Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Holmes jury says it’s deadlocked on three counts, judge says keep deliberating
CNBC ^ | MON, JAN 3 20222:26 PM EST - UPDATED 38 MIN AGO | Yasmin Khorram

Posted on 01/03/2022 12:58:23 PM PST by Red Badger

KEY POINTS

Jurors in Elizabeth Holmes’ criminal trial told federal Judge Edward Davila on Monday that they can’t reach a unanimous verdict on three counts.

Davila gave them a so-called Allen charge, telling them to try harder.

The jury has been deliberating for about 46 hours over the course of seven days.

===================================================================

SAN JOSE, Calif. — The 12 jurors tasked with deciding the fate of Elizabeth Holmes told federal Judge Edward Davila on Monday morning that they’re unable to come to a unanimous verdict on three of the charges facing the Theranos founder.

Davila responded by calling the jurors into the courtroom and giving them a so-called Allen charge, an order for a deadlocked jury to continue deliberations. Should jurors fail to come an agreement, they could still reach a partial verdict on the remaining counts.

Holmes arrived at the San Jose, California, courthouse on Monday alongside her parents and her partner, Billy Evans. It’s her first appearance in the courtroom since Dec. 23, the last time the jury indicated it had a note for Davila. Holmes is staying at a hotel across the street and only shows up in the courtroom now when a notice is posted for the judge.

The jury has been deliberating for about 46 hours over seven days. They were handed the case on Dec. 17, following a three-month trial that featured 32 witnesses, mostly called by the prosecution. Holmes, 37, was the primary witness in her defense.

Davila read jury instruction No. 2 to the jurors on Monday. The instruction reminds them that Holmes is innocent until proven guilty and that the burden of proof is on the government.

It’s just the third time that jurors have produced a note for Davila. The first was on Dec. 21, when they asked if they could take instructions home for review. Davila declined the request, and said all deliberations must take place on-site. Two days later, they asked to listen to audio that they’d previously heard during the trial of Holmes and her conversations with some investors in the failed blood-testing company.

Jurors last convened on Wednesday. Having not arrived at a verdict at that point, they took the rest of the week off for the New Year’s holiday.

Holmes, who is charged with nine counts of wire fraud and two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted. She has pleaded not guilty.

After Davila sent the jury back into deliberations, Holmes walked over to her family seated in the next row back. She embraced Evans and her mom, and her dad then kissed her on the forehead.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: mgtow; redpill
Then give us the ones you ain't deadlocked on!...................
1 posted on 01/03/2022 12:58:23 PM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I hope this entitled fraud spends eternity in jail.


2 posted on 01/03/2022 1:18:42 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This is insane, this woman is an utter and completely fraud... I don’t know what charge they are deadlocked on, she has 11 charges against her.

However she better go away for at least 25-35 years, minimal.


3 posted on 01/03/2022 1:25:40 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Had it been Biden, Biden would have stripped down and taken a shower with his daughter.


4 posted on 01/03/2022 1:31:46 PM PST by Browns Ultra Fan (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

As long as it is guilty on the other 8....


5 posted on 01/03/2022 1:31:57 PM PST by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Did she get pregnant to get sympathy from the jury? Some men won’t want to convict a pregnant woman?


6 posted on 01/03/2022 1:46:17 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Its just another female centric narrative where they get convictions and sentences than their male counterparts.


7 posted on 01/03/2022 1:52:26 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Sounds like a couple of the jury room boys like girls with crazy eyes.


8 posted on 01/03/2022 3:05:42 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
She cried on the stand and claims she was a victim of domestic abuse from an employee and boyfriend. Had nothing to do with nothing, but there it was.

Chicks crying works! Ghislane should have tired it at her trial. I bet she would have had only half as many counts of conviction if she had.

9 posted on 01/03/2022 4:28:11 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Did she get pregnant to get sympathy from the jury? Some men won’t want to convict a pregnant woman?

No question. Just like Roxie Hart's (fake) pregnancy in "Chicago"!

10 posted on 01/03/2022 4:28:52 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I’m curious....did she change her voice back to normal for the crying? She’s always intentionally talked deeply for some reason. Some people thought she did that because it made her sound so unique or something. I’ve watched a couple of shows about her....she’s as guilty as the day is long.


11 posted on 01/03/2022 4:32:23 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Is this the woman/company that snookered some VIPs? Was General MadDog on the board? I should look it up.


12 posted on 01/03/2022 4:32:40 PM PST by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They are probably wimping out on the ones involving conspiracy - the ones with heavy sentences...


13 posted on 01/03/2022 4:33:06 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The Feds must not have gotten their cut. I know that Feds don’t give a damn about fraud, as long as they get their cut. Don’t give them their cut and they come down on you with both feet. The biggest criminal enterprise ever known to man kind is the Democrat Party.


14 posted on 01/03/2022 4:36:06 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

Yep...outrageous claims. She bilked almost a billion dollars out of investors...She used the fame and notoriety of some of them to encourage the throng of others that followed..


15 posted on 01/03/2022 4:40:05 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

“Is this the woman/company that snookered some VIPs? Was General MadDog on the board? I should look it up.”

Maybe, can’t remember. But she did have George Schultz on the board. Shultz is something like 90 years old didn’t come close to doing his oversight role.

Unfortunately for Holmes, Shultz’s grandson, who worked there (I think), is much younger, and didn’t mind blowing whistles...which made him one of the two insiders to finally bring her down.


16 posted on 01/03/2022 8:21:46 PM PST by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson