Posted on 10/19/2021 1:04:06 PM PDT by Red Badger
Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen has relented in response to backlash over a controversial proposal by Democrats that would have allowed the IRS to gain information from any American bank account with more than $600 of activity in a year.
The measure initially came to light as a part of Democrats’ $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill. Trying to head off concerns from moderates, Democratic leaders and rank-and-file lawmakers have desperately marketed the bill as being completely paid for with no substantial effect on the deficit or national debt.
One proposal to achieve that end was the IRS measure. Despite immediate backlash, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Yellen adamantly defended the planned IRS overhaul.
Yellen, the former Chairwoman of the Federal Reserve who took control of the Treasury in January, said the measure is designed to target wealthy Americans who hide income from the IRS. Because of the measure, Yellen said the IRS will be able to collect more taxes from the wealthy and close the “tax gap.”
“We have a tax gap that over the next decade is estimated at $7 trillion, namely a shortfall in the amount that IRS is collecting due to a failure of individuals to report the income that they have earned,” Yellen said.
Now, Yellen has somewhat changed course, supporting a raise in the reporting threshold from $600 to $10,000.
While still supporting the broad goal of closing the so-called “tax gap,” she relented on key aspects of the program.
“Under the current system, American workers pay virtually all their tax bills while many top earners avoid paying billions in the taxes they owe by exploiting the system,” she said. “At the core of the problem is a discrepancy in the ways types of income are reported to the IRS: opaque income sources frequently avoid scrutiny while wages and federal benefits are typically subject to nearly full compliance.”
“This two-tiered tax system is unfair and deprives the country of resources to fund core priorities.”
However, responding to concerns that the program would target middle class and low-income Americans, Yellen announced several changes to the original measure.
Foremost, the reporting threshold will be raised to $10,000, addressing a key concern from critics who considered $600 to be too low to merit IRS snooping.
Yellen also announced an “exemption” from the measure “for wage earners like teachers and firefighters.” It is not yet clear whether this exemption will extend to other middle class wage earners in the private sector.
Yellen applauded these new proposals for “protecting American workers.”
“Today’s new proposal reflects the Administration’s strong belief that we should zero in on those at the top of the income scale who don’t pay the taxes they owe,” Yellen said.
She concluded, “We will e to work with leaders in Congress to enact this important measure to level the playing field for workers and small businesses, and raise revenue to build our economy back better.”
Republicans have criticized the proposal since it became public.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said, “This surveillance program crosses a line,” calling the program “un-American.”
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said that Democrats “want to finance their spending spree by effectively treating every ordinary American as if they were under IRS audit.”
“I must have forgotten when the president campaigned on giving everybody their own audit,” McConnell quipped.
Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) decried the plan in a statement as “[violating] the liberty of every freedom-loving American who values their financial privacy.”
In her younger days she helped create this very system that she now complains about.
But her complaint is non-sequitur.
She complains that the wealthy are ‘exploiting the system’ which when you analyze that statement means they are following THE LAWS!..................................
The 7 trillion shortages likely come from illegals.
But this a totally smells of more corruption,anyhow.
Yes, typical liberal tactic.
Go for the gold, settle for silver.
Call it ‘compromise’, ‘bipartisanship’, etc.
When you compromise with EVIL, you just get more EVIL................
Ha ha!
After this coming round of inflation, $10,000 will BE the new $600!!
Illegals typically don’t use banks. They deal strictly in cash. I’ve seen them at Walmart pay for their 3-4 carts full of groceries with a wad of cash that would literally choke a horse..................
$10k or $10T makes no difference, it’s still unconstitutional. What they are doing is making the IDEA look legitimate to their ignorant, uneducated base..................
Everyone should be ‘exempt’ because the very IDEA is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!...............
It may end up that people find alternative places to invest there money. However,I don’t think they want to destroy banking.
I think the real objective is for the fed state to force people into compliance (authoritarian control and power) by being able to lock access to their money by locking their accounts.
And also coming up a with bogus reason to seize larger accounts.
I saw it.......................
ISWYDT............................
Of course not. She went to Yale....................
And has been for decades. It's the 'leaking' that bothers Americans...................
She is selling the IDEA that it is a legitimate function, the amount doesn’t matter.....................
The emperor has no clothes...
It’s the IDEA that she is pushing is the point. The amount is not..................
In front of female SS agents..................
And cell phones and Cadillac SUVs and humongous houses amd 100” TVs..................
Bank(s) plural.
They want ONE GLOBAL BANK UNDER THEIR CONTROL......................
If it becomes law, it certainly would be litigated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.