 77% believe 2000 Mules, and 20M have seen it
Washington Examiner ^
| June 03, 2022
| Paul Bedard,
Posted on 06/05/2022 8:13:13 AM PDT by george76
Dinesh D’Souza’s election fraud documentary, 2000 Mules, is bolstering concerns among millions of voters that the Trump-Biden election was rife with problems that could have led to a different turnout.
In a new Rasmussen Reports survey on the film shared with Secrets, 77% said that the movie “strengthened their conviction that there was systematic and widespread election fraud in the 2020 election.”
And that is significant because the poll also suggested that over 20 million voters have viewed the documentary that debuted last month at Florida’s Mar-a-Lago resort, former President Donald Trump’s winter residence.
Through interviews and videos, D’Souza makes the case that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump. Mostly liberal critics, especially in the media, have tried to pick it apart.
But the Rasmussen results show that the documentary has a very large audience who feel vindicated in agreeing with Trump that Democratic hanky-panky helped President Joe Biden win.
The poll analysis said, “Nineteen percent (19%) of Republicans, 14% of Democrats, and 11% of voters not affiliated with either major party report having watched 2000 Mules. Awareness of the new documentary is much more widespread, with 41% of voters saying they’ve heard about 2000 Mules. That includes 50% of Republicans, 36% of Democrats, and 38% of unaffiliated voters.”
That works out to over 15% of the nearly 160 million who voted in 2020.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 2000; 2000mules; dineshdsouza; election; electionfraud; fraud; mules
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: Observator
Is it too much to ask that out of 2,000 Mules, at least 20 be ID’d as a result of geolocation data? You’d think if their proximity to drop boxes could be established, their home addresses would be even easier. That information would require a warrant.
In pre-coup America, law enforcement agencies across the country would have obtained such warrants on suspicion of felonies committed during the election; they would have then questioned the individuals to whom those numbers belonged.
In post-coup America, where our law enforcement agencies have proven to be either grossly incompetent or grossly corrupt, one can no longer rely on them to prosecute wrongdoing, particularly any wrongdoing tied to our elections.
41
posted on
06/05/2022 10:38:44 AM PDT
by
Captain Walker
("If you think tough men are dangerous, wait until you see what weak men are capable of."- J Peterson)
To: Captain Walker
That information would require a warrant.
It'd require a warrant to arrest them. I'm talking about identifying them - and not by law enforcment - by Dinesh and True the Vote. They have the geolocation data, so why not identify at least the top 1% of most suspicious mules?
It's not like others suspected of voters fraud (I'm thinking of the GA election workers) weren't identified.
To: george76
“Only 20 million have seen it”
Of the dozens of people I know who have seen it, and “are convinced”, only a couple paid for it — the rest streamed it off “illegitimate” sites.
A lot more than 20 million have seen it.
To: george76
And now we have a conviction in Yuma based on the video.
44
posted on
06/05/2022 11:01:16 AM PDT
by
pfflier
To: pfflier
And now we have a conviction in Yuma based on the video.
You'd need to provide a link for me to be certain - but I've heard this repeated a fair bit. The individual in Yuma I believe you are referring to was indicted in 2020 and recently plead guilty.
To: Observator
It'd require a warrant to arrest them. I'm talking about identifying them - and not by law enforcment - by Dinesh and True the Vote. They have the geolocation data, so why not identify at least the top 1% of most suspicious mules? The information they have is nothing more than an incoherent set of numbers/letters; they can't "see" who is behind them.
This information can only be pulled from the phone carriers, and they will only provide it if presented a warrant for the information.
46
posted on
06/05/2022 11:05:18 AM PDT
by
Captain Walker
("If you think tough men are dangerous, wait until you see what weak men are capable of."- J Peterson)
To: Captain Walker
The information they have is nothing more than an incoherent set of numbers/letters; they can't "see" who is behind them.
You're right- that's what deidentified data is. They replace the name with a generated number - say "12345". And the data analysts can see the geo-locations 12345 visited based on phone signals. 12345 is identified as a mule because he went to a specific drop box location repeatedly. That location however, is not incoherent information - otherwise how would you know they were near ballot boxes?
