Posted on 02/22/2022 8:55:10 AM PST by rktman
Two weeks ago the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published data about the effectiveness of boosters against COVID-19
The CDC failed to publish a tranche of their data, however - omitting the impact on those aged 18-49, who are least likely to benefit from boosters
The CDC are also being criticized for failing to publish their information about child hospitalization rates and comorbidities
A spokeswoman for the CDC said they were concerned that the data would be misinterpreted, pointing out that it was incomplete and not verified
Critics said that it was always better to publish the information rather than withhold, and allow scientists to analyze and explain what they could
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
“A spokeswoman for the CDC said they were concerned that the data would be misinterpreted, pointing out that it was incomplete and not verified “
You don’t hide data that supports your finding, even if it is “incomplete and not verified”, so we can assume the hidden data does NOT support their findings.
Previously they claimed they hid the data to prevent vaccine hesitancy.
Gee, ya think so???
These people are either really evil or really stupid. Actually it may be more like evil people hire stupid spokesmen.
Continuing proof, as if it were needed, that CoupFlu has NEVER been about public health.
On the nosey!
you can’t see it, for the same reason you aren’t allowed to see the IPPC Hockey-stick data...
We weren’t “hesitant” ever. That would intimate that at one point it was being considered. We never considered it.
🔬😨😷💉🐂💨💩💸
From the CDC “Book of Truth”:
All data considered harmful to us will be labeled “Incomplete and Not Verified”.
This is known as ‘Following the Science’.
Really? Would you allow these clowns to design your airliner? Or actually try to fly it?
PING
So much for informed consent...
Exactly
The blood be on their heads..........................
“Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.”..........Attrib: Heinlein’s Razor............
BUT, But, but...China was not sharing and being opaque in hiding data! Maybe disdain of function is contagious!
they’re so safe and effective that we don’t want to shock you when you learn how safe and effective they are.
**NEWS FLASH**
If you have to get a booster of the exact same shot, then that means the first two failed.
What about the 2nd booster? LOL! Haven’t needed any of them. Sometimes I’m amazed at how many folks buy snake oil. Willingly, and go back for more.
“No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot(s).” Mark Twain
Well according to the Moderna and Pfizer it requires 2 initially.
As for the Johnson & Johnson you are correct the 2nd and 3rd shot of the exact same shot is an indication the shots are failures.
And none have affected us directly at our house. We remain “NON GMO”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.