Posted on 04/16/2022 6:27:01 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Pfizer announced this week that they were asking the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization (EUA) for a “booster” COVID-19 vaccine for children between the ages of 5 and 11. (Source.)
The FDA issued an EUA for the first Pfizer COVID-19 shots for this age group of children in October of 2021. (Source.)
At the time, a doctor on the FDA Advisory Committee deliberating on whether or not an EUA should be given for this age group, stated that the only way to find out if the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines were safe for this age group was to start injecting them with it.
“We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes.”
So now that we have almost 6 months of data since the first EUA was issued for this age group to be injected with Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots, just how safe is it?
So far over 10,000 cases have been filed to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) of deaths and injuries among children in this age group following the experimental COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)
By way of contrast, there have been 939 cases of vaccine adverse events during this same time period for all of the FDA approved vaccines for children in this age group. (Source.)
That means there has been an increase of over 1000% of vaccine injuries and deaths for this age group following the COVID-19 vaccines.
I could not find any data on how many children in this age group have been injected with the Pfizer COVID-19 shots, but news reports have stated that it is a small percentage of those eligible.
(Excerpt) Read more at healthimpactnews.com ...
Where has Ed Dowd disappeared to?
This source is suspect, and continues to prove coconut oil and make claims that just are not true. However, it hides behind a false name to generate the veneer of credibility. I urge people to click on the source and read the information under about us.
It is important to understand the sources of many of the claims that are floated as something that is actually accurate.
What sick parent would even allow these dangerous $hots to be given to their children??? 😩
"We have to pass the bill to find out what's in it." -- Nancy Pelosi
“What sick parent would even allow these dangerous $hots to be given to their children??? 😩”
Poster #3 on this thread.
More blood on teachers’ hands.
Portlanders
I agree . . . many probably were coerced into it.
I have never once advocated for the vaccination of children. My record on this is quite consistent. Just out of curiosity — are you intentionally lying and therefore being malicious, or on the other hand, do you just loft statements in the air with no knowledge? Perhaps you should not bear false witness, either intentionally or unintentionally.
I don’t care how suspect a source is. If this quote is accurate, then Houston, we have a problem. No doctor should be able to hang onto his credentials or be in a decision-making role over public health that has such reckless disregard for conducting medical experiments on children. Leave the kids alone, Dr. Mengele. If you want experimental subjects, how about singling out the hoards of people living on the street who have no problem with smoking, snorting and shooting untold poisons into their bodies everyday. Funny how damn few of that population has succumbed to COVID. Anyone even curious about why that is?
You do not care how suspect a source is? So it’s ok to not evaluate the actual source as part of the overall evaluation of a hypothesis? Not withstanding this rather disturbing statement — I agree with you that Fauci should be banished to the dustbin of irrelevant idiots who demonstrate a fundamental lack of understanding of basic science.
American public are the test modules for the Pfizer vaccines thanks to Dr. Fauci.
Unfortunately the only credible source is one that agrees with their Personal narrative. This site was once a place to debate facts, to provide evidence of claims. Now any blog or YouTube video, regardless of how suspect reins supreme. I have never seen more confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance masking as fact in my 60 plus years.
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled 1000% Increase in Vaccine Deaths and Injuries Following Pfizer COVID-19 EUA Vaccine for 5 to 11 Year Olds, gas_dr wrote: This source is suspect, and continues to prove coconut oil and make claims that just are not true. However, it hides behind a false name to generate the veneer of credibility. I urge people to click on the source and read the information under about us.
It is important to understand the sources of many of the claims that are floated as something that is actually accurate.
*
Classic distraction deployed by FR's own fake doctor. Someone posts VAERS data and you can't refute it so you attack the messenger. But that's what you do - attack and distract.
So you find the source credible? It is not distraction, it is analysis. Something that seems to escape many people. It is not unreasonable to point to the sources and see what they actually are. However, I note that I simply questioned the source while you are the one who has made a visceral attack. Perhaps there is some insight that can be generated from that. I attacked no one, I simply questioned the source. Something that I believe you have advocated in the past.
Thank you for your commentary and response. With all due respect, I disagree with you.
LOL...are you saying THAT is the type parent who would administer these horrid $hots, to their own kids, if they had any?
Your analysis is quite correct. I think this is something that is lost here as well, analysis of what is and is not has been grossly usurped by — as you say — confirmation bias. Unfortunately in this day and age, anyone can stand on a platform and shout they are promulgating facts. But when you actually question the source, they raise their voice instead of reinforcing their argument.
Many, many have tried but this one is a real contender to be tops.
I think the children angle adds bonus disinformation points.
Be careful — you have touched the holy grail of VAERS. Never mind that VAERS itself states that it is not to be used to formulate decisions as it is a self reported and unverified data base — but many will breathlessly report and extrapolate that somehow this data base accounts for a tiny minority of what is occurring. It is easy to ignore that which pierces ones own theories, and instead attack people.
Your point is not only elegant, but concise. You are absolutely correct in your statement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.