[Captain Walker]

It'd require a warrant to arrest them. I'm talking about identifying them - and not by law enforcment - by Dinesh and True the Vote. They have the geolocation data, so why not identify at least the top 1% of most suspicious mules?

The information they have is nothing more than an incoherent set of numbers/letters; they can't "see" who is behind them.

This information can only be pulled from the phone carriers, and they will only provide it if presented a warrant for the information.

[Observator]

The information they have is nothing more than an incoherent set of numbers/letters; they can't "see" who is behind them.

You're right- that's what deidentified data is. They replace the name with a generated number - say "12345". And the data analysts can see the geo-locations 12345 visited based on phone signals. 12345 is identified as a mule because he went to a specific drop box location repeatedly. That location however, is not incoherent information - otherwise how would you know they were near ballot boxes?

12345 also goes to sleep at night, presumably most nights in their house. If you know an address, anyone can identify the resident with a simple web search.

Bottom line - if True the Vote feels they can prove 12345 swung by a specific ballot box repeatedly, they can definitely determine where they live.

[Captain Walker]

If you have an iPhone, enter *#06# on your phone's dial pad; you will see exactly what Treadstone (and True the Vote) sees if they are surveilling cell phones.

This is all anyone has who has picked up your phone through any kind of geo-locating devices; this information is meaningless without input from the phone carriers.