Posted on 11/18/2021 5:34:39 AM PST by Pilgrim's Progress
Links will be provided at they become available.
Hoping to see this thing wrap up soon with a favorable verdict for our nation's hero - Kyle Rittenhouse and some legal jeopardy for ADA Binger and his buddy Krause (aka Fatlock).
The fact that this is taking three days is indicative of a severe problem on the horizon.
bump for later
“Fatlock.”
🤣
Fatlock claimed it was not his responsibility to provide the original HD version to the Defense and that the Defense should have noticed. That ridiculous wrong statement basically illustrates their entire prosecution, wrong at so many levels.
This has turned into a circus, the judge should have studied the mistrial motion and put the prosecution under oath and brought in video experts before this thing went sideways. The judge failed Kyle. Kyle is not getting justice.
“Lunchbox”
The facts are clear, but jury intimidation is a real factor.
My guess is a hung jury, not because they don't know, but out of pure fear for their life after court.
They know that someone in the jury room will leak out the names and votes and the blm and antifa goons will visit them at night.
“Our nation’s hero….”
That’s some Soviet level propaganda wording, right there.
The kid is innocent. But “Nation’s hero?” That’s a bit of a stretch.
That’s hilarious.
How can this be taking so long? Either there are committed woke-warriors on the jury, or they can’t bring themselves to acquit and endanger their families and themselves, I think.
Seems to me a hung jury is brewing.
Has anyone really seen or understand the high definition video on the TV and what it shows or does not show?
*
Didn’t he also admit — which, if I’m correct, didn’t come up until the last few days — that the video was given to the detective by a mysterious, unidentified person? Chain of custody?
I’m not buying the new theory that the video was taken (i.e. stolen) from Fox News (who paid a large sum of money for it), but at this point I wouldn’t put it past the prosecution either. And, boy, what a cherry on top that would be if true...
Likely a couple of Karen’s on the jury according to Barnes sources
Yeah a quick verdict is usually a good sign for the defense, and a long deliberation a bad sign. However in this case its not surprising they would take their time since although its very obvious Kyle is innocent, the jurors themselves may fear the rage mobs that decided to attack Kyle if they find him innocent...particularly if they appear to have done so quickly. My guess is it will be a hung jury with some afraid to covict and others refusing to condemn an innocent kid. Further I suspect the case will then be declared a mistrial with prejudice due to the misconduct by the prosecutors.
Yesterday the jury asked if they can see the videos and play them back without limit.
The Judge is still trying to deal with the high-res vs. low-res drone video problem.
Since the high res version of the drone footage was never entered into evidence, only the low res version was entered by the defense, the Judge cannot give the high res version to the jury.
The high res version more clearly shows that Kyle did not point his gun at anyone prior to being chased by Rosenbaum, which undercuts the prosecution’s argument that Kyle provoked the chain of events.
One of four things are going to happen:
1) The jury returns a verdict of not guilty, and everybody is off the hook.
2) The jury returns a guilty verdict on at least one charge, or lesser included crimes, and Kyle has potential reversible error on appeal.
3) The Judge calls a mistrial, and we do this all over again.
4) The Judge calls a mistrial with prejudice, and the whole thing is over.
The Judge is not going to declare a mistrial either with or without prejudice, so the Judge is hoping for a not guilty verdict from the jury to bail him out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.