Anyone know how this works? Do the legal challenges start once it is published in the Federal Register?
1 posted on
10/12/2021 8:27:14 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: MNJohnnie
I’ve travelled all over the nation, partied at every happy hour we could make and eaten out at restaurants, both full and nigh empty for 22 months now. I doubt I’m “just lucky” in not catching the plague. If I didn’t take the shot before, why would I do it now? What benefit am I gaining that I haven’t experienced in the past 22 months?
Mother is elderly, yeah I recommended it. Brothers have circumstances that immediately impacted vulnerable people. They had it, too. All are fine.
Yet I see no need for this now. The storm is waning…
67 posted on
10/13/2021 2:10:46 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: MNJohnnie
“or make them get tested for COVID-19 once a week. “
If that was a cheap ($3-$5), do it at home test, that would be workable.
To: MNJohnnie
73 posted on
10/13/2021 3:05:11 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
To: MNJohnnie
2 million bureaucrats runningthis country and making laws while our so called elected officials sit back, scratch their cod’s and draw a nice tidy paycheck
76 posted on
10/13/2021 3:45:12 AM PDT by
eartick
(Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT)
To: MNJohnnie
We’re going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated co-workers. The addled asshole just admitted that the frankenshots don't work.
80 posted on
10/13/2021 3:55:30 AM PDT by
Sirius Lee
(They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
To: MNJohnnie
Probably some on here that will support that.
Nevermind that nothing available here has been granted full authorization.
90 posted on
10/13/2021 4:21:52 AM PDT by
wastedyears
(The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
To: MNJohnnie; All
Yay! More worker strikes and misery for us all!
Only 38 more months to go! *SPIT*
92 posted on
10/13/2021 4:34:41 AM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
To: MNJohnnie
So what businesses are exempt?
To: MNJohnnie
98 posted on
10/13/2021 4:58:16 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
To: MNJohnnie
Abbott moved his pawn, now Biden moved his.
To: MNJohnnie
102 posted on
10/13/2021 5:18:08 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
To: MNJohnnie
104 posted on
10/13/2021 5:23:48 AM PDT by
Cboldt
To: MNJohnnie
Mao starved out a good proportion of his country. We are well on our way.
105 posted on
10/13/2021 5:27:01 AM PDT by
ez
("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton)
To: MNJohnnie
Whatever it is, I'm against it.
![](http://www.billdamon.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/grouchoWhatever.jpg)
What should be the GOP anthem
124 posted on
10/13/2021 7:16:14 AM PDT by
Eleutheria5
(Hard times: hard men. Hard men: soft times. Soft times: soft men. Soft men: hard times)
To: MNJohnnie; ransomnote; Jane Long; bitt; bagster; numberonepal; Cletus.D.Yokel; Cathi; greeneyes; ...
127 posted on
10/13/2021 7:21:01 AM PDT by
grey_whiskers
((The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.))
To: MNJohnnie
If that were a real vaccination you wouldn’t need to protect the vaccinated from the unvaccinated.
To: MNJohnnie
They are going to bring the economy to a halt and then...
137 posted on
10/13/2021 8:35:14 AM PDT by
Bloodandgravy
(Wantonness needs putting out, even more than a house on fire.)
To: MNJohnnie
I find it hard to believe that ANYONE...even the most died in the wool leftie...could look at that KOOK PSAKI...and agree with her, or like her, or find her honest or comforting.
The woman is a CREEP. And I mean that in the worst way. YECH.
To: MNJohnnie
The EUA vaccines require a patient informed consent form to be signed. United States case law says that
any consent given under duress is not consent under the law.
It seems to me that forcing someone to get a vaccine or lose their jobs, their pay, and their family security, is the utmost coercive duress possible on someone.
Nobody can give a legally binding consent under these conditions, and for that reason these mandates to take the EUA vaccines should be challenged in court.
Here is the relevant section of US Code 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies:
- (e) Conditions of authorization
- (1) Unapproved product
- (A) Required conditions
- With respect to the emergency use of an unapproved product, the Secretary, to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances described in subsection (b)(1), shall, for a person who carries out any activity for which the authorization is issued, establish such conditions on an authorization under this section as the Secretary finds necessary or appropriate to protect the public health, including the following:
- (i)Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that health care professionals administering the product are informed—
- (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
- (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of the emergency use of the product, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
- (III) of the alternatives to the product that are available, and of their benefits and risks.
- (ii)Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—
- (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
- (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
- (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.
- (iii) Appropriate conditions for the monitoring and reporting of adverse events associated with the emergency use of the product.
- (iv)cFor manufacturers of the product, appropriate conditions concerning recordkeeping and reporting, including records access by the Secretary, with respect to the emergency use of the product.
Note that this section is for Emergency Use Authorization and includes informed consent and the option to refuse.
I underlined the part about "consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product" because I believe this pertains to the medical "consequences" of not taking the drug. It does NOT give permission to businesses to place "consequences" on employees who don't take the drug. The former gives the recipient the choice, the latter is coercive consent under duress.
-PJ
160 posted on
10/15/2021 8:35:04 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson