Posted on 02/10/2022 6:20:59 AM PST by Triple
So here is my brief takeaway:
Playing with fire, the vaccine manufacturers edited the natural spike protein sequence to gain translation efficiency. But they don’t know the full consequences of the edits. It is highly likely that unintended small proteins are being made. These proteins are completely untested as to their impact.
There are a lot of things in the vaxx. None of it good.
Hello, Pfizer (PFE) and FDA…
Please provide a full list of proteins that are coded in your “approved” mRNA injection.
Oh and the toxicity of each one.
Thanks in advance.
Your friend,
3
(Short PFE/ they in a heap o’trouble)
Nuts, isn’t it?
And it depends on your lot and your body’s reaction.
My parents both were immunized and showed no problems whatsoever.
My coworker has had his whole arm go numb for weeks and mind-splitting migraines he’s never had before.
Some teacher a few miles from here dropped dead in front of her class.
Yup - and this publication is a scientific takedown of biblical proportions.
Gene regulation/expression is very complex. Both environmental and inherent (DNA based) factors come together to impact gene expression.
Well now I understand. LOL! Like the song says, “Don’t Go Changin’”. Probably NOT a good plan to alter ones genetics. Especially when phrases like “not widely understood” are used in the explanation of what occurs when these modifiers are put in place.
🔬😨😷💉🐂💨💩💸
Microscopic razor blades and the AIDS virus is what I’ve read recently.
As I “tried”to read it I knew I was going to ask you for an explanation
So thanks.
Are we between a rock and a hard place?
Vaxxes don’t work and have side effects
Having even a mild case of COVID damages the heart
Did you vaxx?
I’d rather understand how long it took.
It seems to me that they were ready to go with something that they haven’t been able to do for any variant in more time.
That tells me that they had their “vaccine” when they had the virus, and have unleashed both onto the world.
The fact that they don’t fully know what they are doing, doesn’t surprise me.
Those points are not addressed in this article. Let’s keep this discussion scientifically unassailable.
(Open that can of worms on another thread, please.)
I’m way out of my depth here. But I’ve seen articles attempting to justify gain-of-function research because the researchers are trying to create “better vaccines”. It certainly gave me the impression that they were working on new vaccines are the primary (first) task. The development of new viruses would be the secondary task. So, when the virus hits, they are ready to roll out the super new vaccine.
It’s biowarfare at both ends: the virus is a weapon, and the vaccine is bigger weapon.
P4L
My vaxx status is irrelevant to the current understanding of the mRNA gene therapy experiment being conducted.
I might have been coerced by an employer to join the experiment, and I might have thought it was a good idea at the time given the fear created over Covid 19.
—Or —-
I might have know based on education and instinct that the gene therapy jabs, and the coercion to take them were a very dangerous step into the unknown.
Neither personal decision has any impact on the truth of the safety and efficacy of these gene based injections.
So, weapons are being used on the people of Earth right now. Sort of an undeclared war against humanity.
That, I believe.
Gain of function research is dangerous and idiotic.
What they did in the Wuhan lab wrt gain of function could never help. The odds of them replicating or predicting what might happen in nature are infinitesimally small.
So why do gof research? (No good answers to that.)
This is an important, but theoretical article.
Thus far, these investigators have not found evidence of proteins from overlapping genes as a result of the Covid mRNA vaccines, but they HAVE found Open Reading Frames, which are the snippets of genetic code that enable translation of unwanted proteins.
I suspect that there will be more to come on this subject.
Thanks for posting this.
Not saying this will happen, but there are to many uncertainties of what the long term consequences could be.
***This is the basic logic of it all (cost vs. benefit): take a vaccine with marginal efficacy (not effective for many strains nor long lasting), for an uncertain amount of long term risk.
***This is basically the risk (long term): Uncertain probability x uncertain magnitude.
This type of vaccine has the potential to generate all sorts of weird things years down the pipe. CJD can develop after 15 months to 10 years after being exposed. So who knows? The government nor pharma know, and anyone that says they do, is lying because it's all new and there are no long term tests or studies out that far for these vaccines they are now pumping into people.
I'm a E.E. and MBA, not M.D. or geneticist, but the basic reasoning here in terms of cost vs. benefit and risk do not seem to be logical. From a personal point of view, the clotting and myocarditis aside (short term), it's the potential of longer term risks that made me go through a massive amount of pain to deal with the coercive measures of my employer to force an experimental vaccine on me.
“Privacy rights” being violated aside, they do not have a right to make me participate in a massive pharma drug trial, violating “informed consent,” which has also been lost today seeing how we are using coercive measures and not entirely informing folks of all the potential risks.
But one thing is for sure, if things go sideways eventually, no one will be responsible, neither the policy maker nor pharma company, the small bureaucrat pushing the policies, or the person administering it.
This is all wrong!
I even hope it goes well and my fears are proven wrong eventually. But “hope” is not a method. Hope is a technique, but not a method, and it's not what you should build policies nor medical approvals for vaccines around.
:: Having even a mild case of COVID damages the heart ::
I’ve heard this from a number of “word-of-mouth” sources but no real medical source of proof.
Do you have a source I can read about this?
I believe that they use the “mild case damages the heart” to cover for vaccine injury.
I have seen no proof that recovered covid patients have damaged hearts either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.