Posted on 10/24/2021 4:51:52 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Covid-19 vaccines appear to inhibit the body’s natural ability to produce antibodies, leaving vaccinated people vulnerable to infection.
The alarming information was contained in the UK government’s latest “Covid-19 vaccine surveillance report,” which noted that “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.”
Vaccine researcher Alex Berenson first highlighted the UK government’s alarming admission, warning it means vaccinated people will never be able to acquire full immunity even after they’ve recovered from an infection.
“What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus,” Berenson explained.
“Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.”
The result is “vaccinated people will be far more vulnerable to mutations in the spike protein EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND RECOVERED ONCE,” Berenson writes.
“It also means the virus is likely to select for mutations that go in exactly that direction, because those will essentially give it an enormous vulnerable population to infect. And it probably is still more evidence the vaccines may interfere with the development of robust long-term immunity post-infection.”
Berenson’s research dovetails with results from an independent study conducted by an Illinois physician who demonstrated how the Covid vaccine suppresses the body’s adaptive immune system, leaving vaccinated individuals more susceptible to illness and possibly explaining the phenomenon of “breakthrough infections.”
“If they have this low [immunity] and it stays and it persists… and that adaptive immune system response persists… it’s going to have a bad response to any other kind of viral infection,” claimed Dr. Nathan Thompson.
“If you looked at that blood work, would you say that this person is very susceptible to having another viral infection, and maybe…you just might call it a breakthrough infection, you guys see that? A breakthrough infection.”
“Could it be that after this maybe this is happening in a lot of people and leaving them wide open to have breakthrough infections after that?” the doctor questioned, imploring other doctors to conduct their own tests.
Covid vaccine developer Dr. David LV Bauer also admitted the jabs destroy the body’s immune response, lowering crucial antibodies necessary to fight off disease.
their plan was to depopulate for China and Gates,
genocide by GOF-virus and then the fake”VAX”
Ordered, and Mandated to rape everyone’s DNA
... without informed consent.
so, every death, every coverup, is a “win” for them;
week after week, day after day.
I’m not sure that cheesy news sources like this are the the best thing when it comes to advancing your case.
#KillYourNaturalImmunity
#ShortenYourTelomeres
#MadCowDusease
#Hospitalization
#Death
#Maiming
#Disability
… let us no when the compromised liberal media covers this
But cheesy anonymously sourced news sources like The New York Times, Washington Post, National Propaganda Radio, etc. are A-OK, right?
So covid is just the flu but if you aren’t as immune as unvaccinated recovered patients it’s deadly. Good grief. Makes no logical sense.
Touché.
Chessy article source or not, there are direct quotes in the article that one can pursue.
lol kill the messenger when you don’t like the message..yeah that’s the ticket
I read a pile of stuff posted at the NIH about ADE and Covid not just the vaccines and it seems that this is a re very real componenet of the SPike protein which is mhat the mrna manufactures ( i think) so it follows. also sars and mers and one thing i read said sars2 has 2.5% mortality where mers had 29% as i recall.
except that’s not what the study said:
“Natural infection produces antibodies to the nucleocapsid and all fragments of the spike protein. The highest antibody levels were against the nucleocapsid, full-length spike protein, and the S2 subunit. ***Antibody levels against RBD were weak and could be a mechanism for new virus variants to evolve*** and “Antibodies from natural infection do not have high levels against the RBD. This could be because the RBD epitope may be hidden to prevent host immune recognition. The less robust and variable antibody response to natural infection suggests immunity acquired by natural infection may not be as strong as that from vaccination. “We should not assume that previously infected individuals are immune or that they cannot transmit the virus,” write the authors.”
and
Vaccinated individuals showed high antibody levels against the full-length spike protein, S2 subunit, and much higher levels to the RBD and S1 subunit. These individuals also had cross-reactive antibodies between the spike protein and RBD, absent in natural infection.
The mRNA vaccine likely adopts a protein conformation that presents cross-reactive epitopes. ***This could be useful against emerging virus variants ***and suggests the antibodies produced could still be effective against them.
That’s a logical fallacy known as ad hominem, attacking the source.
Just address the veracity of the assertions without casting aspersions on their sources.
The hypothesis that the vax compromises the immune system was something I came to the conclusion on my own over a year ago.
I truly hoped that I was wrong, in addition to the threats posed by ‘weak vaccines’ (now a reality).
However, the UK article I saw posted a few days to a week ago on the vax causing AIDS was over the top without merit.
I, too, am in the camp awaiting either a wave of illness among the ‘vaccinated’ or a new pandemic resulting both from it and the extended isolation from the lockdowns.
Again, I hope that I’m wrong: My parents are among that group, but it is what it is and I’ll violently oppose being forcefully or otherwise coercively jabbed.
Which wont apply to most of you should make you wonder how they DO NOT know anout Mrna.
I bet before this study many people here ..who defend mrna vax...would say mrna could not do such a thing
We are many many years from them ever knowing about this vax
Agreed.
Lots of blogs and nobody websites reading into it what they want.
Sorry for profanity but these “scientists” are nothing but A-holes.
You do know that microrna and messenger rna are not the same thing?
No...but my point remains...a lot they dont know. The mrna in this story doesnt normally do what this study says...typically its gene related.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.