Posted on 04/13/2022 9:52:34 AM PDT by Red Badger
Just what Pootie’s stretched-thin military needs: another front.
Ivan better stick to one invasion at a time.
If they’re sending anti-ship systems, they’re either planning naval operations or are running out of short range ballistic missiles.
Once again, Russia proves why NATO is needed in the first place.
Trump may have bashed NATO, but it was because NATO wasn’t keeping their commitments for defense spending and relying too much on the US.
NATO has now finally woken up to the fact that Trump’s demands were very wise.
We wouldn't tolerate Mexico being heavily-armed and aligned with either Russia or China.
Maybe the Ruskies are going to build a “peace bridge “.
Does the war end when they reach the Finnish line?
poking the bear, see what it gets you.
Seems to me NATO is the problem.
Why does Russia tolerate a heavily-armed U.S. in NATO?
The U.S. does, after all, have territorial waters bordering Russia. And why should it?
By your twisted logic, Russia should not tolerate the presence of such a heavily-armed neighboring country.
Regards,
Many nations, including putin and biden, have nukes that aren’t getting any younger ? You put biden in office lamestream media; enjoy any mushrooms
Uh oh..you are correct and the Putinistas won’t be happy.
You may get your deepest wish fulfilled: a Russian - NATO war. You want that very badly, don’t you? You can’t stand anyone opposing Russian bullying; you think Russia — historically a bully — should be able to wield its chest-thumping without consequence, and that all “lesser” people should just meekly comply.
NATO has only woken up to the fact that it can destroy the US.
Trump probably would have restructured the whole mess that is NATO if they hadn’t held the Steele Dossier over his neck.
Brussels is the problem, not the solution.
“There is no chance Russia is going to tolerate a heavily-armed Finland in NATO. Nor should it.”
Russia and Putin are just going to have to suck eggs on this one. First, Russia is in no position to go to war against a better trained, better equipped, and far more motivated Finland. Second, there is no second. Russia cannot take on Finland.
“We wouldn’t tolerate Mexico being heavily-armed and aligned with either Russia or China.”
We’re not doing anything that would cause Mexico to seek protection from us so this comparison is not even remotely valid.
They should be overjoyed at the idea of russia invading Finland. It’s only a small issue of sovereignty right?
Like I said, this isn't just about Ukraine.
Did not the fins beat their ass once before. He is moving his artillery in the exact wrong direction.
When the women then arm themselves with bear spray, the neighborhood tough intones ominously: "That isn't going to improve the situation! In fact, that will lessen your security now!"
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.