Good timing on that, hey?
So, what is the down side for our side?
Whoever decided to do,this needs to be in a mental,institute, but first sued for further endangering students especially in light of what just happened.
I can’t be,eive how mental peopl,e have become these days- they truly are a danger to society along with the violent students or perps who threaten the schools. Every republicanmin California should be screaming out “are you friggin kidding us? You can’t be serious! You need to step down NOW!”
> “Once students make contact with law enforcement, they are less likely to graduate high school... <
Well, then maybe they shouldn’t be attacking, assaulting, or threatening anyone in the first place.
I don’t know who many sensible people are left in California. But I sure do feel sorry for them.
I remember the Marjorie Stoneham Douglas HS slaughter. I also remember Sheriff Scott Israel of Broward County and seeing videos of him and his top lieutenant attending Muslim outreach get-togethers and all the 'Inshallahs' bandied about in the midst of their department campaign (along with the HS principal et al) to get to 'troubled' teens and keep them out of the system.
Yep, Israel and his department and the HS 'kept them out of the system'. Until they didn't. IIRC, there were over 20 incidents with the ultimate killer, none of them forwarded to the FBI and only the very last one was passed upwards - far too late.
This is what California is heading for.
They want more school shootings so they can justify taking away everyone’s guns.
Why, it’s almost like they WANT more school shootings.
So they won’t “red flag” a student who actually threatens a school shooting, but they want to “red flag” anyone reported to the government by an anonymous, unverifiable stranger?
In St. Louis, the NAACP is enlisting the help of the DOJ to investigate police pursuits, since they’re has been a rash of “runners” that have hurt or killed innocent motorists.
I mean, you could start by publicly speaking out about accepting responsibility and not taking off from the police in the first place.
They should just double the number of “Gun Free Zone” signs. That’ll take care of it. Right?
Whatever is good or smart, don’t do that. Whatever is bad or dumb to do, do that. That’s the credo of the unsleepy.
Eh ???
Too many urban Amish getting reported. Looked bad.
They end “Mandatory” reporting, but not “Selective” reporting.
They mentioned race throughout the entire debate, I wonder when little Orangejello or Taquinta make threats if they will be treated differently than Michael or Andrew will due to racial disparity they are trying to overcome.
If minority students are disproportionally affected by this reporting of violent threats it is because they are disproportionally making the threats.
Those who don’t threaten don’t get reported. DUH !
They make it sound like threatening students won’t graduate from high school if cops respond to their making the threats.
Those students who threaten school violence are not exactly those who care about their formal education. Besides, those who DO graduate often cannot read their own diplomas. They are functionally illiterate.
These troublemakers might as well be diverted early into Gang Warfare 101 rather than be coddled inside a public school where some students WANT to learn.
“Once students make contact with law enforcement, they are less likely to graduate high school and more likely to wind up in jail or prison.
= = =
Once a student shoots up a school, he is less likely to graduate and more likely to end up in jail or prison, or dead.
I personally know that they bend over backwards to graduate students in LA..the reason is that funding is tied to the particular high school’s graduation rate. They also do not suspend students unless absolutely necessary, because, again, funding is cut to the school if they suspend “too many” students.
Bass Ackwards.
California must be jealous of the Texas slaughter and all the attention Texas got... This is an evil. It’ll create more deaths.
Wow. Just wow.