Posted on 03/08/2022 6:33:18 AM PST by Red Badger
Worth a repost!!
Its ALWAYS “THE MONEY”!
Years ago before covid, RFK Jr asked his friend Roger Ailes to get him on one of his Fox shows. Ailes told him that if that happened, he would get a call from Rupert and, not sure if I remember this correctly, would be fired. Pharma is the major advertiser. Don’t bite the hand...
And I knew Chris Ruddy was a duplicitous phony through people who were prospective business prospects for him years ago, too.
Very interesting. Thanks for posting.
.
FOX is always there to push Gov Hoaxes.
And collect money for it.
.
bttt
FOX was one of the biggest fake vax pushers out there. I wonder how much Biden pays them for war propaganda?
They are so obvious when they have an agenda they are pushing.
Fox and Newsmax are not your friends. Go to One America News because OAN is what both of them make believe they are and never have been.
Heartwarming to find people not yet jaded by the cynicism of bitter experience. Such sweet innocence would almost restore your faith in human nature...if you didn't know better. Of course, no one needs to tell you such idealists will simply be squashed like cockroaches and nobody will do squat about it.
If the political prisoners of Jan. 6 haven't proved this to you, nothing will.
I figured something like that happened when Newsmaxx started slapping a vaccine ad in front of every streaming program....
How much did Hannity get paid?
So Fox ran paid advertising from the gov. I don’t see the big deal here. They *could’ve* taken moral exception to it and not ran the advertising I guess.
If it was payments to Fox News (without advertising contract) or Fox employees directly, I think that would be a problem but that’s not what happened here according to the article.
It is a big deal because they didn't just run ads, they ran propaganda OUTSIDE OF AD TIME, pretending it was "news" while they intentionally misdirected and squelched actual news items that conflicted with what they were paid 30 pieces of government silver for.
All the additional propaganda is an illegal political contribution-in-kind.
They outright lied to their viewers about dangerous health experiments. While the pharmaceutical korporations may cling to immunity (despite evidence of fraud), the media outlets can't are liable for spreading misinformation that led to adverse reactions and deaths from the Jim Jones Jabs. The media outlets can't claim it was a government ad - no, the talking heads spewed the lies outside of the government advertisements.
The family of any deceased and anyone suffering from the clot shots can sue the media outlets, even if the pharmaceutical korporations and the government claim immunity.
This is criminal.
So Fox ran paid advertising from the gov. I don’t see the big deal here.
It is a big deal because they didn’t just run ads, they ran propaganda OUTSIDE OF AD TIME, pretending it was “news” while they intentionally misdirected and squelched actual news items that conflicted with what they were paid 30 pieces of government silver for.
All the additional propaganda is an illegal political contribution-in-kind.
They outright lied to their viewers about dangerous health experiments. While the pharmaceutical korporations may cling to immunity (despite evidence of fraud), the media outlets can’t are liable for spreading misinformation that led to adverse reactions and deaths from the Jim Jones Jabs. The media outlets can’t claim it was a government ad - no, the talking heads spewed the lies outside of the government advertisements.
The family of any deceased and anyone suffering from the clot shots can sue the media outlets, even if the pharmaceutical korporations and the government claim immunity.
That makes sense; I see the issue with it. Thanks for clarifying.
Comrades nod
Ditto. I stopped watching when that started.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.