Skip to comments.
President Trump Responds on Pennsylvania’s 2020 Election
Donald Trump writes a letter to the editor.
Wall Street Journal ^
| Oct. 27, 2021
| Donald Trump
Posted on 10/28/2021 6:51:43 AM PDT by DeplorablePaul
In your editorial “The Election for Pennsylvania’s High Court” (Oct. 25), you state the fact that a court wrongly said mail-in ballots could be counted after Election Day. “This didn’t matter,” you add, “because Mr. Biden won the state by 80,555, but the country is lucky the election wasn’t closer. If the election had hung on a few thousand Pennsylvanians, the next President might have been picked by the U.S. Supreme Court.”
Well actually, the election was rigged, which you, unfortunately, still haven’t figured out. Here are just a few examples of how determinative the voter fraud in Pennsylvania was:
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2020election; fixnews; rememberarizona; rememberthesteal; rupertmurdoch; trump; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: SmokingJoe
To: marcusmaximus
The WSJ opinion/editorial board are far more conservative and Trump friendly than that of the NYT.
The NYT are foaming at the mouth really hate President Trump. It’s not even debatable.
I am surprised you are even arguing this point.
To: SmokingJoe
To: SmokingJoe
To: marcusmaximus
One editorial from WSJ doesn't even come close to equaling another thousand or so “We hate Trump” editorials from the NYT.
To: SmokingJoe
The 3 WSJ editorials I sent you are only a sample.
1. Trump’s grievances
2. Trump won’t win another national election
3. Trump should resign
It’s sad how you defend these editorials.
Show me an example of WSJ editorial board supporting Trump.
To: marcusmaximus
It's like you are comparing Fox News to “We hate Trump” CNN or MSNBC.
Fox News have their faults, but no one in his right mind would compare Fox to CNN.
Fox still has Tucker. They have Greg Gutfield. They have Judge Jeanine. Etc etc
CNN has Cuomo, Acosta, Don Lemon etc etc.
Only a fool would say they are the same as Fox.
To: DeplorablePaul
Senator Cris Dush Senator Doug Mastriano PA State Rep. Frank Ryan Email a copy to Cris Dush. I've included his address above. I have been replying to him as he is sends updates on his "investigation"
To: marcusmaximus
For every anti Trump editorial from the WSJ, there are at least a hundred viciously anti Trump editorials, opinion pieces from the NYT.
What planet are you living on?
To: SmokingJoe
I am calling out the WSJ editorial board.
Show me any WSJ editorial board pieces that supported Trump.
I’ve given you three that are just as deranged as anything from the NYT, WAPO:
1. Trump’s grievances
2. Trump won’t win another national election
3. Trump should resign
To: kvanbrunt2
To: marcusmaximus
Go back to your first post to me on this thread # 15. You claimed the WSJ was worse than the NYT.
That is not even close to reality.
Only a far left troll like you would make such an outlandish suggestion.
To: SmokingJoe
Did you read the WSJ carbon offsets article this week?
To: DeplorablePaul
Good for him. We finally have a Republican who got the shaft and isn’t being quiet about it. May he eventually carry the day.
34
posted on
10/28/2021 7:51:30 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(Republicans are all honorable men.)
To: marcusmaximus
Show me any WSJ editorial board pieces that supported Trump. Show me ANY NYT editorial board piece that supported President Trump or any GOP presidential candidate in contemporary times.
Trump won't win another national election
3. Trump should resign
The NYT says that all the time.
They exist to trash President Trump.
To: marcusmaximus
You can’t compare two publications by just quoting one publication and totally ignoring the far worse publication which is the NYT.
To: DeplorablePaul
President Trump’s letter in its entirety:
President Trump Responds on Pennsylvania’s 2020 Election
Donald Trump writes a letter to the editor.
Oct. 27, 2021 2:15 pm ET
In your editorial “The Election for Pennsylvania’s High Court” (Oct. 25), you state the fact that a court wrongly said mail-in ballots could be counted after Election Day. “This didn’t matter,” you add, “because Mr. Biden won the state by 80,555, but the country is lucky the election wasn’t closer. If the election had hung on a few thousand Pennsylvanians, the next President might have been picked by the U.S. Supreme Court.”
Well actually, the election was rigged, which you, unfortunately, still haven’t figured out. Here are just a few examples of how determinative the voter fraud in Pennsylvania was:
• 71,893 mail-in ballots were returned after Nov. 3, 2020, at 8 p.m., according to Audit the Vote PA. None of these should have been counted according to the U.S. Constitution and the state Legislature, which didn’t approve this change.
• 10,515 mail-in votes from people who do not exist on the Pennsylvania voter rolls at all.
• 120,000 excess voters are not yet accounted for by the Pennsylvania Department of State—far more votes than voters!
• From 2016 to 2020, during my term as president, Republicans out-registered Democrats 21 to 1. This translated to a 659,145-vote lead at 12:38 a.m. on election night, with “Trump” up a full 15 points.
• Hundreds of thousands of votes were unlawfully counted in secret, in defiance of a court order, while Republican poll watchers were thrown out of buildings where voting took place.
• 39,771 people who registered to vote after the Oct. 19, 2020, deadline, still voted in the 2020 election—simply not allowed.
Highly respected Audit the Vote PA found numerous data integrity problems the Pennsylvania Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE) system, including:
• 305,874 voters were removed from the rolls after the election on Nov. 3rd.
• 51,792 voters with inactive voter registrations at the end of October 2020 nevertheless voted.
• 57,000 duplicate registrations.
• 55,823 voters who were backfilled into the SURE system.
• 58,261 first-time voters 70 years and older.
• 39,911 people who were added to voter rolls while under 17 years of age.
• 17,000 mail-in ballots sent to addresses outside of Pennsylvania.
• Another analysis of Montgomery County, Pa., found 98% of the eligible voting population in the county was already registered to vote—not possible.
• A canvass of Montgomery County has identified 78,000 phantom voters, with roughly 30% of respondents unaware that there are people registered and voting from their address.
• One nursing home in Lancaster County had 690 registrations and an extremely high turnout rate of 85% in 2020, while nursing homes were closed due to Covid. One of these residents said she had not voted in the past 3 years, but had a mail-in ballot cast in her name.
• 25,000 ballots were requested from nursing homes at the exact same time.
• Numerous reports and sworn affidavits attested to poll watcher intimidation and harassment, many by brute force.
• Attorney General Bill Barr ordered U.S. Attorney Bill McSwain to stand down and not investigate election irregularities.
• Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook poured over $17 million to interfere in the Pennsylvania election, including $5.5 million on “ballot processing equipment” in Philadelphia and $552,000 for drop boxes where the voting pattern was not possible.
And so much more! This is why Democrats and the Fake News Media do not want a full forensic audit in Pennsylvania. In reality, 80,555 ballots are nothing when there is this much corruption or voter irregularities.
Donald J. Trump
Palm Beach, Fla.
Appeared in the October 28, 2021, print edition as ‘President Trump Responds on Pennsylvania.’
37
posted on
10/28/2021 8:05:31 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Yo-Yo
I linked to the full letter. Didn’t it work?
To: DeplorablePaul
39
posted on
10/28/2021 8:17:40 AM PDT
by
Pollard
(PureBlood)
To: DeplorablePaul
I linked to the full letter. Didn’t it work? The full letter is available at the WSJ only for subscribers. I have a subscription through work, so I just posted the entire letter for those who can't see it.
40
posted on
10/28/2021 8:24:11 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
