We need to contact the Congress critters about this woman. Let’s remind them that it’s an election year and we will remember how they vote.
When it comes to Democrat Presidential nominees to the SC, why go through the kabuki theatre of Senate hearing? Just nominate a robot. The Dem appointees are a very cohesive political bunch that have never in the past 60 years gone astray and ruled against marquee Democrat legislative or policy issues. You will never find a Souter, Warren, Stevens, Kennedy, Roberts or O’Connor and a host of other Republican justices that went liberal or maintained a moderate strain among them. Law has little to do with Dem appointed SC justices. Just program the robot to follow Kagan or Sotomayer’s lead. And you don’t even have to pay it. Paint it black or brown if you want to play the diversity game.
ALL the Pstupid and evil Democrats WILL vote for her!
Anyone who can’t define a basic fact of life is not qualified to be a judge of our laws.
This indicates that she does not respect the truth, but is willing to follow the crowd and the ways of the liberal progressive world.
Wake Up America! They are trying to destroy reason and logic.
Not to worry, plenty of republicans will vote to confirm her,
I think the biological definition is “adult human organism, whose biology is built for producing large gametes”.
It might not be the best definition, but that’s what I can do without looking it up.
Where I am unsure is that I remember from school that girls are born already having all their egg-cells, but men constantly produce new sperm so even if they ruin their sperm by drinking then it takes 4 months of sobriety to have new sperm never touched by alcohol.
She just proved that science determines gender.
After reading through the transcript of the oral arguments in the OSHA vaccine mandate case a few months ago, I determined that U.S. Supreme Court justices are some of the dumbest, most uninformed people on the planet.
This Kenny Michael Jackson nitwit might actually make the place smarter.
IIRC, she has said that woman should have the right to abort their babies. But she doesn’t know what women are.
Guys. She’s getting in.
Betcha she doesn’t know what “fungible” means.
She opened up a can of worms that Democrats will have to suffer through. Twitter is all over it.
Kudos to Sen. Marsha Blackburn for asking the question. Someone must have made a deep dive into Jackson’s background to be able to smoke her out with such a simple question.
Jackson has lived a charmed life, and still hates the country that afforded it to her. She is beyond reason.
Her confirmation was a done deal once Biden nominated her.
Regardless of what happens with this Durbin kangaroo court there should be a warranty (trial) period for all DC positions, especially SCOTUS. It is simply not right for lifelong appointment of a person with unknown qualities to a position of such power. Maybe what needs to be done is the final advice and consent should be given 6 months to a year after they sit on the court. Without that approval they should be removed and replaced. Just wondering?
She’s obviously going to be certified. Just as obammy and gore won the nobel peace prize, this unqualified individual will soon be on the supreme court.
A good follow-up question would be "Does that mean you believe that the differences between the sexes are biological, and they are not just social constructs?"
This woman is a radical black “woman” with an agenda and attitude. I want to know, did race have anything to do with the extraordinary light sentence (three months) she gave to the black child porn perp?
If there is no definition of a woman than why do can’t you replace Ginsberg with a man?
If she can’t answer that how, can she decide the real complex cases that come before the SCOTUS?