From the same pricks who called trump worse for four years geez gotta love commie hypocrisy
We’re supposed to all rally around Commander in Chief Dementia Joe... like they all rallied around Trump. Shove it, Gloria.
Look for them to try to pass a Sedition Act, banning all criticism of the government during “Wartime”.
I didn’t know this antiquated old scold was even alive still.
Putin is no dummy. Gloria, I am not sure about you.
How about not our monkeys not our circus.
Of course there’s no way the Russkies would know the Cadaver is weak unless told it by the likes of U.S. conservatives.
Orange Man Bad.
This is the narrative on other sites. If you are wary of a war with Russia, it means you are a defender of Putin and a hater of the United States. Sorry, anyone that thinks a war between the US and Russia is a good thing is out of their mind.
Soon it’ll be treason to disparage JB.
Biden has proven himself consistently wrong on foreign affairs for 5 decades now… he already effed up Afghanistan, we are supposed to support him effing up Europe now?
Get bent
He doesn’t appear weak, he IS weak, in every meaning of the word.
Physically, mentally and morally.
Full Goebbels on.
Yeah, the last thing we have to guard against is letting the cat outta the bag on the non-cognizant corpusal in the WH.
Sedition Act passed during World War I
President Woodrow Wilson, in conjunction with congressional leaders and the influential newspapers of the era, urged passage of the Sedition Act in the midst of U.S. involvement in World War I. Wilson was concerned about the country’s diminishing morale and looking for a way to clamp down on growing and widespread disapproval of the war and the military draft that had been instituted to fight it.
Targets of Act were typically individuals who opposed the war effort
The provisions of the act prohibited certain types of speech as it related to the war or the military. Under the act, it was illegal to incite disloyalty within the military; use in speech or written form any language that was disloyal to the government, the Constitution, the military, or the flag; advocate strikes on labor production; promote principles that were in violation of the act; or support countries at war with the United States.
The targets of prosecution under the Sedition Act were typically individuals who opposed the war effort, including pacifists, anarchists, and socialists. Violations of the Sedition Act could lead to as much as twenty years in prison and a fine of $10,000. More than two thousand cases were filed by the government under the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918, and of these more than one thousand ended in convictions.
Court upheld Sedition Act convictions against First Amendment challenges
The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of many of the individuals prosecuted. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. established the “clear and present danger” test in Schenck v. United States (1919). In upholding Socialist Charles Schenck’s conviction, Justice Holmes wrote that “the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.” The Court also unanimously upheld convictions in Debs v. United States (1919) and Frohwerk v. United States (1919).
In Abrams v. United States (1919), the Court reviewed the conviction under the act of Jacob Abrams, who, along with four other Russian defendants, was prosecuted for printing and distributing leaflets calling for workers to strike in an effort to end military involvement in the Soviet Union. The Court in late 1919 upheld the conviction.
However, in this instance Holmes, along with Justice Louis D. Brandeis, dissented from the majority, arguing that the “clear and present danger” test was not met under the circumstances arising in the case. Specifically, Holmes felt that Abrams had not possessed the necessary intent to harm the U.S. war effort. In contrast to his majority opinion in Schenck, Holmes’s dissenting opinion in Abrams urged that political speech be protected under the First Amendment.
The Sedition Act of 1918 was repealed in 1920, although many parts of the original Espionage Act remained in force.
For my part, I’d rather help Putin than biden.
At least Putin is doing more things right than biden, et al are.
Ooooo, sounds impressive. But it’s CNN. Wah Wah Wah.
The whole world can see that Biden is weak without any help from any republican.
To the North, we have a nation turning to totalitarianism.
To the South, we have narco nation where heads are chopped off.
To the East, we have Russia rattling acres.
To the West, we have China screwing with everyone.
In Washington, D.C., the criminal Democrats are only concerned with putting our money in their pockets.
Brandon is weak
It is not as if we are texting Putin telling him Biden is smushy in the head, Putin has known that for a year just from observations