If Ivermectin Recognized, Justification for Lockdowns and Vaccine Mandates Would Evaporate: Doctor

The Epoch Times ^ | 01/19/2022 | Harry Lee, Nicholas VandenNieuwenhof

[thegagline]

Federal health agencies haven’t recognized ivermectin as an effective treatment for COVID-19 patients. According to Doctor Leland Stillman, the reason is more political than scientific, because otherwise there would be no basis for lockdowns or vaccine mandates.

“If ivermectin were recognized by the public health and academic establishment as the drug that it is, that treats acute viral illnesses, one of which is COVID-19, the entire justification for lockdowns, mandates, let alone vaccine research and development would evaporate overnight,” Stillman told The Epoch Times in a recent interview.

According to Section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (pdf), the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) can only issue emergency use authorization if certain criteria are met, including “there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product.”

So if there’s an approved alternative, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—an agency in HHS—can’t issue emergency use authorization for COVID-19 vaccines.

Stillman said it’s not a conspiracy theory or even an isolated opinion that ivermectin works for treating COVID-19, because tens of thousands of physicians all over the world have recognized its effectiveness.

The Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), a nonprofit organization working on protocols to treat patients with COVID-19, regards ivermectin as a core medication used in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Its website cites 142 studies, among which 93 are peer-reviewed, and 75 with results comparing treatment and control groups showing ivermectin works.

However, the FDA has repeatedly said that “currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19.” *** Stillman explained why many doctors are silent on recognizing ivermectin as an effective drug for COVID-19, a disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.

“And the reality that’s really important for people to understand is that doctors can lose their licenses or lose their board certification, which is very important for their income based on insurance guidelines, for speaking out as I have chosen to,” Stillman said.

Stillman said he is able to speak up because he’s one of very few doctors in the country who takes cash and doesn’t work with insurance companies. ***

[thegagline]

With Ivermectin, perhaps there would not have been lockdowns, mandates, vaccine passports, masks, mass testing, oppression, subjugation, supplication….

[Uncle Miltie]

Oh.noes. nonpossible. Must.follow.gates.frauduci.

[Candor7]

BKMrk.

[Jane Long]

With Ivermectin, perhaps there would not have been lockdowns, mandates, vaccine passports, masks, mass testing, oppression, subjugation, supplication…. …..

According to Doctor Leland Stillman, the reason is more political than scientific.

---

Well, gee, Dr Stillman…..welcome to the party.

Where’ve YOU been??

[BrexitBen]

The cheap, effective, safe drug against the China Virus that governments around the world ignored.

A crime of immense proportions.

[ViLaLuz]

Those responsible for this need to be charged and sentenced for capital crimes against humanity.

[granite]

Many people have been HAD! It will not be pretty when it finally unfolds.

[Equine1952]

This was spoke of before the pandemic crap was declared. I had ivermectin before this even took off. This the elite setting us up and lying to say it’s criminal is an understatement. IMO

[M1911A1]

It’s in the DARPA leak, and if they knew Ivermectin worked and did it anyway, people should swing.

After a fair trail, of course, if that exists for “the elites”.

[DIRTYSECRET]

*drug against the China Virus that governments around the world ignored.*

Haven’t poor, 3rd world countries turned to this drug? It’s cheap and available. It even deworms horses.

[rlmorel]

Yes, a meta analysis by Dr. Tess Lawrie that took 27 studies from all over the world about the use of Ivermectin in the early treatment of COVID showed reduction in COVID deaths by 65%. 65%. And that is the low end. Dr. Peter McCullough has stated that there could be an 85-90% reduction in deaths if the regimen he used to treat patient with were applied. Think of that. When discussing the effects of anti-viral drugs like Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine with someone who says it hasn't been proven effective (even though it has to varying degrees, which advocates of full vaccination and nothing else will argue the detail until the cows come home) have them consult this table and choose their level of ineffectiveness when administering a safe drug.

This way, they can choose what levels of fatalities are worth their slavish devotion to the vaccine-only narrative which excludes early treatment.

Also, it is widely accepted that the government tally of 837,000 dead due to COVID is completely unreliable (due to the government's classification of those dead WITH COVID-19 are dead BECAUSE of COVID-19, which is an utter fallacy. However, I will use that number simply BECAUSE it is their number. They are the ones who use it fallaciously and unethically, so I propose we should hoist them on their own petard.

