Posted on 01/12/2022 8:32:20 AM PST by Eleutheria5
Murderer...
One of the very first things a new Republican administration must do is arrest, perp walk and prosecute Michael Byrd for the murder of Ashli Babbit. It will have to be done in America rather than in DC where it is impossible to obtain a fair trial.
They all know,damn well that Republicans and trump supporters are nowhere near as violent and vicious as antifa and blm. Thismis why they have to lie and make,crap up znd keep,repeating them lie that it was an inssurrdfionmover and over again, until the masses are brainwashed to beleive thst it was a coup attempt
They phony whelp act like a few punches thrown, and a few broken windows by what very likely were antifa and blam plants, (who,is ray epps?) was the worst attack since pearl harbor, and that all Trump supporters are violent domestic terrorist/extremists, whom they have likened Trump,supporters to repeatedly
The whole,thing reeks as bad as the dossier lie that they falsely impeached Trump over. It’s one wild lie after another with the left, and sadly several ‘republicans’ are going right along with the bald-faced lies as though they are gospel truth.
It’s a rigged system.
Remember Miriam Carey!
Also murdered by capital police!
If what you have written was true, we would have already heard it 100 times.
Must be nice... I doubt the Minneapolis police could have investigated and cleared Officer Derek Chauvin on the same day that George Floyd died and gotten away with it.
I take that you’ve never considered such tactics against unarmed American citizens just might be unconstitutional, immoral and wrong?
Byrd didn’t have his “principal” behind him - everybody he was “protecting” was gone. He fired without warning and killed an unarmed, small woman veteran.
People like you would have fit in well with the SS Deaths Head bunch - nobody questioned orders with them, either.
“
The officer was actively protecting a high value congressional level personnel behind a clearly barricaded cordon with that person / persons guaranteed protection at the same level as the leader of the free world while in that secured federal building. The crimes committed was breaching that clearly barricaded cordon while already actively committing another felony by being inside that secured area of that building to begin with. There will be no trial as no law was ever broken the officer did his duty in protecting his VIP from an angry mob who broke into a federally secured building, then broke into the high security area of that building and then yet again broke down the last line of defence between the protected persons and the mob three clearly illegal acts and a direct act of aggression towards the primary under protection. There will be no trial EVER the DOJ and the DC police both came to the same and correct conclusion that had this person not committed multiple felonies to even be there and had they not committed an act violence by BREAKING DOWN A SECURED and also barricaded with any available means to keep people on the other side of the door she would still be alive. A clearer message could not have been sent DO NOT COME THROUGH THIS DOOR. Everything about that cordon to a reasonable person says do not breach me bad things will happen if you do. She made poor choices and paid with her life for them.
What has to be asked is if POTUS was on the other side of that door would his SS detail have fired the answer is obviously absolutely if they didn’t they would all be not only fired but brought up on negligence charges. So why is it so hard to accept that congressmen who are given the very same level of state protection while actively doing their job and most importantly in that building while actively doing their constitutional duty on Jan 6th. Repeat it again congressmen while actively doing their constitutional duty and inside that building are protected to the SAME STANDARD as POTUS a co equal branch of government.
As many as you want if you are a BLACK DEMOCRAT!
Thank you for your perspective. I especially love the jargon that you use. It brings back memories of some of the planning we participated in with SWAT teams that we were going to be assisting taking down drug houses.
I guess that we watched different video of the same event. The video that I watched showed uniformed officers on both sides of the “barricade”, and the mob did not appear to be “angry” or threatening. And the “barricade” appeared to be in no danger of imminent breach other than people could probably have just walked around it with the invite of other capitol police that were standing amongst them. I personally have worked in the middle of actual angry mobs along with the police. Somehow the police managed not shoot anyone, even though at times I was punched, my helmet knocked off, I was spit on and yelled at.
“I would have opened up with automatic weapons fire on the first person to breach my inner and last cordon while actively protecting my primary from a mob threat.”