12345 also goes to sleep at night, presumably most nights in their house. If you know an address, anyone can identify the resident with a simple web search.
Bottom line - if True the Vote feels they can prove 12345 swung by a specific ballot box repeatedly, they can definitely determine where they live.
To: Captain Walker; Observator
If you have an iPhone, enter *#06# on your phone's dial pad; you will see exactly what Treadstone (and True the Vote) sees if they are surveilling cell phones.
This is all anyone has who has picked up your phone through any kind of geo-locating devices; this information is meaningless without input from the phone carriers.
48
posted on
06/05/2022 11:16:50 AM PDT
by
Captain Walker
("If you think tough men are dangerous, wait until you see what weak men are capable of."- J Peterson)
To: Observator
49
posted on
06/05/2022 11:18:49 AM PDT
by
pfflier
To: Observator
Bottom line - if True the Vote feels they can prove 12345 swung by a specific ballot box repeatedly, they can definitely determine where they live. They can only tell where a cell phone was or is; tying the cell phone to an individual with certainty would require something more tangible (like a name on an agreement).
50
posted on
06/05/2022 11:22:54 AM PDT
by
Captain Walker
("If you think tough men are dangerous, wait until you see what weak men are capable of."- J Peterson)
To: pfflier
Thanks - I read the link. As I suspected, this story that is getting recycled has some fine print you should be aware of:
Fuentes and a second woman were indicted in December 2020 on one count of ballot abuse
It's rather disingenuous for 2,000 Mules to take credit for this based on the timeline, obviously.
To: Captain Walker
They can only tell where a cell phone was or is
I agree. And - if during bedtime hours a cellphone can be traced to a physical address for 8 hours - you have a good chance at identifying an address. That is an order of magnitude less precise than a ballot box.
And if you can identify an address, in many if not most cases you can identify a person.
To: Observator
True the vote was working with David Lara (Yuma County patriot who has been complaining about this for years) in 2020. He gives credit to True the Vote for the action on this, as I recall.
I know David, and have heard him on the local radio station show a month ago or so. Which is where I got this information from.
To: Observator
And if you can identify an address, in many if not most cases you can identify a person. To a fairly high degree of certainty, yes.
To a legal standard? Probably not.
To: M_Continuum
Bidens whole job is to fiddle while Rome burns. That’s why they chose two folks who have no political future.
* * *
That explains what’s going on very well. M_Continuum. Thanks.
55
posted on
06/05/2022 11:30:11 AM PDT
by
poconopundit
(Hard oak fist in an Irish velvet glove: Kayleigh the Shillelagh we salute your work!)
To: marktwain
He gives credit to True the Vote for the action on this, as I recall.
I have no doubt he's a patriot and gives credit to True the Vote, but it doesn't change the fact these people were caught a year before 2,000 Mules was released.
To: Captain Walker
Seemed to work out for IDing people who went to DC on Jan. 6, 2021.
57
posted on
06/05/2022 11:34:14 AM PDT
by
jjotto
( Blessed are You LORD, who crushes enemies and subdues the wicked.)
To: jpsb; Menehune56
A bigger issue is Bedard is ignoring Rasmussen's likely voter screen, which is always the wild card in their polls.
How are they deciding who's likely to vote in 2024?
You can't extrapolate like this from a population you can't define.
58
posted on
06/05/2022 11:35:01 AM PDT
by
semimojo
To: jjotto
Seemed to work out for IDing people who went to DC on Jan. 6, 2021. And who is doing the IDing? Law enforcement.
(I've never said that the cell phone info gleaned by True the Vote is incorrect. I have only pointed out that what TTV has does not identify (with the certainty that is necessary) the individual behind that phone identifier; this can only be done with input from the phone carrier.)
59
posted on
06/05/2022 11:45:41 AM PDT
by
Captain Walker
("If you think tough men are dangerous, wait until you see what weak men are capable of."- J Peterson)
To: bitt
DAMIT! Try and try to create an account on TS. They say, “We sent you an email.” None sent. They keep saying this. Is someone redirecting messages or WTH is going on? Anyone?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson