It reminds me of Willy Wonka in the Augustus Gloop scene:
Posted on 05/11/2022 6:49:19 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, on Tuesday called the protests outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes “reprehensible” in an interview.
“I think it’s reprehensible. Stay away from homes and families of elected officials and members of the court,” the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman told CNN when he was asked about his thoughts on the protests.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
It’s illegal, Dick.
He’s just worried they’ll storm his home eventually. Which they will.
Notice how he put staying away from homes of elected officials first. Is he anticipating the Dems getting a taste of their own medicine?
It reminds me of Willy Wonka in the Augustus Gloop scene:
The internal polling among Democrats must be telling them, protesting outside Supreme Court Justice’s homes is not a good idea, otherwise he wouldn’t be saying anything.
If a few more big time Democrats join in, you will know it’s bad for Democrats.
He’s lying. Has he EVER condemned near riots outside courthouses across the country during trials of interest to the radicals in Black Lies Matter and Antifa? Has he EVER condemned Black Lies Matter and Antifa who “protest” outside the homes of judges and politicians who have dared to offend them in some way? I don’t think so.
It's such a tried and true, poll tested phrase that Paul Shanklin even put together a parody of Robert Palmer's, "Simply Irresistable," titled, "Simply Reprehensible," sung in his best Barney Frank voice.
Talk is cheap. Action or you’re a liar.
What needs to happen is some pro-life demonstrators need to gather and protest outside of the homes of Kagan, Breyer, and Sotomayor.
Yep, it sure looks that way to me:
"Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."
Why isn't Merrick Garland all over this? Where's the FBI?
Yes. If he were genuine he would have said something to the effect of staying away from everyone’s home.
Because I’m sure he has no problem with the mob showing up at Carlson’s home.
Or with that skank doxxing folks that are contrary to his party’s goals and agenda.
What! Dick(less) Turdbin is against the protests!?!
Did he get permission from Shekles to break ranks?
This could be one of two things or both. The polling data is in and it’s brutal to the rats or word has gotten back that a judge flipped.
That surprises me. He never thinks or speaks logically.
Hey dick, grow a real conscience and condemn the Jan 6 persecution, the jury intimidation/tampering that blm did during the Chauvin dham trial, etc. When you grow a conscience, lemme know. Your weak condemnation of the protests,outside judges houses ain’t gonna cut it
Except for the little detail that it's illegal.
And you know which group would get hauled off to jail.
lol
no. stop.
Virginia State and Federal
It is illegal to protest near the homes of judges, but is it illegal about the homes of politicians? I don’t think that either should be done, however.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.