Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ethics Complaint Filed Against Psaki for Allegedly Violating Hatch Act
Townhall.com ^ | 15 September A.D. 2021 | Landon Mion

Posted on 10/15/2021 6:01:07 PM PDT by lightman

A government watchdog group filed an ethics complaint against White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki Friday over her endorsement of Terry McAuliffe for Virginia governor during a press briefing, which the group alleges is a violation of the Hatch Act.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics filed a complaint with the Office of Special Counsel, requesting that an investigation be launched to determine if Psaki violated the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal government employees from participating in political campaign activities in their official capacity. The president and vice president are exempt from this rule.

The complaint points to Psaki's comments during Thursday's press briefing, when she told a reporter that "we’re going to do everything we can to help former Governor McAuliffe, and we believe in the agenda he’s representing."

"The last administration systematically co-opted the government for the president’s reelection," CREW President Noah Bookbinder said in a statement. "While this conduct does not come close to rising to the level of the outrageous offenses of the Trump administration, that does not mean we should be casual about compliance with an important ethics law. The Biden administration should not follow the Trump administration down that path."

During the last administration, CREW filed complaints against former Press Secretaries Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Kayleigh McEnany, former Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley, former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and other Trump staffers for violating the law.

McEnany slammed the media Thursday for failing to call out Psaki's violation of the Hatch Act.

"Why does the media not hold [Psaki] accountable for potential Hatch Act violations? She has twice advocated for political candidates from the podium. There is no problem in engaging in First Amendment political activity, but it must be done separate and apart from the podium, She said in a tweet.

But later, during a Friday appearance on CNN, Psaki told host Jake Tapper that she believes her remarks would not have warranted an ethics violation if she had avoided saying "we" when referring to support for McAuliffe.

Psaki's Thursday comments were not the first instance in which she appeared to violate the Hatch Act.

In September, the press secretary said that "hopefully" President Joe Biden campaigning for California Gov. Gavin Newsom ahead of the state's recall election "will be helpful to the efforts of the governor."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: gingergoebbels; hatchact; psaki
Spice up your evening with Ginger Goebbels!
1 posted on 10/15/2021 6:01:07 PM PDT by lightman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lightman

It’s not a crime when they do it. Apparently nothing is a crime when they do it, up to and including taking money directly from communist China while seeking, or holding, office, and other treasonous things.


2 posted on 10/15/2021 6:04:57 PM PDT by coloradan (They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media. It's what they do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

Sic her!


3 posted on 10/15/2021 6:14:32 PM PDT by Don Corleone (leave the gun, take the canolis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Ginger Goebbles is a good one. I like 'Peppermint Patty'.

4 posted on 10/15/2021 6:17:04 PM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman
The last administration systematically co-opted the
government for the president’s reelection,
CREW President
Noah Bookbinder said in a statement. While this conduct does
not come close to rising to the level of the outrageous
offenses of the Trump administration
, that does not mean we
should be casual about compliance with an important ethics
law. The Biden administration should not follow the Trump
administration down that path.

It's getting a little old them placing counter-balancing
comments to deflect the Biden administration's egregious
errors.

Not once in four years did the press deflect in this manner
using infractions Obama had committed.

The propaganda never ends!

5 posted on 10/15/2021 6:18:42 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Democrats, fixing things that haven't been broken, so they don't work, for over 197 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

I really doubt that the Hatch Act applies to a president’s press secretary. I think it’s an exempt position.

Psaki may be a lying sleazeball but this is ridiculous.


6 posted on 10/15/2021 6:22:45 PM PDT by Pelham ('Viruses don't exist' is the latest variant of Flat Earth theory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham; bitt

Okay, if not the Hatch Act, then it must be the Logan Act with a FARA enhancement.


7 posted on 10/15/2021 6:28:19 PM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

They don’t call her Little Red Lying Hood for nuthin!.


8 posted on 10/15/2021 6:28:59 PM PDT by Autonomous User (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Yup,the Harris/Biden Department of Just Us will get right on the case.


9 posted on 10/15/2021 6:54:37 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Covid Is All About Mail In Balloting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Autonomous User

“They don’t call her Little Red Lying Hood for nuthin!.”

I’ve seen some really rude names invented for Psaki.

Unfortunately I can’t remember them right now or I’d share them...


10 posted on 10/15/2021 6:55:08 PM PDT by Pelham ('Viruses don't exist' is the latest variant of Flat Earth theory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Probably. That’s Babylon Bee worthy BTW.


11 posted on 10/15/2021 6:58:47 PM PDT by Pelham ('Viruses don't exist' is the latest variant of Flat Earth theory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

p!


12 posted on 10/15/2021 8:22:48 PM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=50%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

Won’t work. She has NO ETHICS. Can’t be convicted of doing something that is impossible.


13 posted on 10/15/2021 10:31:57 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Figures )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Autonomous User

Evil Raggedy Ann


14 posted on 10/16/2021 4:57:48 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lightman

She is another Baghdad Bob.


15 posted on 10/16/2021 5:07:30 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

It’s not the “we” that’s the problem Jen. It’s using gubmint time and resources to endorse a candidate for partisan office. A lesser mortal would have been put on leave pending investigation and firing.


16 posted on 10/16/2021 7:18:16 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

It applies to everyone except Let’s Go Brandon and his Veep


17 posted on 10/16/2021 7:19:41 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Where’s Kamelahaha?


18 posted on 10/16/2021 7:36:42 AM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

I say she is in violation of the Hatchet Face Act.


19 posted on 10/16/2021 12:11:11 PM PDT by Freedumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

There’s a section of the Hatch Act called “Less Restricted Employees”. They are able to participate in political activities.

“​Most federal executive branch employees (except those listed under Further Restricted Employees) are considered Less Restricted under the Hatch Act. Less Restricted employees may take an active part in partisan political management or partisan political campaigns.​”

“Further Restricted Employees” are the bulk of federal employees and they can’t be political. Press Secretary isn’t listed as “Further Restricted” and doesn’t appear to be covered by any of its categories. Meaning the position is Less Restricted.

https://osc.gov/Services/Pages/HatchAct-Federal.aspx#tabGroup13|tabGroup31


20 posted on 10/16/2021 7:24:43 PM PDT by Pelham ('Viruses don't exist' is the latest variant of Flat Earth theory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson