Posted on 05/28/2022 3:44:57 PM PDT by aimhigh
In recent days, out-homosexual Tim Miller wrote a piece at the increasingly odd website known as The Bulwark. Miller was writing about the ongoing Sussmann trial where special prosecutor John Durham is making the case that the Hillary Clinton campaign played a direct role in various hoaxes that enveloped our country and the presidency of Donald J. Trump.
Without getting too deep in the weeds, former Clinton adviser Robby Mook testified that Hillary approved the spreading of various lies about a computer connection between the Trump campaign and something called the Alfa Bank in Moscow. This was misinformation peddled by the Clinton campaign to the FBI that turned into FBI surveillance of Hillary’s political opponent. Miller wrote that Mook’s testimony “has the Trump crowd rubbing their nipples.”
What? Rubbing their nipples? Understand that Miller was a top aide to Jeb Bush during the 2016 campaign. He also worked for John McCain. And he also had a rather high position at the Republican National Committee. Is it any wonder that there seems to be a homosexual ascendancy in certain quarters of the “conservative” movement?
(Excerpt) Read more at crisismagazine.com ...
non sequitur
These aren’t “conservatives” - they’re RINOs at best and Democrat plants at worst.
Trust the Bulwark at your own risk.
Conversion or infiltration?
I do not believe that homosexuals are outnumbering conservatives in the so-called political right. However, I do believe that populists are beginning to outnumber social conservatives. Or, at the least, they are using bigger microphones. That might change at some point. Populists are easily swayed. Social conservatives are not.
No.
Andrew Sullivan (at least he was at the start)
David Brock (when he was attacking Anita Hill)
Morrissey
Dave Rubin
Douglas Murray
Log Cabin Republicans
Tammy Bruce
Linda Grahamnesty
Love the Sinner.
Hate the Sin.
The Constitution is not a religious document.
Support it, and we’re friends.
Republicans always used Christians for votes but never delivered on much.
The one populist opinion that most gay "conservatives" share is anti-immigration, especially with respect to Muslims who want to imprison and/or kill them.
It's more about self-preservation than gullibility.
Also, some gays tend to share conservatives' love for classic music, literature, architecture, etc. while others are very moderne.
Christians are to the GOP as blacks are to the Democrats.
yes, they are, and if you act like a Christian in the GOP and say homosexuality is sin, you are called a hater.
Trump even placed a gay man in the cabinet, Grenell.
I told you guys, it was about his personal morality.
It’s good to have Tammy Bruce on our side.
The Bulwark is nor conservative, it’s Bush League.
Only Tammy Bruce is a conservative out of that group.
Any reason to wonder about Breitbart? I’d feel better if there wasn’t.
I think conservatism is drawing people from all demographics.
It’s why Deep State has to steal elections.
The traditional view of Rockefeller Republicans toward social conservatives is that they want their votes but not their values. Social conservatives have long been the red-headed stepchildren of the Republican Party.
Populism, for all its faults, at least has a record of winning elections, e.g. Trump.
A populist candidate is more likely to make the socon voting bloc happy by giving them some of the things they ask for, rather than neocons who just use issues like abortion as a carrot forever dangling in front of their noses.
When you embrace homosexuality, you lay upon yourself and your nation a curse.
People who advocate for the demonic practice are cursed.
A true conservative would never align with that group.
You might as well align with Jihadists and Commie usurpers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.