Posted on 10/15/2021 8:52:33 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The good news is that the vaccinated are immune from the virus so they cannot catch it or pass it on to others...
Oh wait....
“...you are trespassed from all University property...”
Is that even proper grammar? I have never heard the word ‘trespass’ used that way.
Kinda reminds me of the hilarious old sign:
“Trespassers will be violated.”
;-)
they are education majors. give them a break.
My daughter earned her Masters Degree from CSU. When she heard that they were threatening to arrest unvaccinated students, she call the alumni association and told them that they should not count on any financial support from her.
She said that they weren’t answering the phones. So she left a phone message and sent an email.
When she emailed me about contacting the alumni association, I expressed concern for the poor jail inmates who would be exposed to these thoughtless students! /s
It actually is, and it’s a legal term. If someone is ‘trespassed,’ it means they have been officially notified that they are trespassing by law enforcement or other legally authorized personnel and that further presence on the property will result in arrest and incarceration. Official notice has been made as well in the record keeping system.
When police officers arrive to, say, a Karen making a scene because she didn’t get free food and she refuses to leave, they will ask if the manager wants the Karen ‘trespassed’ or if they simply want her removed and told to not come back.
Ok, it is a term used by cops but is it grammatically correct? Not necessarily the same thing. Just asking...
soo- they say “We’re not arresting unvaxxed people, but any unvaxxed people on grounds will be arrested for trespassing”
kinda like saying “We’re not peeing on your leg” while dumping a bucket full of urine on someone’s leg-
Short answer: Yes, or at least it is not incorrect.
Long answer: https://www.visualthesaurus.com/cm/dictionary/trespassers-will-be-trespassed/
Interesting, thank you for that. I read the long explanation and it more or less supports the idea that this use of trespass is not seen prior to 1990, so in my completely idiosyncratic book, that means it gets a failing grade.
Anyone making the arrest will be wearing a hazmat suit? If not, they could become superspreaders.
It is, as a legal term.
This bullshit has gotten way outta hand! They want arms?
Consent under duress is not consent under the law.
-PJ
From that link every definition is related to an attack or act of war. Nothing in it about my employer can force me to take X health treatment.
The problem is that there are no available vaccines that are not EUA, therefore the EUA requirements must apply when the vaccine is authorized under that code in the US law.
That means that a recipient of an EUA drug MUST be given the opportunity for informed consent and the option to not take the drug.
That's where the vaccine mandate breaks down. OSHA regulations can't dismiss the informed consent of the EUA.
Businesses cannot force the employee to give up their lawful right to consent or opt-out.
-PJ
As parents, we need to be careful where our children go to college. CSU has been a liberal hellhole for a long time. I hope your daughter survived it.
The students should keep the emails.
They will need them for future legal action.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.