Posted on 02/03/2022 6:16:52 PM PST by delta7
All of us who were saying because it was experimental and voluntary, referred to the insurance people who warned this would occur.
We were told we were lying by the vaxholes here.
What’s about time?
A French underwriter, oui?
I’m a little suspicious that this article doesn’t give the name of the insurance company. Not to say it didn’t happen, but...
“Unfortunately, no sources or court records are given, which is why the authenticity of the report cannot currently be verified…”
Court cases are among the easiest things to verify. The fact that none is forthcoming is extraordinarily suspect.
If it is only being reported on social media, it should be deemed a lie until shown otherwise.
Mandating employers are about to receive a big increase in lawsuits, I think. They have no government mandates to hide behind...
They will claim they did, at the time. Before the various courts halted them.
Yep. There you have it.
I’m sorry. This just didn’t happen.
One website quotes this as the “judge’s verdict:”
“The side effects of an experimental vaccine are being made public, and the deceased could not have professed ignorance when voluntarily taking the vaccine. There is no law or regulation in France requiring him to be vaccinated. Therefore, his death is, in fact, a suicide. The Court recognizes the qualification of an insurer who legally regards participation in the third phase experiment, the lack of evidence of which has not been proven, as the voluntary assumption of a fatal risk not covered by the contract, taking into account the declared side effects, including death is covered and legally recognized as suicide. The family filed an appeal. However, the insurer’s defense is recognized as reasonable and contractually justified, since this well-known risk of death is legally considered suicide, the client was notified and agreed to voluntarily risk his life without being forced to do so.“
———-
That’s a write up straight out of qtard land. Real judges don’t write like that.
Let us know when you have something more than an anti-vax fever dream.
More $ for my kin. We remain “NON GMO”.
There are still going to be enough employers who did it after the USSC ruling and enough victims. I think this is what will break the vax mandates once the first big case win comes in.
Under the Admiralty law based US system, certainly. Can the same be said for Napoleonic law based French jurisprudence? Maybe not so much, no?
The US court system isn’t based on Admiralty Law. It’s based on common law.
And yes, French court decisions are accessible, even though they don’t follow stare decisis.
https://libguides.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/law-french/cases
Bkmk
How do you figure?
My life insurance company sent me a letter detailing the exclusion of coverage for an experimental vaccination. My wife’s however did not send a letter. We as a family will never get that jab.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.