This will be interesting
The silver lining is that if Biden wins this suit then all sanctuary laws will also be invalid.
so, we have our inalienable right to own firearms/protection, and our constitutions which is supposed to back up that right, is under such attack by the left that a state finds it necessary to pass another law which ‘protects the constitution’s 2nd amendment protection” and now the biden admin wants to fight it claiming that it’s unconstitutional?
Do you need reminded that none of them are “absolute” per branDUHn? Wonder what reaction we’d see if someone decided to repeal the 13th and 19th amendments. After all, according to branDUHn they ain’t “absolute”. Just sayin’.............. :>}
Commie phucks!
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
If I recall this legislation correctly, the Missouri law forbids state employees from aiding the federal government enforcing federal diktats. It imposes fines and jail time on state employees aiding the feds.
This is entirely within the state’s sovereign power to do so. The USSC in Prinz v US settled this question, when Clinton tried to draft state employees to carry our 2nd amendment enforcements. The court said states are sovereigns and can’t be forcibly drafted to aid the feds in their actions.
What’s really happening here is that the federal government cannot enforce its diktats without the assent and cooperation of the states. The feds simply don’t have the manpower or logistical means to police the states without the state’s cooperation.
Missouri’s law completely cripples the fascist federal bureaucracy trying to attack individuals or groups within a state. The Missouri law is a good law, and more states need to follow Missouri’s example.
Add in elected pro-2nd amendment, constitutional sheriffs, and the feds are in deep trouble trying to enforce its fascist diktats.
BTW, courts have consistently ruled that counties and Indian reservations are also sovereigns.
The gist is that California has seceded by disavowing federal law rather than make an effort to evade it
It is 100% constitutional for
states to refuse to provide State resources to the Feds for use in enforcing Federal law. The States can’t try to prevent the Feds from doing their jobs. Then can’t keep them out of the state, but the don’t have to help. That point has been upheld by SCOTUS 4 or 5 times.
bkmk
The FedGov will Judge-shop until they find the appropriate leftist/communist/socialist/Marxist/liberal/anarchist in a black robe, and try the case with him/her. MO will be overturned if they get their hand-picked Judge.
The FedGov leviathan has taken the bait. Lord, help us take him with a fishhook, as you told Job. “Shall not be infringed,” or not?
can it be said that the biden administration is in conflict with what the constitution states, shall not be infringed.
perhaps they are rebelling against the constitution, and should be ineligible to hold any office.
I hope Missouri can stretch the case out beyond Bidet’s term.