[ChicagoConservative27]

Joe has full going full retard for too long now

[TornadoAlley3]

Mika made him do it.

[rrrod]

I don’t believe the RATs have the votes.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

Pull a ‘King Solomon,’ Chuckie! Just cut those babies in half!

Oh, wait...

In reality, I’d LIKE a public Congressional vote. Let the Baby Killers wave their Freak Flags for all the world to see!

(They’ll never do it...)

[samadams2000]

Wait, is this the dead intern guy who left his family for that DC harlot?

[cotton1706]

It won’t be “bipartisan.” It will be liberals voting for liberal legislation.

It’ll be Democrats and Collins and Murkowski.

That’s not “bipartisan” that is, representatives with different points of view coming together on a piece of legislation.

It’ll be totally partisan.

[pepsi_junkie]

If you're an aspiring democrat strategist, like Scarborough, then this is brilliant advice. He anticipates (correctly) that many, maybe most republicans in congress actually support abortion no matter what their campaign rhetoric says. So if Schumer schedules a vote it's a total win-win for him. He will get ALL the dems to vote yes and make the base satisfied. And he will force republicans to either vote to support abortion or not. Most will NOT want to go on record either way. Sure, they talk a lot but most of what they say are lies (see: six years of all of them proising their #1 priority was "Repeal and Replace Obamacare" until they could actually do it and refused to even have a vote on it).

Basically such a vote would put a lot of GOP members in a very uncomfortable spot. So why wouldn't dems want to do that?

[dfwgator]

What a fraud this guy was when he was a “Republican”.

[StAnDeliver]

Bring it up for a Senate vote, but beforehand, Miotch should yield time to Cotton or Ernst (even better), to read Schumer's direct threat to the Justices of the Supreme Court into the Senate Record:

"On March 4, 2020, on the steps of the Supreme Court building, Sen. Chuck Schumer directly threatened the lives of Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh, for abortion-related decision-making."

"Speaking to a crowd on the Supreme Court steps, the leading Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer declared: “I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you, if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

[HighSierra5]

I can’t stand that SOB. Please don’t post anything about him again.

[MrRelevant]

Doesnt he understand.... hes advocating for the death of kids. This is not really a bipartisan issue. Let states that want it have it by vote....otherwise keep the Feds out. Thats the beauty of America that is often forgotten. If you dont like where you are , theres another state not too far away that probably is the polar opposite of where you are at...so move.

[apillar]

Someone should ask Joe, how do you get 60% of what you want in codifying Roe v. Wade into law? It seems a rather black or white issue. Would a compromise make abortion legal six months out of the year? Every weekday between Wednesday and Saturday?

Besides, there is no way ANY abortion bill would get 10 Republican votes to break a filibuster in the Senate as there are only 2-3 Republicans that are even remotely pro-Abortion. So they goes back to ending the filibuster, and if Schumer can end the filibuster then he will certainly go for the whole loaf rather than a compromise (but he can't or he would have already done so).

[adorno]

There haven’t been any wins during the Biden years, and there haven’t been any wins during the takeover by the democrats of congress,

so...

what wins is Scarborough talking about?

FACT is that, a vote to codify Roe v Wade or national abortions, does not have enough members of congress to get passed.

Scarborough has been left without a brain ever since republicans repudiated him and ever since ‘he became a democrat’.

[DoughtyOne]

And the deaths, just keep on comin!

[Pete Dovgan]

So I guess nobody actually read the document by drafted by Alito.

Alito and the majority opinion says that it’s a State Right essentially, and was never a SCOTUS right or Federal right. Power to the people means power to State Legislatures which are closest to the electorate.

Even If Schumer passed some legislation granting abortion, it would be seen as an usurpation of State’s rights at this point. No different than SCOTUS ursurpation that Alito says was wrong. Besides, new Congress means the law could be struck down and a new law created easily. Then what, complete Ban on Abortion?

People need to come to terms with how this should be handled. Either in your state, or draft an Amendment and go through the process. Bypassing the Constitution hasn’t worked for anyone thus far, and it won’t hold up with a ‘new law’ at the House and Senate level either.

[Gene Eric]

Was the intern pregnant?

[rottweiller_inc]

Most politicians are for abortion if only because it allows them to either get rid of an inconvenience if they’re a woman or to get rid of their mistresses baby and avoid problems with the Mrs. if there are men

[chuckee]

Sorry, but other than the usual senate Republican suspects, there is no way Schumer is going to design a compromise to get 60 votes to get around a filibuster. He can’t even get Manchin and Sinema right now to go along with a pro abortion bill. Whore Scarborough knows this as well as he also knows how to sing for his paycheck to please his paymasters.

[Rastus]

Remember when this guy was a conservative Republican?

Me neither.

[MCSETots]

Not sure how abortion affects Joe. He probably is in capable of making a baby and Mika is . . . well, Mika . . .

[MCSETots]

Not sure how abortion affects Joe. He probably is incapable of making a baby and Mika is . . . well, Mika . . .