Dunno. I just googled 'ugly democrats' image search.
Posted on 03/02/2022 9:34:57 PM PST by doug from upland
Hillary Clinton. Barbara Mikulski. Dianne Feinstein. Nancy Pelosi. Samantha Power. Janet Reno. Donna Shalala**. Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Barbara Boxer. What do all of these women have in common? They are Democrats. And they are butt ugly. Mere statistics alone would suggest if you got a dozen or so Democrat women politicians together there would be some glimmer of attractiveness, no matter how dim, somewhere. But you would be wrong. However, now, thanks to SCIENCE, we know why: Research has found that being attractive influences many things in a person’s life — their salary, their popularity and grades in school, even the prison sentences they receive. So why not their politics?
A recently published study in the Journal of Public Economics concludes that the attractiveness of a candidate does correlate with their politics. They find that politicians on the right are more good looking in Europe, the United States and Australia.
The study shows correlation, not causation, but the researchers float a simple economic explanation for why this might happen. Numerous studies have shown that good-looking people are likely to earn more, and that people who earn more are typically more opposed to redistributive policies, like the progressive taxes and welfare programs favored by the left.
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
I recognize Waters (middle of three), and recall seeing the redhead (CT isn’t she?) but who is the one on the right?
Rashida Tlaib: now that’s being unkind to “butts.”
Yep.
Dunno. I just googled 'ugly democrats' image search.
Rush Limbaugh covered this DECADES ago, folks..
Exactly! So???
Yup. Both genders. Inversely proportional.
I didn’t laugh about it then, but laugh about it now:
Age, well water & liberalism has caused he & his wife to not age well, and I’m not talking gray hair & wrinkles.
“Nancy Patricia D’Alesandro was a very pretty young lady in her early twenties, IMHO.”
How do you know that? They didn’t have photography back then, did they?
With lots of surgical work and makeup
I think it could be that they come under criticism for making themselves look better. It’s like they are submitting to the patriarchy. The Hollywood types have to do it to keep their jobs, so that is OK.
And Madeline Albright was Walter Mondale in drag.
“Uggo Americans,” as Rush used to call them.
At least a three, maybe four. 😆
Being angry, resentful, bitter and even physically violent releases high levels of cortisone’s, adrenaline and testosterone into the body and over periods of time being always angry, bitter and bitchy all the time, not necessarily physically violent, keeps on adding all
those hormones into the body and it will age a person.
What takes a toll on the mind and body will be reflected in the face.
That was the conclusion of Eric Hoffer in his seminal work “The Ordeal of Change”. Though he traced that resentment (particularly the resentment of the “thinkers” towards the “doers” that get the rewards in practice) all the way back to the ancient and pre-Biblical civilizations.
“...part bitterness at being ugly, so anger and hate and getting even is their main pleasure.”
You’re onto something. Attractive people draw more attention all their lives. Uggo Americans see it and resent it. So they complain, about everything else. Can’t bitch about their ugliness.
What party is the Party of Complainers?
(And misfits, oddballs, kooks...)
Rosa DeLauro is a much funnier level of ugly, like you're not even sure she can be real. She's muppet-ugly, or maybe what's possible if Keith Richards and Jimmy Durante had a baby.
Yeah—it is about time our side started making stuff up with wacky “science”—everybody is doing it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.