[Captain Walker]

Is it too much to ask that out of 2,000 Mules, at least 20 be ID’d as a result of geolocation data? You’d think if their proximity to drop boxes could be established, their home addresses would be even easier.

That information would require a warrant.

In pre-coup America, law enforcement agencies across the country would have obtained such warrants on suspicion of felonies committed during the election; they would have then questioned the individuals to whom those numbers belonged.

In post-coup America, where our law enforcement agencies have proven to be either grossly incompetent or grossly corrupt, one can no longer rely on them to prosecute wrongdoing, particularly any wrongdoing tied to our elections.

[Observator]

That information would require a warrant.

It'd require a warrant to arrest them. I'm talking about identifying them - and not by law enforcment - by Dinesh and True the Vote. They have the geolocation data, so why not identify at least the top 1% of most suspicious mules?

It's not like others suspected of voters fraud (I'm thinking of the GA election workers) weren't identified.

[Betty Jane]

I wish they would have identified the non profits or at least list which nonprofits are at the addresses where the mules picked up the ballots.