Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greene offers bill to abolish Section 230
The Hill ^ | 04/28/22 | Emily Brooks

Posted on 04/28/2022 11:05:13 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Thursday is introducing a bill to abolish Section 230 — the law the protects online platforms from liability — on the heels of Twitter accepting Elon Musk’s offer to buy the company and take it private.

Greene’s bill would eliminate the law making online platforms not liable for content posted by third parties and replace it with a provision to require “reasonable, non-discriminatory access to online communications platforms” through a “common carrier” framework that Greene compared to airlines or package delivery services.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abolish; bigtech; mtg; section230
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
This is the Constitutional way to solve the social media problem, without embracing big government schemes of anti-trust.
1 posted on 04/28/2022 11:05:13 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

This seems common sense and hopefully some other members of Congress and the Senate get a board because I don’t believe she has the credibility to move this. Hopefully with Elon musk buying Twitter, they will finally pass this live nothing else to avoid him censoring Democrats.


2 posted on 04/28/2022 11:09:03 AM PDT by Reno89519 (FJB. Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

I assume there is no current publishing of the actual bill’s wording yet?


3 posted on 04/28/2022 11:10:16 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Tech companies finance the corrupt whose votes she needs 🤪


4 posted on 04/28/2022 11:10:29 AM PDT by NWFree (Somebody has to say i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

“But if I’m the one to do it
They’ll run their quill pens through it
I’m obnoxious and disliked you know that’s so”
1776


5 posted on 04/28/2022 11:14:29 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (Be kind to each other, unless the other guy is a dumbass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

NO!!

its a trap

Sites will then be able to get sued because of the content people post and it would lead to MORE censorship


6 posted on 04/28/2022 11:14:54 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

“unlawful content”

whose laws? each and every censorship law for all 500 “nations” and their one billion internal governing subdivisions?


7 posted on 04/28/2022 11:16:14 AM PDT by catnipman (In a post-covid world, ALL "science" is now political science: stolen elections have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

It’s amazing how the useless Republicans couldn’t find a way to do this.


8 posted on 04/28/2022 11:17:08 AM PDT by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

It’s not a trap. Abolishing section 230 will bring these platforms to heel.

The trap is anti-trust where small government conservatives become cheerleaders for big government anti-capitalist schemes.


9 posted on 04/28/2022 11:17:40 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (A man's rights rest in 3 boxes. The ballot box, jury box and the cartridge box.- Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
Each week Marjorie Taylor Greene does more to advance the cause of freedom of the American People than all of the 150 RINOs who voted for Liz Cheney do in a year.

10 posted on 04/28/2022 11:17:56 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston
#8: "It’s amazing how the useless Republicans couldn’t find a way to do this."

Dittos.

11 posted on 04/28/2022 11:18:52 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
These companies switched from content carriers to content providers when they censored opposing opinions. As such, Section 230 cannot apply to them. Such actions are also illegal political contributions-in-kind and they need to be charged for every penny of them.
12 posted on 04/28/2022 11:20:18 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

“...I don’t believe she has the credibility to move this.”

Really? Please explain.


13 posted on 04/28/2022 11:20:50 AM PDT by Howie66 (Let's Go Brandon!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

It’s not a trap. Abolishing section 230 will bring these platforms to heel.

It is

Tech companies will have to moderate even more because they will fear that they will get sued in any content “incites” people

Small tech start ups would go bankrupt just trying to defend

How many people would have sued Twitter for allowing Trump to “incite” Jan 6th for example?


14 posted on 04/28/2022 11:22:12 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Anti Trust laws have been good for America. But now, they are not being enforced.


15 posted on 04/28/2022 11:23:16 AM PDT by Tea Party Terrorist (Eat the Rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

I am for this and have been for some time, but what is hilarious are the Leftists, who LOVED section 230 while they had control of Twitter, are suddenly (with the blazing speed of American Pacifist Communists in 1941 who changed in seconds from pacifist isolationists to passionate advocates for US entry into the war when Germany invaded Russia!) all for banishing it now that a non-Leftist will control it!

Whiplash!


16 posted on 04/28/2022 11:24:03 AM PDT by rlmorel (Democrats running things is termite infestation, and the exterminator won't be here for 3 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

They just need to declare certain tech software interactions to be publishers rather than platforms, since they are already censoring the content. No need to knock out section 230, just remove the obvious, blatant abuse of its provision.


17 posted on 04/28/2022 11:38:39 AM PDT by Kevmo (Give back Ukes their Nukes https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4044080/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Good idea, but nothing sponsored by Greene is going to become law in that Congress.


18 posted on 04/28/2022 11:50:16 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

How does this play out for Free Republic, and the users here?


19 posted on 04/28/2022 12:20:10 PM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

One potential problem I see with this approach is that there will still be some calls for censorship of some content, but the platforms themselves will not want to be responsible (since that would make them liable). So the natural evolution would probably be to have the government step in and tell the platforms who they can censor and who they can’t. It could result in a “do no post” list, like the “do not fly” list that the government provides to airlines.


20 posted on 04/28/2022 12:22:42 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson