Sussmann’s lawyers decry Durham’s “conspiracy” theory but also state that Sussmann had no reason to believe that the data he provided to the FBI to substantiate claims of Russian collusion had been manipulated or were “untrue or misleading.”
The lawyers claim that Durham’s filing will taint the jury pool and asked the court to strike, or delete, the “factual background” portion.
Sussmann is charged with lying to the FBI when he allegedly concealed that he was representing the Clinton campaign. He has pleaded not guilty.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: MarvinStinson
I tend to think that Durham is a ducks-in-a-row kind of guy - he wouldn’t say or write anything that wasn’t 100% accurate.
2 posted on
02/15/2022 9:19:41 AM PST by
Psalm 73
("You'll never hear surf music again" - J. Hendrix)
To: MarvinStinson
He, and others, are going to prison!
3 posted on
02/15/2022 9:19:52 AM PST by
Taxman
(SAVE AMERICA!)
To: MarvinStinson
Sussmann’s lawyers decry Durham’s “conspiracy” theory but also state that Sussmann had no reason to believe that the data he provided to the FBI to substantiate claims of Russian collusion had been manipulated or were “untrue or misleading.” Well then, let's find out the real story during discovery. He must have gotten the story from someone else, who was that person and what was Sussmann told about the story by that person?
4 posted on
02/15/2022 9:20:19 AM PST by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: MarvinStinson
7 posted on
02/15/2022 9:22:54 AM PST by
Reno89519
(FJB. Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
To: MarvinStinson
I have information (from somewhere?) that the Durham grand jury has 'interviewed' twenty five people.
Has anyone else heard that and know any thing about it?
Any rumors about what they're finding? Sentiment?
8 posted on
02/15/2022 9:23:05 AM PST by
blam
To: MarvinStinson
Lawyers for former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann are furious Ah, the squealing of cornered rats. It is delicious, like the growing light of dawn upon the American horizon.
10 posted on
02/15/2022 9:24:02 AM PST by
Sirius Lee
(They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
To: MarvinStinson
Maybe these scumbag lawyers just need thier very own Criminal Indictment
11 posted on
02/15/2022 9:24:58 AM PST by
eyeamok
(founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
To: MarvinStinson
(Tech Executive-1’s employer, Internet Company-1, had come to access and maintain dedicated servers for the EOP as part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP. Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.) Is this not, by itself, a crime?
12 posted on
02/15/2022 9:25:45 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: MarvinStinson
Too effing bad, Mr. Attorney.
To: MarvinStinson
They’ll really be upset at the hanging.
14 posted on
02/15/2022 9:26:48 AM PST by
G Larry
(Tolerance will rise until intelligent people are banned from thinking to avoid offending imbeciles)
To: MarvinStinson
Three words will usually shut a defense lawyers right up:
WE HAVE WITNESSES...............................
16 posted on
02/15/2022 9:28:32 AM PST by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: MarvinStinson
Translated “Clintons are furious”
To: MarvinStinson
I hope Durham has some good body guards.
26 posted on
02/15/2022 9:35:37 AM PST by
aimhigh
(THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
To: MarvinStinson
Furious he got caught red handed.
29 posted on
02/15/2022 9:37:59 AM PST by
tennmountainman
( Less Lindell CONS, More AZ Style Audits)
To: MarvinStinson
No just illegally obtained:-)
32 posted on
02/15/2022 9:40:04 AM PST by
Harpotoo
(Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
To: MarvinStinson
Obviously Sussman is on credit with his lawyers and the Clinton effect could punch his ticket at any time. I suggest they insist on cash in advance since this matter is getting traction.
36 posted on
02/15/2022 9:43:43 AM PST by
blackdog
(# We Are Corn-Pop, turn off the news.)
To: MarvinStinson
39 posted on
02/15/2022 9:46:25 AM PST by
Bratch
To: MarvinStinson
Sucks when the rules that you’ve been abusing for so long are used against you.
41 posted on
02/15/2022 9:52:01 AM PST by
qaz123
To: MarvinStinson
Sounds to me like Durham is over the target.
When's he going to open the bombay door and let the bombs fly?
45 posted on
02/15/2022 9:59:20 AM PST by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: MarvinStinson
I believe Durham is required to make court filings. I believe these filings are public information. Durham isn’t leaking to the press etc.
46 posted on
02/15/2022 10:00:33 AM PST by
carcraft
(Pray for our Country)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
