The GA GOP wants to keep their assistance to the Big Steal under wraps.
Nothing to see here.
Just move on.
another lack of standing punt by a coward in a robe
Is this the guy we thought was going to open it up? Was this the group on War Room?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ……. Can’t do anything more than laugh folks. The corruption and intimidation is too deep, even here in podunk Georgia.
Did the judge issue his decision with extreme prejudice and state that it couldn’t be appellate?
All of this was done to protect Kemp, Duncan, Raffensberger, Carr, Miller, Ralston, Fulton Cty and most importantly, CornPop. Nothing more.
Does anyone find it interesting that just a day or two ago, after two Fulton Cty employees are fired for destroying election/voter related material, that Raffensberger asked for the DOJ to initiate an investigation.
Think about this…..President Trump in the White House. Investigation into Amazon Reed. A few low level folks go to prison. CornPop in the White House, investigation over, Amazon Reed is running for Mayor again.
There’s that pesky, fictional “standing” club again. It seems to work universally.
Someone help me out here.
The judge said no counterfeit ballots were found and yet the ballots were kept “under seal?” How does that make sense?
And which is it? Is the issue “lack of standing” or is the substantive but shaky ballot veracity the issue? It can’t be both simultaneously.
Amero is a Uniparty stooge.
No voting machine used in any election should use proprietary software. Going forward this needs to be the priority in every election.
Proprietary voting machine software amounts to a secret, unmonitored tally of votes by an unaccountable third party. "It doesn't matter how people vote. What matters is who counts the votes"
Voting machine software must be open-source and capable of being examined before the election, monitored during the election, and examined after the election.
No voting machine should be hardwired or wifi-enabled to connect to any outside system. Voting machines must be able to examined by all qualified parties involved.
Any modification of voting software before, during, and after the election must be made and approved by qualified inspectors representing all candidates.
The software must register "one man, one vote". No fractional counting, no weighted counting, and no proportional counting.
Adjudication must be done with poll watchers from all parties present and not an unmonitored lone individual in a back room after hours.
Until we use open-source software that can be examined by qualified inspectors the result of every election remain suspect.
We shouldn't be using private firms with questionable associations and backgrounds to write machine code used in our election. Anyone who submits a contract to provide voting machine software they claim is proprietary should be excluded from receiving a contract
And now the lying left are crowing and claiming “see folks? We told you all along that there was no fraud, and this proves it. After a thorough and complete investigation by bipartisan Investigators, not a smidgen of corruption was found”
Here is another case dismissed without looking at the evidence. This action does not pass the sanity check! Why did this lawyer in black robes do that?
Short rope, tall tree.
Republicans got out lawyered again. Wasn’t the exclusion on observing the counting a violation of voter rights?
They investigated themselves and found themselves innocent.
Under both federal and Georgia law, the three requirements plaintiffs ‘must meet to have standing are “
(1) an injury in fact;
(2) a causal connection between the injury and the causal conduct; and
(3) the likelihood that the injury will be redressed with a favorable decision.” Sons of Confederate Veterans, 2021 WL. 3087576, at *S.
A plaintiff suffers an injury in fact when the injury is both “concrete and particularized” and “actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.” Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992) (internal quotations omitted).
Petitioners allege their votes have been diluted due to the “substantial likelihood” that fraudulent ballots were introduced during ballot processing for the General Election. They reason that Respondents” failure to properly implement state election laws and their negligent oversight of Happy Facesstaffand other agents who assisted in counting ballots at al stages of ballot processing resulted in the introduction and counting of counterfeit ballots. They also allege that the issue will persist in future elections if not corrected.** However, regardless of the veracity of these allegations, the Court finds Petitioners have still f[a]iled to allege a particularized injury.
A. Petitioners have failed to allege a particularized injury.
An injury is particularized when it “affects the plaintiff in a personal and individual way.” Wood v. Raffensperger, 981 F.3d 1307, 1314 (11th Cir. 2020) (internal citations and styling omitted).
Petitioners” allegations are, in sum, that their state equal protection and due process rights were violated because their votes, and the votes of other Georgia voters, were diluted as a result of the inclusion of fraudulent ballots that were counted because Respondents negligently oversaw the ballot processing for the General Election.
“The 11th Cireuit in food found substantially similar allegations of voter dilution insufficient to confer standing. Wood, the appellant, alleged that “irregularities in the hand recount violated his rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Id. at 1312. He asserted he had basis for standing because “the inclusion of unlawfully processed absentee ballots diluted the weight of his vote.” d. at 1314. [excerpt]
Too much time has elapsed. It allowed the left to circle the wagons.