Posted on 10/26/2021 2:12:37 PM PDT by Mount Athos
Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) is requiring parents to sign a form comparable to a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) to view a portion of the district’s new curriculum inspired by critical race theory, according to documents reviewed by the Daily Caller.
As part of LCPS’ broader equity agenda, the district spent approximately $7,700 to become a “licensed user” of Second Step Programs, a branch of the left-leaning non-profit organization Committee for Children. According to a copy of the NDA-style form reviewed by the Daily Caller, “eligible parents” at LCPS must sign the document to view the Second Step curriculum.
Curriculum presentations can only be given in person and parents cannot broadcast, download, photograph, or record “in any manner whatsoever.” Downloadable files of part of the curriculum are available on LCPS’ website, per Second Step’s copyright policy.
“I understand that the Authorized Presentation of Second Step Materials I am about to view is not a public event, and that copying, broadcast or recording of any kind is not permitted,” the form reads. “I agree to comply with the terms of the above Special License.”
According to the district’s agreement with Second Step obtained by the Daily Caller, the curriculum is not subject to traditional Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) laws.
Scott Mineo, ring-leader of Loudoun County’s Parents Against Critical Theory (PACT) organization, told the Daily Caller that he finds the copyright laws suspicious as similar curriculum packages are readily available for parents to review.
“LCPS is partners with Southern Poverty Law Center, Racial Equity Tools, and Learning for Justice (SPLC), all of which have copyrighted material, however, LCPS freely provides access to these materials,” Mineo said. “Why is there such a double standard when parents want to review Second Step SEL material in its entirety?”
Loudoun County Public Schools did not respond to the Daily Caller’s request for comment.
Second Step’s programming revolves around the concept of “social-emotional learning,” which is linked to the core tenets of critical race theory. According to Committee for Children, the non-profit behind Second Step curriculum, SEL is “fundamental to achieving social justice.”
The non-profit is also dedicated to “diversity, equity, and inclusion” and becoming an “anti-racist organization.” Part of Second Step’s curriculum addresses “anti-racism,” a term coined by activist Ibram X. Kendi. It also creates a “common language” to “create lasting systematic change.”
“When we all use the same words — for emotions, situations, and behavioral dynamics — it promotes empathy and understanding between students, teachers, staff, parents, and the community,” the curriculum reads. “Second Step provides a shared emotional vocabulary that can create lasting systemic change.”
Second Step curriculum borrows from Learning for Justice, the education arm of the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as well. In July 2020, an LCPS spokesman told the Washington Free Beacon that Learning for Justice resources would be “optional” in the district.
According to a newly released PowerPoint from LCPS, the district will require all elementary schools to implement SEL in the classroom by 2022. Images in the PowerPoint link directly to Second Step curriculum. The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) has also been working to institute SEL into the curriculum state-wide. (RELATED: Virginia’s Department Of Education Wants To Institute ‘Social-Emotional Learning’ State-Wide)
Second Step is used in a slew of other districts nationwide including in Toppenish, Washington, Chicago, Illinois, Tooele, Utah, Austin, Texas, Lee County, Florida, Denver, Colorado, Lexington, Kentucky and more.
Parents in Loudoun County are worried about the new curriculum as SEL emphasizes the moral, ethical and emotional development of students over their academic success. The push for such a curriculum led the VDOE to explore ending advanced degrees, according to Fox News.
A Utah music teacher, who resigned his position with Draper Park Middle School after being required to teach Second Step’s SEL programming, gives the public a brief insight into the curriculum. Teacher Sam Crowly said in his resignation that he could not “in good conscience” present material that “teaches students that their parents are ‘roadblocks’ to their goals; material which contains propaganda, and encourages students to become activists.”
Sure...I’ll sign it, but you’ll no longer get tax $$ from me.
I am confused.
If they are teaching this material, how can they claim that it is not public information? The contention that information given to a room full of kids is private information is ludicrous.
Perhaps they can prevent copying, but I see no way they can prevent conversation and verbal exchange which includes the material being taught.
The parents need a lawyer expert in copyright law and is a fighter in court.
Is the NDA under penalty of perjury?
I would be arrest if I wrote what I was thinking. When do reasonable and god fearing people take care of the mess we are in?
School personnel should IMMEDIATELY be Arrested for Felony Extortion. Taxpayers have a RIGHT to this curriculum.
Let the lawsuits begin.
Extortion.
Not legally binding.
Tar. Feathers. Rail.
I suspect that this runs afoul of public records laws.
Wrap the unsigned NDA-style around some broken glass and tell the Loudoun County Public Schools they can use it as a suppository.
the left-leaning non-profit organization Committee for Children...
I really despise the term “non-profit”. Many people reflexively think a non-profit must be good because....they don’t aspire to make a profit. However, they make up for this by paying their officers & staff exorbident salaries. It is a very good career choice.
IMHO, non-profits are even worse than the “military-industrial complex” that Eisenhower railed about.
They paid for the curriculum, they have a right to see it whether they sign the form or not. Sue ‘em!
By contract a school district exempts itself for FOIA? Is t that convenient!
Sign it and ignore it. Post it on Free Republic anonymously.
Pearson was the one who Fedzilla bought into for Commie Core.
In a sane world, the school board would be required to cancel any contract that demanded these terms and be legally forbidden from entering into any future contracts that attempt to impose such restrictions on content review by parents.
It’s up to the voters in that district to decide if they want to live in a sane world or not.
if this is made into a federal case, that should go out the window... yes?
So you can view a portion of the CRT program, the they have decided you can see. I say get rid of them all and the superintendent don’t fall for any of their crap
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.