Posted on 01/15/2022 8:38:37 PM PST by Impala64ssa
The judge called the boy’s psychological reports scary
The Loudoun County teenager charged with sexual assault at two separate high schools has been found guilty and sentenced to supervised probation in a residential treatment facility.
The Loudoun County Juvenile Court had previously found the male student "not innocent" of charges of forcible sodomy and forcible fellatio against a female student in a May 28 incident at Stone Bridge High School. The same student pleaded "no contest" in a separate case to two charges of abduction and sexual battery involving an incident at Broad Run High School on October 6, Fox News reported from the juvenile court. The student accepted a plea agreement in the October 6 case.
The judge told the boy that his psychological reports were scary and that he needed lots of help.
"You scared me. What I read scared me," she said explaining why for the first time in her career she put a juvenile on the national sex offender registry for life.
"Young man, you need a lot of help," the judge added.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Time to destroy the democrats in the state of Virginia.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Smote them hip and thigh, use the jaw bone of an Ox if we have to.
We need to rid ourselves of these Marxist psychopomps.We have nouse for a bumnch of commies who want us to be Venezuela II/Eff every one of them, with prejudice.
In a way, this guy’s a hero, since he probably did more to break the Democrat monopoly in Virginia than any Republican could dream of.
Once the soccer moms realized their kids weren’t safe in their ‘wonderful’ public schools, they knew things had to change.
“They got this done before the new AG took office today in VA.”
Good point...the new AG seems to be a firebrand and likely would have sent the guy to do some serious hard time. Close call for the Left, but they came through in keeping him out of jail (top priority for former slaves).
Two hundred years ago, serious felonies generally ended in hanging. Long-term kinds of sentences weren’t a big thing.
He’s still got one more court case to go through so he has to watch what he says.
Two hundred years ago, serious felonies generally ended in hanging.>>>>>>>>>>>>
He likely never would have even had a trial 200 years ago. The victims relatives would have administered immediate justice.
He’s been “dealt with”, probably.
In other words, he got off scot-free. A much more fitting punishment would be five minutes alone in a room with the father of one of the girls.
Ok that might explain it, although he could,have pointed that out if they were the case.
(Father of girl)...He was almost defending the kid- It was weird -....
.....
That’s what I’d do. He gets out faster, then.....
I'm not a lawyer. I've never heard of a "not innocent" verdict by a court. Is this common? How is it different from a "guilty" verdict?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.