Posted on 02/06/2022 5:49:15 PM PST by Babsig
That would be the logical next step.
This is a no-win for the truckers. I pray to God I am completely wrong but the government is too damn powerful and don’t care nothing for the people they represent. This will be a show of strength to bring down and install fear upon the peasants who come strongly against that elitist government. The USA and Canada peace loving freedom fighters will have to have fight their country’s civil war to defeat this evil! Other than that we’re screwed.
This is how the Kulaks must’ve felt.
The truckers are the new enemy class.
PRAYERS!!
I hope the truckers have that much conviction in their stance, otherwise this will turn out worse for them and anyone who fights the government there (and here).
Anyone want to predict a national truckers strike?
~~~~~~
That would be the logical next step.
Exactly.
Sad
This will come back to bite Justin Trudeau ... and his chief enabler, Jagmeet Singh
Sad
This will come back to bite Justin Trudeau ... and his chief enabler, Jagmeet Singh
Why doesn’t Trudeau do something about this? It is theft /s
Live Multi Stream here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ComQsBSZMtU
Thank you.
This is what I said earlier today.
The truckers, intentionally or not, have mounted a challenge to the regime.
Once the regime decided to stand, the stakes rose tremendously. For the truckers to win now, the government has to fall.
If the government does NOT fall (the probable outcome), then the truckers are going to be made to suffer tremendous harm, with no one to help.
Remember there is already a serious shortage of drivers. Several times I have seen the number 80,000 short.
Many less than 50% refusing to haul there will wreck the Trudy boy government.
Anyone want to predict a national truckers strike?
><><
I’d say it’s probable.
You’re welcome. It’s a good feed.
Every government building in Ottawa should be on fire. We play nice and continue to lose, same thing is about to happen here.
My thoughts exactly.
Went to Germany in the 80’s and talked to relatives who went through Nazism.
History repeats itself.
2nd Amendement matters.
Bookmark
I read the below identified article and one thing specifically sticks out like a sore thumb:
A second man connected to the protest, 37-year-old Andre Lacasse, was charged with carrying a weapon to a PUBLIC MEETING on Sunday, police said.
https://globalnews.ca/news/8587838/trucker-convoy-protest-arrests/
So a demonstration with crimes arresting participants at a later date as hey were no big deal at the time of the occurance, then there is a difference in a riot (insurrection) and a public meeting. So shouldn’t opening fire on the participants of a public meeting in the US killing one be considered an illegal use of force as the person shot was not threatening anyone climbing through a window at a public meeting? Goose/Gander. I guess I don’t understand the difference between a riot and a public meeting in D.c.
https://code.dccouncil.us/us/dc/council/code/sections/2-574
wy69
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.