My feeling here is that you have added details that have been embellished by your own imagination. I am sorry that you were never actually were able to participate in a situation that you seem to have fantasized about. Since you likely are a white guy, you probably would be describing an actual situation like that during a time when the wardens allowed you to have internet access.
You did hear it the DOJ and the D.C. Police both said in clear terms the officer did his duty. That’s all they are required to say. They have no need nor place to discuss matters of National security as to the nature of how why when a d where VIP protection is used or implemented. The only must acknowledge that a protected person was behind those doors and force was used to protect them end of public review.
DEMOCRATS ARE LAW-LESS BECAUSE REPUBLICANS ARE BALL-LESS!
Baloney.
I have 11 years and 3 deployments starting in the 1990s in the Balkans all the way to the rock pile. I have sent many a round downrange. I saw the video that door was breached by violence a object used as a battering ram obviously breached that door. As to the cops milling around those were not tasked with security detail they looked lost in the chaos just trying to not aggravate the mob any more then they already were. It’s irrelevant they had no duty to protect a primary officer Byrd did we had locals we worked with all the time we never trusted them to do anything more than crowd control or outer perimeter security. Same for every other PSD team you only trust your guys period. It sucks she same poor choices but she would be alive had she not broke in to a secured federal building, into the secured area of it and then with the help of others into an area being used to shelter in place high value VIPs. The desired effect was had as soon as she was shot the crowd backed off the only thing in the.video I saw was from one angle it appeared as the shot crossed the friendlies in the path to the door that most likely is a product of camera angle you only shoot across friendlies in a last resort. I have done it right past and over the head of my partner Ryan with an M4 it was not ideal but needed to be done and I was and still am confident with that platform never once qualifying less than expert with it.
Apparently according to dems it is okay for black men to kill white women. Kind of like muslims who kill women is okay, too.
And the white libtard women accept this as a normal occurrence.
Fortunately it’s not up to you. The DOJ did the required after action review and also the internal investigation that happens after any use of force protecting a VIP. They found just cause for use of force so did the D.C.Police. Again not up to you. Using force is always a hard choice but necessary at times to protect someone of higher value than yourself or the person you are using force on. That’s just how life works. Get all.worked up it won’t change the fact the process that is accessible to the public is done. The findings are consistent with what would be expected in a mob scene. Lots of people are going to jail for breaking into that building which was such a stupid thing to do. Then obstructing Congress doubly stupid that’s a huge felony for what to take selfies and drink a beer. The battle should have been in the states BEFORE certification once the states sent their constitutional electors it’s clear in the constitution the path from there. Jan 6 was a huge mistake and it cost this woman her life for making poor choices. There simply is not law that officer Byrd broke while in commission of his duty the use of force is authorised if your last cordon is breached you can take it to the bank the sealed report has exactly that in it. You.don’t have to agree because it’s irrelevant what you think the DOJ who is tasked and has the power to decide has done just that. I’d be glad to have officer Byrd as my PSO if I was a VIP I know he won’t choke under pressure and get me killed. He is proven to be capable of doing his duty under pressure.
I’m going to start calling you Fred.
You dance around issues like Fred Astaire.
Fred, do you work with Byrd?
Fred, would you kill a 10 year old unarmed girl if she was in front?
Fred, are you even American?
Since when are government employees not accountable to the citizens of the US?
She was unarmed, nonviolent and there were numerous cops present. She could have been easily subdued without the use of deadly force. That was murder.
Your perceived view of this situation has been clouded by your imagination. There was no threat to any high value politicians from the unarmed people milling about with Byrd's Capital Police coworkers, his "guys" among them and at times guiding them. In any just world U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd would be facing decades behind bars or the hangman's noose. You have an issue that needs psychological treatment. If I were in charge of your care, I wouldn't allow you to be near any sharp objects let alone firearms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.