Loudoun Co. judge rules teen sexually assaulted girl in school bathroom

WTOP ^ | 10/25/2021 | Neil Augunstein

[markomalley]

A 14-year-old Loudoun County, Virginia, high school student charged with two counts of sexually assaulting a schoolmate in a bathroom has been found guilty in an adjudicatory hearing in Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court.

During opening statements of the two-hour hearing, Loudoun County prosecutor Barry Zweig said the two teens chatted daily on the Discord app, in the weeks leading up to the May 28, 2021, incident at Stone Bridge High School, in Ashburn.

The teens had “sexually charged conversations,” and had engaged in consensual sexual relations twice in weeks prior, in a bathroom at the school.

On May 28, the boy texted the girl and asked her to meet him in the girls bathroom, and she agreed. However, during that encounter, he forced himself on her, without her consent.

[Maris Crane]

It’s bad enough that teens this age are full of “confusion and wonder and wanting to belong and wanting to “please” a potential “boyfriend,” but the atmosphere and decadent teaching at the school DID NOT HELP.

All teens go through this rough time in their lives, but the ADULTS, TEACHERS, ADMINISTRATORS, PARENTS ARE SUPPOSED TO HELP THEM THROUGH IT. THAT’S WHAT NORMAL PEOPLE DO.

The Perfect Storm presents itself and when no one with common sense to help, descends into what this event shows.

From my point of view, the TEACHERS WHO TEACH NOTHING BUT RACE HATRED AND SEX EXPERIMENTATION are guilty!

SAD. GET YOUR CHILDREN OUT OF PUBLIC SCHOOL AND PAY ATTENTION.

As a parent, I had to do it.

[null and void]

I guess the boy thought he’d become a pro at the girls bathroom thing after the first one.

I guess the boy thought he’d become a pro at the girls bathroom thing after he got away Scott-free with first one.

[the_individual2014]

You would figure in the Me Too era this would not happen. I wonder what happened to believe all women, did that take a backseat or something to LGBTQ /sarc.

[Albion Wilde]

Not a great case for our side. The girl had consensual relations with the boy on two prior occasions in the school bathrooms, agreed to meet him in the bathroom again but did not agree to sex, according to the judge’s findings.

I wish the written material specified what type of "consensual relations" they had previously. Was is penetration, oral sex, or mere fondling?

Nevertheless, the presence of any "person" with a penis in the girl's bathroom provides a private setting for sexual behaviors that violate the purpose of a public school.

[StAnDeliver]

"Not a great case for our side. The girl had consensual relations with the boy on two prior occasions in the school bathrooms, agreed to meet him in the bathroom again but did not agree to sex, according to the judge’s findings. An unsurprising result of a sexually amoral culture and lax school supervision, with transgenderism a contributory rather than a primary factor."

There's no consent in Virginia's statutory rape laws, you brain-dead moron. That's why it's called "statutory rape". Piss off.

[heartwood]

A Class 4 misdemeanor?