Posted on 11/27/2021 3:01:14 AM PST by Kaslin
Currently watching Roger Stone’s JFK assassination documentary. (2021)
It goes into great detail of the inconsistency and disputes almost everything from the Warren lie.
Highly recommend it.
“...Oswald spent time in Russia and had a Russian wife.”
His wife’s father was in the KGB.
Just like Jamie Gorlick being put on the 9/11 commission.
HS, I don’t think your theory is BS at all. I think it’s very close. I agree with your 1st sentence, but not with the 2d. I thought LBJ was behind it for a long time for exactly the reason you stated. But the reason I disagree with sentence #2 is because even though LBJ stood to benefit GREATLY, he did not benefit the most. I think LBJ was in it up to his ears, but I now believe that additional players were far more involved and benefitted far more. Deep State, oil interests, Central Bankers. I don’t have a theory on exactly who, but that’s the gist of it.
Re: Oswald. I think Oswald was in it up to his ears, too, but had no idea that he was being set up to take the fall. Same for Ruby.
Modern day version: Murder of Seth Rich. My bet is that he was murdered by MS-13 gang members (the analog of Oswald/Ruby), who were then in turn murdered by someone higher up in the chain.
In both cases, I doubt that anyone anywhere near the top of the DS food chain had an actual finger on a trigger.
Sometimes I wonder how many layers of murder there were.
“Whoever shot Tippit...was not Oswald, and that brings up various other questions.”
There were 12 witnesses who identified Oswald as Officer Tippits’ killer. Their testimony is in the Warren Report. You know, that thing you’ve never read.
It has always been Jackie.
He gave her an STD that he caught from porking everything that would hold still. This resulted in the death of their child.
You can understand her motive and you can also understand why they would cover it up.
Just so embarrassing.
And no Texas jury would convict her.
It was totally justifiable.
What goes into the Warrent Report, is what fits the narrative. There’s tons of issues with the report over timelines, which put Oswald in two locations at the same time (covering his school years, his Marine years, and period after his discharge). The only way to believe the timeline issues...is to believe there are two Oswalds walking around (sounding like some Monty Python explanation).
In other words you’ve never read the Warren Report and you just parrot stuff you’ve heard secondhand. But then the vast majority of people have never waded through that thing either and have no more idea of what’s in it than you do, so spouting b.s works. Mark Lane and the other conspiracy grifters sold a lot of books counting on that.
Chapter 4: “The Assassin”
Oswald’s movements after leaving the Depository and including the murder of Tippits
https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/chapter-4.html#tippit
“If there isn’t anything to hide, why did they hide it?”
Because if the American people knew that the Soviets had done it, which they did, the American people would DEMAND war with the Soviets.
Think about the context of the Cold War. Who had the most to lose? The Soviets. Who else? The Establishment in the US who would prefer not to be pushed into a war with the USSR.
Read later.
Ultimately, we will never know the truth.
To really understand it is to ask why, and who benefits.
It’s not clear that anyone benefitted in the long term. JFK was a lukewarm president at best, and had he finished his term, and been reelected, I don’t see how things in 1968 would have been substantially different.
The only ones who benefitted was the Southern democRATS, who were looking to stifle the Civil Rights Act which got passed in spite of them, only a few years later than it might have had JFK lived.
A conspiracy to kill JFK, would have had too many parts and players to have remained a secret, even now.
Oswald was a profoundly unhappy person (as all democRATS/communists are) and he was able to shoot and kill JFK, for his own reasons. I think there is a huge alignment of events, and Oswald did the deed on a one day impulse.
Consider what would have happened to Oswald had he missed. 15-20 years in jail (or less), and he could have extricated himself from his current (unhappy) life. That, I believe is what really drove him. The desperation of an unhappy man painted into a corner.
I think it was kept secret because factions in our own government were part of the assassination plot and certainly the coverup.
I think that video proves my point.
“Three hits in 5.2 seconds.”
Oswald is estimated to have fired three times in as few as 5.6 seconds and as many as 8.3 seconds. The video does NOT prove your point. Why don’t you try to explain your position instead of posting vague one sentence retorts. Otherwise I can’t take you seriously.
Edwin Walker was sitting stationary at a table in front of a living room window. Oswald, firing from a rested position less than 100 feet away with the same Carcano still missed the shot. Apparently his marksmanship skills improved exponentially between April and November of ‘63.
Seriously? Shooters always perform exactly the same every single shot? They never get lucky? They never have an off day? A nutty assassin never calms down after the first try? It’s not like Oswald was SAS or something. Or maybe Walker moved at the last minute, or the glass defected the bullet just enough. People who pick at this kind of stuff crack me up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.