Posted on 03/21/2022 11:09:56 AM PDT by Red Badger
Both political parties are salivating to draw our military into the Russia-Ukraine war, but neither of them seems to care about what our own leaders have done to these soldiers.
It is now abundantly clear from numerous data points that the shots have caused unimaginable injury among the general population. Military doctors have come forward to show the enormity of this damage in the military, yet the military has chosen to cover it up and tamper with their own health surveillance data in order to conceal the magnitude of the injury. Meanwhile, new data presented in a Florida federal court on behalf of a Navy SEAL demonstrates that, at a minimum, more people died from the shot than from COVID.
On March 10, attorney Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel presented data in court showing 127 VAERS-reported COVID vaccine-related deaths in the military in 2021. That is more than the 93 reported COVID deaths in the military since the beginning of the pandemic. And keep in mind, COVID deaths tend to be overestimated, while VAERS-reported deaths, especially in the military, are underreported. Even CDC researchers recently conceded that “the actual rates of myocarditis per million doses of vaccine are likely higher than estimated” by VAERS reports.
The military VAERS data was initially discovered by Dr. Jessica Rose, a biologist and mathematician who has likely published more information on VAERS than anyone in the world. VAERS has a box to check for those in the military to select upon submission, and she counted 127 reported deaths stemming from service members in 2021.
This safety signal from the universal reporting system is the most significant evidence to date that the DMED (Defense Medical Epidemiology Data) specifically monitoring the military, as originally presented by the whistleblowers, was correct when it showed a massive surge in injuries ranging from neurological and cardio to cancers and immune disorders. According to the military, though, the 2016-2020 baseline used by the whistleblowers was plagued by a glitch just at the time these military doctors pulled the information (not before and not after!) and the numbers for those years were always as high as those in 2021. The problem is that the VAERS data, by definition, indicate that 2021 had to have experienced a surge in injuries. It’s just a question of how much. Here is the VAERS data for vaccine-related hospitalizations in 2021 compared to previous years.
Again, with VAERS being woefully underreported, especially in the military with so much pressure against speaking ill of the injections, it makes sense that the diagnosis codes in DMED would be exponentially higher. Given the unprecedented vaccine injuries that we already have seen in the civilian world, and as indicated by the VAERS death and hospitalization data, it would make sense that there was a 37% increase in military hospitalizations in 2021 over the five-year average, as presented by the whistleblowers in the court case.
Here is the data from the whistleblowers as presented by attorney Tom Renz to Senator Ron Johnson showing a 37% increase with two months of 2021 still not reported. If the numbers for November and December followed the same trajectory, it would show a 55% increase in military hospitalizations for 2021 over the five-year average.
Now, here is the data the DOD is showing after fixing the alleged “glitch,” which now reveals no baseline increase whatsoever.
If you extrapolate the numbers for a full 12-month period, it would show a 2% decrease in hospitalizations over the five-year average. So the military would have us believe that not only did the baseline degree of vaccine injury we already know occurred in the civilian world not exist in the military, but they are essentially saying that COVID itself never made an appearance! Here we have the military expelling soldiers for not getting a shot for a virus they claim, based on their “new” data, never touched the health of the service members.
Until the Florida court hearing, Pentagon officials have not publicly issued a statement of narrative on how they claim their data glitched and why only for certain convenient categories and only for a period of time. They merely offered a few on-the-record sentences to PolitiFact. Thanks to Judge Douglas Merryday’s injunction on the vaccine mandate in Navy SEAL 1 vs. Austin, we will finally obtain discovery of the facts. However, the DOD is still dragging its feet. Officials failed to send a single doctor or representative from the military to testify in court.
Meanwhile, the plaintiffs called three military flight surgeons, Lt. Col. Peter Chambers, Lt. Col. Teresa Long, and Col. (Ret.) Stewart Tankersley, to the stand to discuss their experience treating mass vaccine injury in the military. When Liberty Counsel’s Mat Staver asked Lt. Col. Long a question about the DMED, she said, “I have been ordered not to answer that question.” Judge Merryday immediately asked, “Ordered by who?” She then testified that the night before, she was told by her commanders not to testify, which is likely a violation of the Whistleblower Act and constitutes tampering with the witness. Here is the report of the hearing from Liberty Counsel:
Staver then asked Dr. Long if the information the military ordered her not to testify to was relevant and important to the court and the public. She said, “Yes.” Staver then asked, “Why?”
Dr. Long paused, held back tears, looked at the judge and said, “I have so many soldiers being destroyed by this vaccine. Not a single member of my senior command has discussed my concerns with me. ... I have nothing to gain and everything to lose by talking about it. I’m OK with that because I am watching people get absolutely destroyed.”
Dr. Long said she is inundated morning, noon and night regarding people who have been injured by taking the COVID shots. Those injured are “predominantly pilots, and pilots have to meet one of the highest fitness standards.”
She also said she is aware of at least two people who committed suicide under pressure to get the shots and threat of punishment for refusal.
Dr. Long also testified that based on the VAERS database, deaths of military members from the vaccines exceed deaths from COVID itself. The military’s only response was to send a Word document to their lawyer (with no letterhead or signature) explaining the “glitch” in the data. However, the statement of narrative raises more questions than it answers. Officials claim that “not all DMED queries were affected by the corrupt data.” Also, the corruption was only from August 2021 to January 29, 2022. Those were the dates that they knew the flight surgeons were pulling the data. Plus, it was only for 2016-2020, an arbitrary baseline pulled by the whistleblowers. In other words, the glitch was only for the categories and for the time period that they needed it to be glitched – nothing more, nothing less!
How much longer will Congress ignore the Watergate of the military?
ping!................
How much longer will Congress ignore the Watergate of the military?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As long as the Kenyanesian Usurper tells them to.
I don’t know where Horowitz is getting his information, but I just searched the VAERS data-base for reactions to military jabs in 2021, and there were only 1 reported hospitalizations.
They did it first with the Anthrax vaccine.
bkmk
DIDN’T THAT GET PULLED QUICKLY?............
Not quick enough for a lot of us.
These findings coincide with what Ed Dowd has found with insurance companies and funeral homes data.
It was NEVER about Covid and ALWAYS about the vaccine.
Why didn’t they just try to claim the entire increase was due to Covid infections instead of playing the game they played?
If you look at the graphs they are DMED graphs dated 01/2022
What dates are you seeing?
If you read the court testimony it is compelling.
This is DoD data. So it looks like to me that the DoD is not sending their reports to VERS. Which means this data isn't counted in the VAERS totals.
Don’t spoil the fear porn. Journalists are experts, doncha know. Unfair to challenge their reasoning.
Next you’ll be pointing out that VAERS is unverified self-reporting rather than hard data. You’ll probably even have the gall to post this qualification from the VAERS site itself:
“VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused a health problem, but is especially useful for detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse event reporting that might indicate a possible safety problem with a vaccine.”
https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.