Posted on 10/13/2021 8:30:14 AM PDT by BurgessKoch
A judge dismissed a lawsuit Wednesday by election skeptics who sought to inspect absentee ballots from last year’s presidential election, a decision that came a day after Georgia election investigators told the court they were unable to find any counterfeit ballots. Superior Court Judge Brian Amero ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue, bringing the case to a close and keeping Fulton County’s 147,000 original absentee ballots under seal. The judge’s order is the latest in a series of decisions against supporters of Republican President Donald Trump who have asked the courts to help them pursue suspicions of fraud or reverse the results of the election.
(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...
The GA GOP wants to keep their assistance to the Big Steal under wraps.
Nothing to see here.
Just move on.
Note: GA Judge Amero Dismisses VoterGA Voter Fraud Case Without Hearing Evidence per VoterGA.org
another lack of standing punt by a coward in a robe
Is this the guy we thought was going to open it up? Was this the group on War Room?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ……. Can’t do anything more than laugh folks. The corruption and intimidation is too deep, even here in podunk Georgia.
Did the judge issue his decision with extreme prejudice and state that it couldn’t be appellate?
All of this was done to protect Kemp, Duncan, Raffensberger, Carr, Miller, Ralston, Fulton Cty and most importantly, CornPop. Nothing more.
Does anyone find it interesting that just a day or two ago, after two Fulton Cty employees are fired for destroying election/voter related material, that Raffensberger asked for the DOJ to initiate an investigation.
Think about this…..President Trump in the White House. Investigation into Amazon Reed. A few low level folks go to prison. CornPop in the White House, investigation over, Amazon Reed is running for Mayor again.
There’s that pesky, fictional “standing” club again. It seems to work universally.
Someone help me out here.
The judge said no counterfeit ballots were found and yet the ballots were kept “under seal?” How does that make sense?
And which is it? Is the issue “lack of standing” or is the substantive but shaky ballot veracity the issue? It can’t be both simultaneously.
Amero is a Uniparty stooge.
No voting machine used in any election should use proprietary software. Going forward this needs to be the priority in every election.
Proprietary voting machine software amounts to a secret, unmonitored tally of votes by an unaccountable third party. "It doesn't matter how people vote. What matters is who counts the votes"
Voting machine software must be open-source and capable of being examined before the election, monitored during the election, and examined after the election.
No voting machine should be hardwired or wifi-enabled to connect to any outside system. Voting machines must be able to examined by all qualified parties involved.
Any modification of voting software before, during, and after the election must be made and approved by qualified inspectors representing all candidates.
The software must register "one man, one vote". No fractional counting, no weighted counting, and no proportional counting.
Adjudication must be done with poll watchers from all parties present and not an unmonitored lone individual in a back room after hours.
Until we use open-source software that can be examined by qualified inspectors the result of every election remain suspect.
We shouldn't be using private firms with questionable associations and backgrounds to write machine code used in our election. Anyone who submits a contract to provide voting machine software they claim is proprietary should be excluded from receiving a contract
The democrats have spent years planning all of this out. They have companies or entity’s established that do fake election audits. Then they can use that to keep people from seeing the real truth. Of course they also have judges in their pocket.
I am no lawyer, but on its face, unlike your 4th amendment protection, Govt records must be subject to full public access without showing cause. They very attempt to keep such records hidden SHOULD be prima facie evident that they have something to hide.
It ought be exactly the opposite of the rules for you and me.
So let me follow the example of any authoritarian Prog Governor:
In the interest of public safety I declare the voting system be treated as suspect until proven innocent.
And now the lying left are crowing and claiming “see folks? We told you all along that there was no fraud, and this proves it. After a thorough and complete investigation by bipartisan Investigators, not a smidgen of corruption was found”
NOTHING will protect Kemp, Ratboy, et. al.
The only hope they have is that GA has OPEN primaries, and the Dems will rush in to vote for them as the republican nominees. The same strategy was successfully used by Democrats in MO (also open primaries) when that horrible candidate Akin won the nomination for Senator against McCaskill. Akin was the simp who said rape was impossible because if the woman really didn't want sex, her vaginal muscles would tighten and prevent penetration. What a gift to McCaskill when Akin won his primary against 2 real conservatives thanks to Democrats...
Here is another case dismissed without looking at the evidence. This action does not pass the sanity check! Why did this lawyer in black robes do that?
Short rope, tall tree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.