This table shows in the left column the percent of patients who would have avoided hospitalization and death if given early treatment with Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine, based on the current government casualty total of 837,000 human beings.

LIVES SAVED WITH EARLY ADMINISTRATION OF ANTIVIRAL DRUGS

(BASED ON GOVERNMENT TOTALS OF 837,000 COVID FATALITIES AS OF 1/16/2022)

% Saved from hospitalization and death	Total Lives Saved
1	8,370
2	16,740
3	25,110
4	33,480
5	41,850
6	50,220
7	58,590
8	66,960
9	75,330
10	83,700
11	92,070
12	100,440
13	108,810
14	117,180
15	125,550
16	133,920
17	142,290
18	150,660
19	159,030
20	167,400
21	175,770
22	184,140
23	192,510
24	200,880
25	209,250
26	217,620
27	225,990
28	234,360
29	242,730
30	251,100
31	259,470
32	267,840
33	276,210
34	284,580
35	292,950
36	301,320
37	309,690
38	318,060
39	326,430
40	334,800
41	343,170
42	351,540
43	359,910
44	368,280
45	376,650
46	385,020
47	393,390
48	401,760
49	410,130
50	418,500
51	426,870
52	435,240
53	443,610
54	451,980
55	460,350
56	468,720
57	477,090
58	485,460
59	493,830
60	502,200
61	510,570
62	518,940
63	527,310
64	535,680
65	544,050
66	552,420
67	560,790
68	569,160
69	577,530
70	585,900
71	594,270
72	602,640
73	611,010
74	619,380
75	627,750
76	636,120
77	644,490
78	652,860
79	661,230
80	669,600
81	677,970
82	686,340
83	694,710
84	703,080
85	711,450
86	719,820
87	728,190
88	736,560
89	744,930
90	753,300

[\/\/ayne]

The first state that makes it over-the-counter will start the dominoes tumbling. Don’t wait for the legislature - Executive Order!

[dadfly]

yes but faschi and the cdc suppressed it with fake studies along with other early treatments.

[JohnBovenmyer]

> So if there’s an approved alternative, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—an agency in HHS—can’t issue emergency use authorization for COVID-19 vaccines.

True as far as it goes. BUT we could have our Ivermectin AND big Pharma could have its cake both. All that takes is for our AWOL government passing a little law making an exception to the above general law. Ie. in the face of what they’re calling an unprecedented emergency they do their jobs! Takes less time than impeaching Trump. At worst our drug doesn’t work and their choice remains profitable. At best we’re better quicker and Pharma’s loss provides more evidence for the broken window fallicy. What they don’t earn others will earn more instead.

[JohnBovenmyer]

States legalized pot, a much more tightly by feds regulated drug.

[uzumaki_naruto]

They need the pandemic to introduce the Great Reset. Read Klaus Schwab’s book.

1) Those who took the jab will:
* suffer immune disorders, requiring constant boosting
* some will die in the next 10 years from whatever underlying ailments the vax bring out
* some will die quicker in the next 3-5 years.
* many will be sterile.
* old people will die faster (they are giving a higher dose to the elderly for the booster shot thus more risk)

2) Economy will be crashed so everyone will be on UBI

3) Everyone will be chipped and monitored and every action will be controlled. Better not lose the social credit score!
We will be locked down either for the unending pandemic and/or climate.

[El Cid]

I had ivermectin before this even took off.

Yeah, but based on your name you are probably a horse, so you had easy access to the stuff. The rest of us (particularly if located in blue States) had to search around for off-shore pharmacies to provide… (and also be willing to sell to Spaniards that have been dead for 600 years)

[Cobra64]

Yup. Some of us have been promoting this as a Covid prophylactic and cure for over a year. In six months this will surface further and Fauci will(hopefully) be out of a job.

[Myrddin]

Ivermectin in 3 mg and 12 mg tablet sizes should be available over the counter. It is in most countries. Stock it like ibuprofen. Buy a small supply for the household medicine cabinet for use as necessary. Make enough ahead of need so that a large population can roll with a round of COVID-19 without clogging ERs and ICUs.

The mRNA vaxx has been widely applied. The consequences are showing up with disability and death. All cause deaths are up over 40% compared to the prior year before the vaxx rollout. Oncology wards are doing a land office business. Sports teams and celebrities are creating new job openings daily.

[metmom]

You are correct.

That was the whole point of banning the use of the stuff and forcing, or trying to, force the vaxxes.