Basically forced to say it at the point if a gun.
Corruption in the court.
Keyword is widespread. When massive fraud is committed in small locations, it’s not widespread. It was massive.
But WE ALL SAW THEM DO IT!?!
I have to confess I don’t watch much of any Western media anymore. They can’t even get the weather right.
The Left’s trick is to throw in the qualifier “widespread”. Nobody ever asserted widespread voter fraud. There was “narrowspread” voter fraud in a few critical and corrupt counties. That was enough to give Biden a “landslide” electoral win. Widespread means countrywide voter fraud which no one ever said happened.
And the Inquisition forced Galileo to swear that the Sun revolved around the Earth.
The results of this investigation indicate that Ruby Freeman and Wandrea ‘Shaye’ Moss did not engage in ballot fraud or criminal misconduct,” ...............OK, they are innocent. Now lets find the guilty ones. s/
Yeah, there was plenty enough ballot and tabulation fraud to throw the election and that’s what they did.
Yet for 4 years we got that there was voter fraud in 2016, “mountains of evidence according to a scumbag named A damn Schitt and it was all based on a lie, a hoax. Anyone apologise for that yet? Anyone held accountable? Anyone sued? What a joke
An admission under duress is never to be believed, it isn’t a sincere admission.
I agree, these ladies are the smoking gun and somebody got to somebody and paid them to settle. We are going into darkest of times if this is the new normal.
I saw her commit fraud with my own eyes.
That burns my grits.
Under duress.
The article keeps adding more qualifications to what was admitted to. Its headline is so much more general its effectively a lie. If a couple suspects turn out to be innocent of a crime it is dishonest to equate that with no crime being committed by anyone.
The folks who don’t want you watching Fox, Newsmax and all the rest, can add OAN to their list. Now you end up with nothing.
Confirmed: B R O K E N. The Left won.
It was key point fraud. Generally speaking, only certain parts of swing states saw the massive finagling of the federal office vote count. The mail-in/bundling-friendly states like CA and OR merely ran their fraudulent elections as they normally do, no matter who’s running for president. I don’t think anyone has questioned California’s vote counting since Bob Dornan lost his seat to Sanchez via fraud.
We need a few good, strong, effective republicans.
I used to think this would be uncovered and the truth found out.
I guess I was expecting too much.
Misleading headline. They left out the “Widespread” and “by Georgia Election Workers” part.
We can argue over what constitutes “widespread”. It doesn’t take that many who are dirty to run through a bunch of invalid ballots. So an election can clearly be stolen and yet not that many of the poll workers needed to be corrupt in order for that to be true. That’s especially so in an election decided by 10,000 ballots.
Also, election workers could be completely on the up and up and yet an election could still be tainted by massive fraud - as 2,000 Mules amply demonstrates. The massive fraud operation uncovered with irrefutable evidence shown in that documentary did not require the participation of any poll workers.
In America 2.0 if you report that an election was stolen you have to pay millions of dollars to the people that stole it.