Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Disqualifying': Judge Jackson Slammed for Refusal to Define What a Woman Is
Townhall.com ^ | March 23, 2022 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 03/23/2022 6:28:17 AM PDT by Michael.SF.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: maddog55

“The basic comeback question should have been:
What are you a man or a woman?”

Nah - I would have just dug up some government form (Application, CVs, noted awards from womens group, etc) from the paper trail that she’s filled out designating herself as a woman and ask why/how she choose that designation - or did she lie about being a woman? Guess at it?


41 posted on 03/23/2022 7:09:17 AM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
"What are you a man or a woman?"

"I'm a woman".

"How do you know? You're not a biologist".


42 posted on 03/23/2022 7:09:21 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Ain’t Affirmative Action wonderful.


43 posted on 03/23/2022 7:10:04 AM PDT by bray (The Vax is fake and deadly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

The judge doesn’t know what she is?


44 posted on 03/23/2022 7:10:29 AM PDT by Chgogal (Whatever Biden decides to do, do the opposite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

So why do we care that she is a woman if there is no definition of the term?


45 posted on 03/23/2022 7:12:05 AM PDT by bray (The Vax is fake and deadly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Ah, thought the further complication was deeper in your parenthesis. But even 1a is seen in a different light when you consider their 1b for “female”:

- having a gender identity that is the opposite of male


46 posted on 03/23/2022 7:15:34 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

“Once she catches that, I imagine she’ll want to correct the record.”

If some senator had/has their thinking cap on (and the walnuts to do it) they would ask a quick follow up question on why she specified biologist instead of, say, a psychiatrist or sociologist?


47 posted on 03/23/2022 7:18:37 AM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

If you can’t define what a woman is, then how could she apply laws that include sex based-requirements, such as Title IX? Or frankly, any employment-based law that requires that a decision be made as to whether someone is male or female?


48 posted on 03/23/2022 7:19:21 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

“what’s her LSAT score” ??????????

HAHAHA!


49 posted on 03/23/2022 7:19:43 AM PDT by bitt ( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble
Who was it in the White House who thought a child-porn defending judge was a good choice?

Perhaps someone known to sniff and grope little girls in public?

50 posted on 03/23/2022 7:24:31 AM PDT by null and void (We may not understand the nature of the lie, yet. But we can be certain they are lying to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

She said she is not a biologist, which is an admission that the definition of a woman is biological. What is female was settled science before we even had biological science. Cows produce calves after they have mated with bulls. Even Neanderthals apparently got this one down pat.


51 posted on 03/23/2022 7:26:06 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

THAT can get really messy.........


52 posted on 03/23/2022 7:28:08 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.; All
Saw this quote in regard to the Clarence Thomas nomination:

"But simply because he's black doesn't make him right or make him good for the United States Supreme Court." -- Rep. John Lewis

53 posted on 03/23/2022 7:29:22 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Never do anything illegal, when you are doing something illegal. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

It is as basic as A, B, C, D, E, F, G..... XX XO x Y Z.


54 posted on 03/23/2022 7:33:32 AM PDT by Jumper ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouieFisk
To those who claim they can’t define the word “woman” there are two questions that should burn out whatever logic circuits they may have left: 1 - If there is no definition of “woman”, how do you know when a male to female “transition” has been accomplished? 2 - If you can’t define women, how can you make the claim “’ trans’ women are real women”?

Their response would probably be: "If a person FEE-EELS that they are a woman, then they are a woman." 'Cuz there is no subjective truth, dontcha know?

Regards,

55 posted on 03/23/2022 7:39:21 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

The perfect counter question.

Judge Jackson, “if you cannot define a woman, or tell us the the difference between a man and a woman, consider that we already have a black man Clearance Justice sitting on the court, and precisely because blacks are no more than 15% of the US population, we should pass you over because your only defining qualification was that you are a woman of black color as defined by the President. Do you think the SCOTUS might be better served with someone of different race, such as the heritage of India like our vice president rather than over representation by blacks?”


56 posted on 03/23/2022 7:39:38 AM PDT by Jumper ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
there is no subjective objective truth

Sorry - too hurried.

Regards,

57 posted on 03/23/2022 7:40:31 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
So the most brilliant legal mind of the nation is unable to ask a very basic question. Some excellent comments contained in tweets from Ben Shapiro and Piers Morgan

Does she sit or stand? For dog lovers, Pointer or Setter?

58 posted on 03/23/2022 7:40:56 AM PDT by Don Corleone (leave the gun, take the canolis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.; All

😂👍


59 posted on 03/23/2022 7:43:33 AM PDT by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toespi
she admitted that gender is determined by biology/science.

You've fallen into the liberal trap of adopting their terms. It's your sex that is determined by biology, male or female; gender is a term to describe parts of a language.

60 posted on 03/23/2022 7:44:38 AM PDT by libertylover (Our BIGGEST problem, by far, is that most of the media is hate & agenda driven, not truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson