Posted on 05/03/2022 7:47:04 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The drive to declare a “climate emergency” has swept much of the world. According to the Climate Emergency Declaration website:
“2,094 jurisdictions in 38 countries have declared a climate emergency. Populations covered by jurisdictions that have declared a climate emergency amount to over 1 billion citizens.”
But the “emergency” is nowhere to be found in the real world.
After all, the so-called “Global Average Temperature” has only risen about 1.2 degrees Celsius since 1880 despite a nearly 50% rise in CO2 levels in the atmosphere. Yet, it was during this period when one would expect the most temperature increase due to CO2 rise. In reality, however, there has obviously been very little warming and what warming has occurred has been of significant benefit to humanity and the biosphere as we pulled out of the miserable Little Ice Age. Scientists such as Princeton University physics professor Dr. William Happer show that even a doubling of today’s CO2 levels in the atmosphere would cause very little temperature rise but would cause a huge benefit to increasing productivity of the biosphere, including a massive increase in crop yield.
The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration database of state-wide extreme weather records, arguably the best of its kind in the world, shows that extreme weather records were mostly set in the 1930s and practically nothing unusual is happening today. Similarly, sea-level rise and ocean pH levels are not a problem and polar bears are thriving
So, what is the basis for fear of a climate emergency? It originates merely in computerized model forecasts of hypothetical future climate states. Yet, over the past 30 years, and despite the expenditure of billions of dollars of government funding, with one exception, not a single climate model prediction of...
(Excerpt) Read more at americaoutloud.com ...
The IPCC fraud wasn’t enough.
Michael Mann’s refusal to submit HIS OWN DATA to support HIS OWN CASE against Dr. Tim Ball (Mann lost), and again against Rand Simberg & Mark Steyn (where Mann also lost) STILL wasn’t enough.
They can’t accept that there’s no real science to back the ‘warming’ claims.
They literally worship Dr. Fraudpants (HT Mark Steyn).
It’s irrational, just like a cult.
But this is basically the same crowd which kept crowing about SCOTUS granting special constitutional rights in a ruling on privacy and failed with multiple supermajorities in Congress to pass a single law on abortion...
...and the manipulation of this crowd is IN THEIR FACE....
yet they can’t accept the truth.
I learned a long time ago in speaking to liberal democrats that the ‘D’ actually stood for Denial.
Michael Savage was right.
No! It IS a cult! Act accordingly!
Climatavism is the step-child of the COVIDians.
Mask up, bunker down, and prepare for the winter of DEATH.
/s
AP announces sweeping climate journalism initiative
Feb. 15, 2022
The Associated Press announced today it will significantly expand its climate coverage, creating a standalone desk that will enhance the global understanding of climate change and its impact across the world.
The initiative will infuse the global media landscape with a new stream of quality climate journalism through both AP content and in-depth training and collaboration directly with AP’s thousands of customers worldwide.
The news agency will also launch an AP StoryShare network for climate coverage, allowing news organizations to share their content with one another and in turn provide more robust coverage for their audiences.
The expansion is supported by several philanthropic organizations, including the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, Quadrivium and The Rockefeller Foundation. AP retains complete editorial control of all content.
“Unbiased, fact-based journalism has never been more important or imperiled,” said Larry Kramer, president of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. “The Associated Press has, for over a century, played a crucial role reporting on the most pressing issues of our time, including climate change. The climate initiative will build on AP’s legacy of independent journalism and help millions better understand the impact of the climate crisis and counter climate-related misinformation.”
https://www.ap.org/press-releases/2022/ap-announces-sweeping-climate-journalism-initiative
My droll humor includes obligatory sarcasm, sometimes without citation.
A good article to print out and distribute-—makes the core argument clear to a layman quickly.
Those “deep pockets”... They are the American Taxpayer’s pockets, and they aren’t really as deep as the propagandists seem to think they are.
One thing with “climate models”.
They all agree, more less, among themselves, but they do not agree with reality.
The only model which seems to fit the reality is the Russian model. Apparently Russians do not subscribe to the climate cult, so they can produce some pretty good model.
Here’s a tale:
Last weekend I attended a Graduation ceremony at the prestigious midwestern University (U of M).
The ceremony was held outside, in the “Big House,” the stadium.
It was bitter cold and windy.
Every speaker mentioned the school’s dedication to “CLIMATE STUDIES.”
Maria Shriver was the keynote. Oh sure, she was gung-ho CLIMATE too.
After the thing was over, I mentioned to my SIL, who is a flaming liberal lawyer, that I thought it was wrong to scare these graduates with obvious nonsense about how CLIMATE CHANGE (nee “global warming”) was going to kill us all.
As liberals always do, she immediately started calling me names (like “closed-minded”). Then she resorted to “ad hominems” against me (as liberals always do)
I said that we were all in the stands freezing our a$$es off.
She continued to argue that “she BELIEVED in Climate Change. She argued that just one cold day doesn’t count (it was April 30) and that I was too ignorant to understand the dire plight we are all in.
I told her that ALL of our climate is ultimately controlled by the SUN (I have a Ph.D. in Astrophysics)
“No matter,” she said - she BELIEVED.
Unfortunately, my wife doesn’t want to see arguments within the family. So I have to keep my mouth shut.
The author is 100% correct - IT IS A CULT!
I told my SIL that in the future, I will try to be less “Closed-minded.”
She is so dumb she believed me.
The solar cycle climate model is 93% accurate at predicting present-day climate based on historical climate data.
No climate “scientist’s” computer model comes close to that degree of accuracy and never will because of the impossibility of knowing and mapping an infinite number of initial conditions at a precise moment in time.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/09/04/chaos-climate-part-3-chaos-models/
The only reason climate “scientists” don’t use the solar cycle climate model is because it doesn’t give them the result they want; global warming (which is code for exterminating 90% of the global population).
It is all about the Sun rays, radio waves, and solar surface activity. When there are heavy concentrations of solar flares on the Sun, we more heat than normal during that timeframe. We also get communicatons outages. Obama destroyed the Ham Radio Federal information on the web pages expunging “solar flares and heat” from the Sun as reasons for communications problems. Now we have communications problems for no reason;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.